On Sun, 03 Nov 2013, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> The current behavior can be annoying, but the old behavior could make
> the MUA quite unusable in a number of circumstances. (And yes, an MUA
> that fails on reading mail from senders with bad emailing practices is
> unusable for me.)
I wouldn't have
On Sun, 03 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
>>>
> I think there should be a w
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> Jani Nikula writes:
>> I think it's actually worse than what your example demonstrates. It's
>> the subject of the newest/oldest *matching* message that gets used. In
>> your example, the first/last messages in the thread apparently match
>
Jani Nikula writes:
> I think it's actually worse than what your example demonstrates. It's
> the subject of the newest/oldest *matching* message that gets used. In
> your example, the first/last messages in the thread apparently match
> your query.
The behavior is there because subjects frequent
On 11/02/2013 09:08 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Either way this doesn't make any sense to me. Each thread has a single origin
> mail, why would anybody would like to show a message other than that while
> displaying the summary of the tread? Even more, why isn't there an option to
> fetch that in
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On 11/02/2013 09:08 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>
>> Either way this doesn't make any sense to me. Each thread has a single
>> origin
>> mail, why would anybody would like to show a message other than that while
>> displaying the summar
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>
I think there should be a way to get the root mail of a thread,
irrespective of t
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> Jani Nikula writes:
>> I think it's actually worse than what your example demonstrates. It's
>> the subject of the newest/oldest *matching* message that gets used. In
>> your example, the first/last messages in the thread apparently match
>
On Sun, 03 Nov 2013, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> The current behavior can be annoying, but the old behavior could make
> the MUA quite unusable in a number of circumstances. (And yes, an MUA
> that fails on reading mail from senders with bad emailing practices is
> unusable for me.)
I wouldn't have
Jani Nikula writes:
> I think it's actually worse than what your example demonstrates. It's
> the subject of the newest/oldest *matching* message that gets used. In
> your example, the first/last messages in the thread apparently match
> your query.
The behavior is there because subjects frequent
On Sun, 03 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>>
> I think there should be a way to
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On 11/02/2013 09:08 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>
>> Either way this doesn't make any sense to me. Each thread has a single
>> origin
>> mail, why would anybody would like to show a message other than that while
>> displaying the summar
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>
I think there should be a way to get the root mail of a thread,
irrespective of t
On 11/02/2013 09:08 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Either way this doesn't make any sense to me. Each thread has a single origin
mail, why would anybody would like to show a message other than that while
displaying the summary of the tread? Even more, why isn't there an option to
fetch that informat
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>>> I think there should be a way to get the root mail of a thread,
>>> irrespective of the search order.
>>
>> Largely agreed. It's just that nobod
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> I often wondered why when browsing threads, I often see a message that doesn't
> describe at all the thread, for example:
>
> notmuch search ...
> thread:826a 18 mins. ago [45/45] Felipe Contreras; [PATCH/TEST
> 44/44]
>
> I can rever
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> I think there should be a way to get the root mail of a thread,
>> irrespective of the search order.
>
> Largely agreed. It's just that nobody's gotten around to doing this
> yet. At the cli leve
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>>> I think there should be a way to get the root mail of a thread,
>>> irrespective of the search order.
>>
>> Largely agreed. It's just that nobod
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> I think there should be a way to get the root mail of a thread,
>> irrespective of the search order.
>
> Largely agreed. It's just that nobody's gotten around to doing this
> yet. At the cli leve
Hi,
I often wondered why when browsing threads, I often see a message that doesn't
describe at all the thread, for example:
notmuch search ...
thread:826a 18 mins. ago [45/45] Felipe Contreras; [PATCH/TEST
44/44]
I can reverse the order of the search:
notmuch search --sort=ol
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> I often wondered why when browsing threads, I often see a message that doesn't
> describe at all the thread, for example:
>
> notmuch search ...
> thread:826a 18 mins. ago [45/45] Felipe Contreras; [PATCH/TEST
> 44/44]
>
> I can rever
Hi,
I often wondered why when browsing threads, I often see a message that doesn't
describe at all the thread, for example:
notmuch search ...
thread:826a 18 mins. ago [45/45] Felipe Contreras; [PATCH/TEST
44/44]
I can reverse the order of the search:
notmuch search --sort=ol
22 matches
Mail list logo
