On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:18:48 -0500, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote:
Runtime dependencies are not allowed in code distributed with emacs
because of RMS’s conservativism[1].
Yow! Conservatism is such a pejorative term.
But, I generally agree. We should allow cl at runtime and document the
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:18:48 -0500, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:48:02 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
My original intent of conserving a key(chord) [1] (which in
retrospect was a fairly pointless exercise in and of itself
[2,3]) seems to have
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:03:44 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:46:55 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
Make `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' more Lispy and merge into `notmuch',
eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind.
...
diff --git
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:10:27 +0200, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:46:55 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
Make `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' more Lispy and merge into `notmuch',
eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind.
What does merge mean
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:03:09 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
[...] What's wrong with '(loop ... collect ...)'?
Nothing at all. I was fixing my own patch [1] without resorting to
requiring the `cl' package at runtime :) Would be nice if we could
get rid of the compile-time
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:13:35 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:03:09 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
[...] What's wrong with '(loop ... collect ...)'?
Nothing at all. I was fixing my own patch [1] without resorting to
requiring the `cl'
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:15:55 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:13:35 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:03:09 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
[...] What's wrong with '(loop ... collect ...)'?
Nothing at all.
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:03:06 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
Hey, look - I deliberately pressed 'r' instead of 'R'!
You have remarkably malleable muscle memory.
Care to donate some to the less fortunate ? :)
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:57:53 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:48:02 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
My original intent of conserving a key(chord) [1] (which in
retrospect was a fairly pointless exercise in and of itself
[2,3]) seems to have inconspicuously morphed into an equally
questionable crusade [4] against the
Quoth Aaron Ecay on Jan 18 at 5:18 pm:
Compile-time dependencies on ‘cl’ are absolutely not a problem.
Virtually every major elisp program depends on cl at compile time.
Runtime dependencies are not allowed in code distributed with emacs
because of RMS’s conservativism[1].
Since notmuch
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:46:55 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
Make `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' more Lispy and merge into `notmuch',
eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind.
...
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el
index ef4dcc7..539b3a0 100644
---
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:46:55 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
Make `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' more Lispy and merge into `notmuch',
eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind.
What does merge mean here? Will it still be possible for me to hit one
key to unconditionally get
12 matches
Mail list logo
