On Fri, Jul 13 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Coincidentally, this also essentially enables multi-line search result
formats; the only remaining non-multi-line-capable functions are
notmuch-search-{next,previous}-thread, which are only used
interactively.
So I tried to
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Jul 14 at 12:31 pm:
On Fri, Jul 13 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Coincidentally, this also essentially enables multi-line search result
formats; the only remaining non-multi-line-capable functions are
notmuch-search-{next,previous}-thread,
Quoth myself on Jul 14 at 3:50 pm:
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Jul 14 at 12:31 pm:
On Fri, Jul 13 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
+(defmacro notmuch-search-do-results (beg end pos-sym rest body)
+ Invoke BODY for each result between BEG and END.
+
+POS-SYM will be
On Sat, Jul 14 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
That's strange. What was the error?
I've been testing with
((date . %12s )
(count . %-7s )
(authors . %-20s )
(subject . \n%s )
(tags . (%s)))
But maybe there are other cases it doesn't handle correctly?
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
This simplifies the traversal of regions of results and eliminates the
need for save-excursions (which tend to get in the way of maintaining
point when we make changes to the buffer). It also fixes some strange
corner cases in the
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Jul 14 at 2:13 pm:
On Sat, Jul 14 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
That's strange. What was the error?
I've been testing with
((date . %12s )
(count . %-7s )
(authors . %-20s )
(subject . \n%s )
(tags . (%s)))
But
On Sat, Jul 14 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
I think this is just a sharp corner in customize and there's notmuch
we can do about it. I believe the proper way to enter the newline
directly in customize is to hit C-q C-j (same way you get a raw
newline in any other buffer).
