Tomi Ollila writes:
>> fi
>>
>> +if [ -n "${LD_PRELOAD-}" ]; then
>
> Is it problem to chain LD_PRELOADs here ? I see later in this message
> there is LD_PRELOAD's concatenated with :'s (in case non-empty) ?
>
It is not a problem in general, but ASAN insists on being first in
LD_PRELOAD, so
Tomi Ollila writes:
>> -LD_PRELOAD=${LD_PRELOAD:+:$LD_PRELOAD}:./${shim_file} notmuch-shared
>> "$@"
>> +LD_PRELOAD=${LD_PRELOAD:+:$LD_PRELOAD}:./${shim_file} $notmuch_cmd "$@"
>
> hmm, should the "chaining" be done on other order (i.e. the shim_file
> before anything if there... (that
On Sun, Jul 09 2023, David Bremner wrote:
Note: I almost commented cases where it was not ensured that variable
is defined, to notice later that those were actually defined for sure
-- so in some previous mails in this series I may have missed
same cases.
The comments for this message may be
We put some effort into testing the built copy rather than some
installed copy. On the other hand for people like packagers, testing
the installed copy is also of interest.
When NOTMUCH_TEST_INSTALLED is set to a nonempty value, tests do not
require a built notmuch tree or running configure.
