[afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

I'm tring to figure out how to use afew. It looks interesting, but gives me surprising results. I did `afew --learn spam -- tag:spam` and believe this tells afew that all the messages matching tag:spam should be classified as spam. But if that is right, why would `afew -c spam -- tag:spam` then

Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

I'm tring to figure out how to use afew. It looks interesting, but gives me surprising results. I did `afew --learn spam -- tag:spam` and believe this tells afew that all the messages matching tag:spam should be classified as spam. But if that is right, why would `afew -c spam -- tag:spam` then

[afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Quoting Kazuo Teramoto (2012-01-20 22:55:08) >On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:26:05PM +0100, Justus Winter wrote: >> Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-01-20 11:40:41) >> >I suspect you don't split the config value and thus afew ended up >> >with a false tag "new;". its just cosmetics but nevertheless.. >>

[afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:26:05PM +0100, Justus Winter wrote: > Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-01-20 11:40:41) > >I suspect you don't split the config value and thus afew ended up > >with a false tag "new;". its just cosmetics but nevertheless.. > > Hm, actually it does exactly that: > > def

[afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-01-20 11:40:41) >Quoting Justus Winter (2011-12-21 08:53:23) >>Hey Pazz, >> >>Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-19 19:17:12) >>>Also, should i not get some output when calling afew with -vv ? >> >>Yes you should ;). Here's an example run on my box: >Alright, I do get

[afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Quoting Justus Winter (2011-12-21 08:53:23) >Hey Pazz, > >Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-19 19:17:12) >>Also, should i not get some output when calling afew with -vv ? > >Yes you should ;). Here's an example run on my box: Alright, I do get logging output with upstream master thanks. FYI: I

Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Quoting Justus Winter (2011-12-21 08:53:23) Hey Pazz, Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-19 19:17:12) Also, should i not get some output when calling afew with -vv ? Yes you should ;). Here's an example run on my box: Alright, I do get logging output with upstream master thanks. FYI: I found the

Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-01-20 11:40:41) Quoting Justus Winter (2011-12-21 08:53:23) Hey Pazz, Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-19 19:17:12) Also, should i not get some output when calling afew with -vv ? Yes you should ;). Here's an example run on my box: Alright, I do get logging output

Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:26:05PM +0100, Justus Winter wrote: Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-01-20 11:40:41) I suspect you don't split the config value and thus afew ended up with a false tag new;. its just cosmetics but nevertheless.. Hm, actually it does exactly that: def

Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Quoting Kazuo Teramoto (2012-01-20 22:55:08) On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:26:05PM +0100, Justus Winter wrote: Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-01-20 11:40:41) I suspect you don't split the config value and thus afew ended up with a false tag new;. its just cosmetics but nevertheless.. Hm, actually

[afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Hey Pazz, Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-19 19:17:12) >Also, should i not get some output when calling afew with -vv ? Yes you should ;). Here's an example run on my box: teythoon at thinkbox ~/repos/afew (git)-[master] % python3.2 bin/afew -vv --tag --new INFO:root:Tagging spam messages

[afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Hey Jamie :) Quoting Jameson Graef Rollins (2011-12-19 18:57:00) >On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:13:51 +0100, Justus Winter <4winter at >informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote: >> Is your new tag called 'is:new'? Mine is just called 'new' > >is: is a search prefix, synonymous with tag: Ah, thanks for the

Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Hey Jamie :) Quoting Jameson Graef Rollins (2011-12-19 18:57:00) On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:13:51 +0100, Justus Winter 4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de wrote: Is your new tag called 'is:new'? Mine is just called 'new' is: is a search prefix, synonymous with tag: Ah, thanks for the clarification.

Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Hey Pazz, Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-19 19:17:12) Also, should i not get some output when calling afew with -vv ? Yes you should ;). Here's an example run on my box: teythoon@thinkbox ~/repos/afew (git)-[master] % python3.2 bin/afew -vv --tag --new INFO:root:Tagging spam messages

[afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Quoting Jameson Graef Rollins (2011-12-19 17:57:00) >On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:13:51 +0100, Justus Winter <4winter at >informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote: >> Is your new tag called 'is:new'? Mine is just called 'new' > >is: is a search prefix, synonymous with tag: Apologies, that was misleading: my

[afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Hey Pazz :) Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-14 17:59:43) >Hi Justus, > >I have just tried your script and have some questions/remarks about it: > >* mkdir -p ~/.config/afew ~/.local/share/afew/categories > As far as I can see, this is not needed if one doesn't use ClassifyingFilter, > so its OK

[afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:13:51 +0100, Justus Winter <4winter at informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote: > Is your new tag called 'is:new'? Mine is just called 'new' is: is a search prefix, synonymous with tag: > That could be a problem since 'new' as tag for new mails is currently > hardcoded at

Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Hey Pazz :) Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-14 17:59:43) Hi Justus, I have just tried your script and have some questions/remarks about it: * mkdir -p ~/.config/afew ~/.local/share/afew/categories As far as I can see, this is not needed if one doesn't use ClassifyingFilter, so its OK not to

Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:13:51 +0100, Justus Winter 4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de wrote: Is your new tag called 'is:new'? Mine is just called 'new' is: is a search prefix, synonymous with tag: That could be a problem since 'new' as tag for new mails is currently hardcoded at various

[afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Hi Justus, I have just tried your script and have some questions/remarks about it: * mkdir -p ~/.config/afew ~/.local/share/afew/categories As far as I can see, this is not needed if one doesn't use ClassifyingFilter, so its OK not to do this directly from the setup.py somehow. But it

[afew] announcing afew,

Quoting Kazuo Teramoto (2011-12-14 12:24:14) >an universal tagging solution with some fancy features >From: Kazuo Teramoto >In-Reply-To: >On 2011-12-14T08:42:36, Justus Winter wrote: >>I'd like to introduce my initial tagging approach, afew tags: >> >>https://github.com/teythoon/afew >> > >Very

[afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:42:36 +0100, Justus Winter <4winter at informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote: > https://github.com/teythoon/afew > > It has some nifty features, citing the README: """ Basic tagging stuff requires no configuration, just run $ afew --tag --new To do this automatically you can

[afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Hey everyone :) I'd like to introduce my initial tagging approach, afew tags: https://github.com/teythoon/afew It has some nifty features, citing the README: * text classification, magic tags aka the mailing list without server * spam handling (flush all tags, add spam) * killed thread

[afew] announcing afew,

an universal tagging solution with some fancy features From: Kazuo Teramoto In-Reply-To: On 2011-12-14T08:42:36, Justus Winter wrote: >I'd like to introduce my initial tagging approach, afew tags: > >https://github.com/teythoon/afew > Very good! Thanks for it. I'm

[afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Hey everyone :) I'd like to introduce my initial tagging approach, afew tags: https://github.com/teythoon/afew It has some nifty features, citing the README: * text classification, magic tags aka the mailing list without server * spam handling (flush all tags, add spam) * killed thread

Re: [afew] announcing afew,

an universal tagging solution with some fancy features From: Kazuo Teramoto kaz@gmail.com In-Reply-To: e1ramig-0003si...@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de On 2011-12-14T08:42:36, Justus Winter wrote: I'd like to introduce my initial tagging approach, afew tags: https://github.com/teythoon/afew

Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:42:36 +0100, Justus Winter 4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de wrote: https://github.com/teythoon/afew It has some nifty features, citing the README: Basic tagging stuff requires no configuration, just run $ afew --tag --new To do this automatically you can add the

Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

Hi Justus, I have just tried your script and have some questions/remarks about it: * mkdir -p ~/.config/afew ~/.local/share/afew/categories As far as I can see, this is not needed if one doesn't use ClassifyingFilter, so its OK not to do this directly from the setup.py somehow. But it