On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 02:45:04 -0800, mazieres-6kd3dvy8f9kx6dc7vcsytfvnai at
temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> This folder-based searching is very handy.
Hello, anonymous poster from Stanford. Welcome to notmuch!
I'm glad you're happy with the folder-based searching and I hope you
f
This folder-based searching is very handy. However, I have a scenario
in which I'd prefer to consolidate mail to multiple addresses into one
or a small number of physical mail folders. Thus, what I really want
to search on is not the mail folder name, but the Delivered-To:
header.
Can someone
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 02:45:04 -0800,
mazieres-6kd3dvy8f9kx6dc7vcsytfv...@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu wrote:
This folder-based searching is very handy.
Hello, anonymous poster from Stanford. Welcome to notmuch!
I'm glad you're happy with the folder-based searching and I hope you
find
The folder search implementation in the custom query parser is always rooted
(both because that happened to be much easier to do in that design, and
because I agree with you that rooted searches seem preferable most of the
time). What arguments do people have for or against rooted folder
Carl Worth writes:
> This works in a similar way to 'subject:"some phrase"', (though more
> people seem to be asking about these details for folder: than have ever
> asked for subject:).
I'm not surprised. Imagine:
/misc
/debian/misc
If I understand correctly, right now you'd have to say
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:54:29 -0600, Rob Browning
wrote:
> I'd be tempted to consider making folder: searches rooted by default. I
> wonder how often people really want "all folders named misc"?
That's a possibility---*after* someone does the work to enable rooted
searches in the first place.
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:48:11 -0600, Rob Browning
wrote:
> Nice.
Thanks.
> So what are the path semantics? For example, is the path case
> sensitive or insensitive? Can you say folder:foo/bar, and if so, is the
> path rooted, or can it match path sub-segments?
>
> i.e. which of these, if
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:48:11 -0600, Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org wrote:
Nice.
Thanks.
So what are the path semantics? For example, is the path case
sensitive or insensitive? Can you say folder:foo/bar, and if so, is the
path rooted, or can it match path sub-segments?
i.e. which of
Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org writes:
This works in a similar way to 'subject:some phrase', (though more
people seem to be asking about these details for folder: than have ever
asked for subject:).
I'm not surprised. Imagine:
/misc
/debian/misc
If I understand correctly, right now you'd
The folder search implementation in the custom query parser is always rooted
(both because that happened to be much easier to do in that design, and
because I agree with you that rooted searches seem preferable most of the
time). What arguments do people have for or against rooted folder
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:43:44 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> > Before the next release, I plan to increment the database version so
> > that users will be notified of the need to do an upgrade like this. (But
> > before I do that, I plan to implement a few more database changes---and
> > some
> Before the next release, I plan to increment the database version so
> that users will be notified of the need to do an upgrade like this. (But
> before I do that, I plan to implement a few more database changes---and
> some of them are likely to be much more invasive than this one).
Hurray,
Carl Worth writes:
> Someone bringing in mail from such a system might want to migrate from
> information in directory names to instead be information in notmuch
> tags. That might look something like this:
>
> notmuch tag +important folder:important
Nice. So what are the path semantics?
Hi,
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:46:53 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> I'm as sad as anyone to see that I let more than a month go by without
> committing to the notmuch repository.
Life goes like this...
> But I've just now committed the much-desired folder-based search
> feature.
Awesome !
> This
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:43:44 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
Before the next release, I plan to increment the database version so
that users will be notified of the need to do an upgrade like this. (But
before I do that, I plan to implement a few more database
Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org writes:
Someone bringing in mail from such a system might want to migrate from
information in directory names to instead be information in notmuch
tags. That might look something like this:
notmuch tag +important folder:important
Nice. So what are the
Hi,
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:46:53 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
I'm as sad as anyone to see that I let more than a month go by without
committing to the notmuch repository.
Life goes like this...
But I've just now committed the much-desired folder-based search
feature.
Awesome
I'm as sad as anyone to see that I let more than a month go by without
committing to the notmuch repository.
But I've just now committed the much-desired folder-based search
feature.
This should be a handy feature for people bringing mail in from a system
that stores information in the
I'm as sad as anyone to see that I let more than a month go by without
committing to the notmuch repository.
But I've just now committed the much-desired folder-based search
feature.
This should be a handy feature for people bringing mail in from a system
that stores information in the
19 matches
Mail list logo
