Possible to do more async?

2010-10-26 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:36:52 -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote: > id:87d3xjxnxd.fsf at servo.finestructure.net Yeah, I know I can patch it out. But I am tired of it reappearing everything I revert to vanilla notmuch :). It doesn't make sense upstream either (as it is inconsistent with new emails). So

Possible to do more async?

2010-10-26 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
Pressing 'a' to archive a thread and advance to the next takes about 2 seconds. This is annoying when I am just scanning my spam-infested mail account. Would emacs provide the possibility to first advance to the next thread and tag the old thread asynchronously? tagging could happen asynchronously

Possible to do more async?

2010-10-26 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:08:17 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > P.S. And *somebody* please remove the notmuch-inserted BCC when > replying. It is a)inconsistent with new mails via C-mx anyway, and b) > could be inserted by the emacs UI for those who want it. id:87d3xjxnxd.fsf at

Re: Possible to do more async?

2010-10-26 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:08:17 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: P.S. And *somebody* please remove the notmuch-inserted BCC when replying. It is a)inconsistent with new mails via C-mx anyway, and b) could be inserted by the emacs UI for those who want it.

Re: Possible to do more async?

2010-10-26 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:36:52 -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote: id:87d3xjxnxd@servo.finestructure.net Yeah, I know I can patch it out. But I am tired of it reappearing everything I revert to vanilla notmuch :). It doesn't make sense upstream either (as it is inconsistent with new emails). So I