On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:17:39 -0500, Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree. There is no good reason to switch away from the existing
infrastructure. If he wants, Carl can give regular contributors their
own repositories on notmuchmail.org if some people have difficulties
providing it
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:58:05 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Once the project becomes more mature and other developers are
vetting patches, then their branches can take over as master in the
absence of an outdated canonical master.
The other thing that will happen as
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:32:31 +1300, martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net wrote:
I discussed this with Carl at LCA a bit and ideally we should come
up with a way to relieve Carl of the bottleneck burden (obviously
without stealing away his dictator hat ;)
Sounds great! Let's keep working
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:05:42 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
I want to maintain a branch myself, (where I'm the only person pushing
to the branch). [This is different than what I've done with the cairo
repository where we have all core maintainer's pushing to a central
repository.
also sprach micah anderson mi...@riseup.net [2010.01.27.1124 +1300]:
Couldn't all of this be done without moving the existing git
repository (don't forget that transition is a cost)? Those who
wish to put together these proposed branches go ahead and do so,
publishing those wherever they like
* martin f krafft (madd...@madduck.net) wrote:
also sprach micah anderson mi...@riseup.net [2010.01.27.1124 +1300]:
Personally, I've found mailing lists that have patches sent to
them tends to totally kill the list for anything else. It seems
a bit weird to use Debian's bug tracker for a
also sprach Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org [2010.01.23.1010 +1300]:
Anyway, I'll be on vacation for the next few days, so will likely
not have much, (likely have not much?), time for patch merging.
But I *am* anxious to get back to the backlog. And in the
meantime, I really appreciate others
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:09:30 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
On 01/20/10 21:00, micah anderson wrote:
Cool! It would be useful if you provided thread-id's for each of these
so we could look them up and read more about them.
True, I'll try to include thread id-s in
