On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:56:13 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> I'm curious if you're both solving the same problem.
I would assume so; my patch simply kludges around the problem with a
hack in the emacs code while jrollins is fixing the underlying gmime
interactions.
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
p
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:56:13 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> I'm curious if you're both solving the same problem.
I would assume so; my patch simply kludges around the problem with a
hack in the emacs code while jrollins is fixing the underlying gmime
interactions.
--
keith.packard at intel.com
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 01:06:05 -0700, "Keith Packard"
wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/mixed
Non-text part: multipart/signed
>
> I wasn't seeing anything for an inlined message/rfc822 part (as with a
> forwarded email message) and discovered that for some reason, the
> message structure wasn't as e
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 01:06:05 -0700, "Keith Packard" wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/mixed
Non-text part: multipart/signed
>
> I wasn't seeing anything for an inlined message/rfc822 part (as with a
> forwarded email message) and discovered that for some reason, the
> message structure wasn't as ex
I wasn't seeing anything for an inlined message/rfc822 part (as with a
forwarded email message) and discovered that for some reason, the
message structure wasn't as expected. The following patch appears to
help me.
I'm still stuck trying to use the 'v' key to display attachments from
forwarded me
I wasn't seeing anything for an inlined message/rfc822 part (as with a
forwarded email message) and discovered that for some reason, the
message structure wasn't as expected. The following patch appears to
help me.
I'm still stuck trying to use the 'v' key to display attachments from
forwarded me