Am Di., 9. Jan. 2024 um 13:38 Uhr schrieb David Bremner :
>
> Michael J Gruber writes:
>
> >>
> >> I agree the bindings documentation does not make much sense. I suspect
> >> that the bindings should follow the underlying library and return "" if
> >> the library does. I don't use the bindings
Michael J Gruber writes:
>>
>> I agree the bindings documentation does not make much sense. I suspect
>> that the bindings should follow the underlying library and return "" if
>> the library does. I don't use the bindings that much, so I am curious
>> what others think.
>
> I might be
Am Di., 9. Jan. 2024 um 00:09 Uhr schrieb David Bremner :
>
> Vojtěch Káně writes:
>
> > At first, this sounds reasonable: the subject is empty, so it is
> > effectively missing. That would indicate a bug in Lieer itself and would
> > be fixed by a try-catch block. Notmuch's source for
Vojtěch Káně writes:
> At first, this sounds reasonable: the subject is empty, so it is
> effectively missing. That would indicate a bug in Lieer itself and would
> be fixed by a try-catch block. Notmuch's source for Message.header,
> however, states:
>
>>:returns: The header value, an empty
Dear notmuch developers,
I'll start with a short description of how I encountered the bug, so my
report is more understandable and also so that you can potentially
direct me to other places where the bug actually resides (I am a bit
skeptic I would find a bug in such a popular open source
