David Edmondson writes:
>
> My inclination is to say "if you want to change the headers that are
> hidden in message mode, change `message-hidden-headers'" and don't
> bother with any notmuch specific settings.
>
> That, of course, leads me to wonder why I ever added
>
On Mon, Apr 11 2016, Mark Walters wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, David Bremner wrote:
>> Mark Walters writes:
>>
>>> I think we already have this, except it is called
>>> notmuch-mua-hidden-headers. It defaults to '("^User-Agent:").
>>>
>>> I think it
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, David Bremner wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
>
>> I think we already have this, except it is called
>> notmuch-mua-hidden-headers. It defaults to '("^User-Agent:").
>>
>> I think it would be reasonable to add In-Reply-To to this
Mark Walters writes:
> I think we already have this, except it is called
> notmuch-mua-hidden-headers. It defaults to '("^User-Agent:").
>
> I think it would be reasonable to add In-Reply-To to this list.
>
> However, if I read the code correctly, currently we are
Hi
On Sat, 09 Apr 2016, David Bremner wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
>
>> On Tue 2016-04-05 01:28:43 -0400, David Mazieres wrote:
>>> Arguably, I would say either both the In-Reply-To and the References
>>> header should be hidden or neither.
On Tue 2016-04-05 01:28:43 -0400, David Mazieres wrote:
> Arguably, I would say either both the In-Reply-To and the References
> header should be hidden or neither. Otherwise, what was happening is
> that I was deleting the In-Reply-To header as it was the only one I saw,
> and figuring that
Mark Walters writes:
> By default the reference header is hidden. It is controlled by
> message-hidden-headers which you can customize. (Note notmuch adds
> user-agent to this list via notmuch-mua-hidden-header.)
Thanks for explaining this! So I posted about one
On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 06:56:12 -0700, David Mazieres
wrote:
> David Bremner writes:
>
>> David Mazieres writes:
>>
>>> Is there any way to break an existing thread (so as to start over with a
>>>
David Mazieres writes:
> Is there any way to break an existing thread (so as to start over with a
> smaller thread), or otherwise to tweak the threading rules so that a
> particular References header gets ignored.
Currently there is no way to do this, as