On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:07:20 +0100, Jed Brown wrote:
> > Second, since we're in the search view which shows threads, we should
> > really be operating on threads. But this tag command won't work like the
> > '+' and '-' commands in this buffer. Those commands will add/remove a
> > tag to/from
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:14:25 +0100, Carl Worth wrote:
> Second, I like that you just used the search string again, (as opposed
> to just walking through the buffer looking at thread IDs). That seems
> elegant.
It was *easy*.
> First, this creates a race condition in that the user will rightly
>
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:12:16 +0100, Jed Brown wrote:
> It is often convenient to change tags on several messages at once. This
> function applies any number of tag whitespace-delimited tag
> modifications to all messages matching the current query.
>
> I have bound this to `*'.
Very nice, Jed!
It is often convenient to change tags on several messages at once. This
function applies any number of tag whitespace-delimited tag
modifications to all messages matching the current query.
I have bound this to `*'.
Signed-off-by: Jed Brown
---
notmuch.el | 24
1
