[v2 3/3] thread-naming test: Test empty subject names.

David Bremner writes: > Jesse Rosenthal writes: > >> >> +test_begin_subtest "Use empty subjects if necessary." >> +add_message '[subject]="@FORCE_EMPTY"' \ >> +'[date]="Sat, 13 Jan 2001 15:43:45 -"' \ >> +'[from]="Empty Sender \ > It seems to me we should avoid

Re: [v2 3/3] thread-naming test: Test empty subject names.

David Bremner da...@tethera.net writes: Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu writes: +test_begin_subtest Use empty subjects if necessary. +add_message '[subject]=@FORCE_EMPTY' \ +'[date]=Sat, 13 Jan 2001 15:43:45 -' \ +'[from]=Empty Sender

[v2 3/3] thread-naming test: Test empty subject names.

Jesse Rosenthal writes: > > +test_begin_subtest "Use empty subjects if necessary." > +add_message '[subject]="@FORCE_EMPTY"' \ > + '[date]="Sat, 13 Jan 2001 15:43:45 -"' \ > +'[from]="Empty Sender \

Re: [v2 3/3] thread-naming test: Test empty subject names.

Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu writes: +test_begin_subtest Use empty subjects if necessary. +add_message '[subject]=@FORCE_EMPTY' \ + '[date]=Sat, 13 Jan 2001 15:43:45 -' \ +'[from]=Empty Sender \empty_t...@notmuchmail.org\ It seems to me we should avoid

[v2 3/3] thread-naming test: Test empty subject names.

We test all empty subjects, and then empty subjects followed by non-empty subjects (searching both oldest- and newest-first). --- test/T200-thread-naming.sh | 32 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) diff --git a/test/T200-thread-naming.sh