Jean-Marc Liotier writes:
> I would have prefered explicit folder inclusion/exclusion at query time
> and path inclusion/exclusion at indexing time... But I guess I'll get
> used to notmuch's logic of tagging everything and then using the tags.
In general tags are helpful (or just full text
On 10/03/2015 08:10, David Bremner wrote:
> [..] In fact the NM_myTopLevelFolder doesn't seem useful to me,
> since you don't gain any new queries that way.
>
> So if you have .foo.* and .bar.*, I would
>
> mkdir foo
> ln -rs .foo.* -t foo
I had forgotten I could make a maildir without initial .
Jean-Marc Liotier writes:
>
> % cd ~/Maildir
> % mkdir .NM_myTopLevelFolder
> % ln -rs .myTopLevelFolder* -t .NM_myTopLevelFolder
This is doing one level of links. If you want more hierarchy
you'll have to create subdirectories with links to only some of your
folders. In fact the
On 09/03/2015 23:06, David Bremner wrote:
> Jean-Marc Liotier writes:
>> So nowadays, is there any other way to express "this folder and all its
>> subfolders" ? The path: keyword does not seem useful for that with a maildir
>> with a flat structure of dot.delimited.directories - or is there
Jean-Marc Liotier writes:
>
> So nowadays, is there any other way to express "this folder and all its
> subfolders" ? The path: keyword does not seem useful for that with a
> maildir with a flat structure of dot.delimited.directories - or is there
> something like a dot.delimited.* wildcard ?
On 10/03/2015 08:10, David Bremner wrote:
[..] In fact the NM_myTopLevelFolder doesn't seem useful to me,
since you don't gain any new queries that way.
So if you have .foo.* and .bar.*, I would
mkdir foo
ln -rs .foo.* -t foo
I had forgotten I could make a maildir without initial . just as
Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org writes:
I would have prefered explicit folder inclusion/exclusion at query time
and path inclusion/exclusion at indexing time... But I guess I'll get
used to notmuch's logic of tagging everything and then using the tags.
In general tags are helpful (or
Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org writes:
% cd ~/Maildir
% mkdir .NM_myTopLevelFolder
% ln -rs .myTopLevelFolder* -t .NM_myTopLevelFolder
This is doing one level of links. If you want more hierarchy
you'll have to create subdirectories with links to only some of your
folders. In fact the
Hello ! I am a brand new Notmuch user (and Mairix emigrant - looks like
I am not the only one here), very impressed with how everything works
right out of the box - thanks to all who made Notmuch !
From http://notmuchmail.org/news/release-0.18/ I read: "Wildcard
matching (folder:foo*) is no
Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org writes:
So nowadays, is there any other way to express this folder and all its
subfolders ? The path: keyword does not seem useful for that with a
maildir with a flat structure of dot.delimited.directories - or is there
something like a dot.delimited.*
Hello ! I am a brand new Notmuch user (and Mairix emigrant - looks like
I am not the only one here), very impressed with how everything works
right out of the box - thanks to all who made Notmuch !
From http://notmuchmail.org/news/release-0.18/ I read: Wildcard
matching (folder:foo*) is no
On 09/03/2015 23:06, David Bremner wrote:
Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org writes:
So nowadays, is there any other way to express this folder and all its
subfolders ? The path: keyword does not seem useful for that with a maildir with a
flat structure of dot.delimited.directories - or is
12 matches
Mail list logo
