Printing mail

2010-11-11 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:57:05 +, David Edmondson wrote: > How about something like the attached? Still untested, but hurray, yes please! :) \o/ Sebastian -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size:

Printing mail

2010-11-11 Thread David Edmondson
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:43:53 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:32:01 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > > which gives me nice menu entries for previewing my printouts (defaults > > to 'gv' but can easily be set to use 'evince') and which provides the > > M-x

Re: Printing mail

2010-11-11 Thread David Edmondson
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:43:53 -0800, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote: On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:32:01 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: which gives me nice menu entries for previewing my printouts (defaults to 'gv' but can easily be set to use 'evince') and which

Re: Printing mail

2010-11-11 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:57:05 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote: How about something like the attached? Still untested, but hurray, yes please! :) \o/ Sebastian pgpcXdH8XiwFf.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ notmuch mailing list

Printing mail

2010-11-10 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 10:00:59 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > I like the header formatting. And, using evince provides a 'friendly' > print dialog. But, yeah, something that dealt with mail encodings and > attachments would be even nicer. I have the printing package loaded (require 'printing)

Printing mail

2010-11-09 Thread Keith Packard
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:32:01 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > which gives me nice menu entries for previewing my printouts (defaults > to 'gv' but can easily be set to use 'evince') and which provides the > M-x pr-ps-buffer-preview command to invoke the print preview directly > (unfortunately

Printing mail

2010-11-09 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
doesn't look too bad here and even copes with the encoding better than the printout of your mail with muttprint had looked. Not sure if we should bind a key to ps-print-buffer in notmuch by default? The only nuissane is that the title bar simply says "*Printing mail* (unsave)* here. Is there

Printing mail

2010-11-09 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:16:48 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > M-x ps-print buffer doesn't look too bad here and even copes with the > encoding better than the printout of your mail with muttprint had > looked. I like the header formatting. And, using evince provides a 'friendly' print dialog.

Printing mail

2010-11-09 Thread Keith Packard
Print is dead. Or so they say Here's a script I'm using with '|' to get mail printed. As you can see, it previews the mail on-screen with 'evince', from which you use the regular 'print' dialog. #!/bin/sh tmp=`mktemp` muttprint -p "TO_FILE:$tmp" evince $tmp rm $tmp Making this more secure

Printing mail

2010-11-09 Thread Keith Packard
Print is dead. Or so they say Here's a script I'm using with '|' to get mail printed. As you can see, it previews the mail on-screen with 'evince', from which you use the regular 'print' dialog. #!/bin/sh tmp=`mktemp` muttprint -p TO_FILE:$tmp evince $tmp rm $tmp Making this more secure would

Re: Printing mail

2010-11-09 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:16:48 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: M-x ps-print buffer doesn't look too bad here and even copes with the encoding better than the printout of your mail with muttprint had looked. I like the header formatting. And, using evince provides a