Hi,
I'm re-sending the patches which were rebased to current top of the tree. Apart
from rebasing there has been no change made. I am using this notmuch for half a
year and it seems to work fine.
As I said in my previous email, not all the tests pass, but I know that the
failures in the testing
On Fri, Aug 16 2013, Vladimir Marek wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> > > I didn't pay too much attention to the test output as it's broken on
>> > > linux too :)
>> >
>> > It shouldn't be. All tests pass for me, and we're pretty strict about
>> > maintaining that.
>> >
>> > There may be some prerequisites to
Hi,
> > > I didn't pay too much attention to the test output as it's broken on
> > > linux too :)
> >
> > It shouldn't be. All tests pass for me, and we're pretty strict about
> > maintaining that.
> >
> > There may be some prerequisites to running tests that you're missing,
> > and the test
[...]
> That must be some setting in (your?) bash:
>
> $ sh -c 'echo '\''foo\nbar'\'''
> foo
> bar
>
> $ bash -c 'echo '\''foo\nbar'\'''
> foo\nbar
>
> $ dash -c 'echo '\''foo\nbar'\'''
> foo
> bar
>
> ... after a bit digging ...
>
> $ bash -c 'shopt -s xpg_echo; echo '\''foo\nbar'\'''
> foo
On Mon, May 20 2013, Vladimir Marek wrote:
>> >> There may be some prerequisites to running tests that you're missing,
>> >> and the test setup fails to tell you about. A pastebin of the 'make
>> >> test' output might be helpful.
>> >
>> > Ok, in that case please let me take a look at the tests
> >> There may be some prerequisites to running tests that you're missing,
> >> and the test setup fails to tell you about. A pastebin of the 'make
> >> test' output might be helpful.
> >
> > Ok, in that case please let me take a look at the tests first.
> >
>
> For what it's worth, I can confirm
There may be some prerequisites to running tests that you're missing,
and the test setup fails to tell you about. A pastebin of the 'make
test' output might be helpful.
Ok, in that case please let me take a look at the tests first.
For what it's worth, I can confirm no test failures
On Mon, May 20 2013, Vladimir Marek vladimir.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
There may be some prerequisites to running tests that you're missing,
and the test setup fails to tell you about. A pastebin of the 'make
test' output might be helpful.
Ok, in that case please let me take a look at the
[...]
That must be some setting in (your?) bash:
$ sh -c 'echo '\''foo\nbar'\'''
foo
bar
$ bash -c 'echo '\''foo\nbar'\'''
foo\nbar
$ dash -c 'echo '\''foo\nbar'\'''
foo
bar
... after a bit digging ...
$ bash -c 'shopt -s xpg_echo; echo '\''foo\nbar'\'''
foo
bar
$ bash
Vladimir Marek writes:
>>
>> There may be some prerequisites to running tests that you're missing,
>> and the test setup fails to tell you about. A pastebin of the 'make
>> test' output might be helpful.
>
> Ok, in that case please let me take a look at the tests first.
>
For what it's worth,
Vladimir Marek vladimir.ma...@oracle.com writes:
There may be some prerequisites to running tests that you're missing,
and the test setup fails to tell you about. A pastebin of the 'make
test' output might be helpful.
Ok, in that case please let me take a look at the tests first.
For
> > I didn't pay too much attention to the test output as it's broken on
> > linux too :)
>
> It shouldn't be. All tests pass for me, and we're pretty strict about
> maintaining that.
>
> There may be some prerequisites to running tests that you're missing,
> and the test setup fails to tell you
On Sun, 12 May 2013, Vladimir Marek wrote:
> I didn't pay too much attention to the test output as it's broken on
> linux too :)
It shouldn't be. All tests pass for me, and we're pretty strict about
maintaining that.
There may be some prerequisites to running tests that you're missing,
and the
On Mon, 06 May 2013, Vladimir.Marek at oracle.com wrote:
> I can't run the notmuch 'make test' on Solaris (too old bash) and on linux the
> results are
>
> 421/525 tests passed.
> 25 tests failed.
> 79 tests skipped.
>
> but they are the same without my changes too ...
The series LGTM, except I
> > I can't run the notmuch 'make test' on Solaris (too old bash) and on linux
> > the
> > results are
> >
> > 421/525 tests passed.
> > 25 tests failed.
> > 79 tests skipped.
> >
> > but they are the same without my changes too ...
>
> The series LGTM, except I didn't pay much attention to the
On Mon, 06 May 2013, vladimir.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
I can't run the notmuch 'make test' on Solaris (too old bash) and on linux the
results are
421/525 tests passed.
25 tests failed.
79 tests skipped.
but they are the same without my changes too ...
The series LGTM, except I didn't pay
I can't run the notmuch 'make test' on Solaris (too old bash) and on linux
the
results are
421/525 tests passed.
25 tests failed.
79 tests skipped.
but they are the same without my changes too ...
The series LGTM, except I didn't pay much attention to the timegm()
On Sun, 12 May 2013, Vladimir Marek vladimir.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
I didn't pay too much attention to the test output as it's broken on
linux too :)
It shouldn't be. All tests pass for me, and we're pretty strict about
maintaining that.
There may be some prerequisites to running tests that
I didn't pay too much attention to the test output as it's broken on
linux too :)
It shouldn't be. All tests pass for me, and we're pretty strict about
maintaining that.
There may be some prerequisites to running tests that you're missing,
and the test setup fails to tell you about. A
Hi,
This is next series of patches adding Solaris support to notmuch. I am mostly
using what Blake Jones sent some time ago + I fixed all the comments he
received back then. Since it's mostly his work, it's IMO fair to keep
him as an author. But since I made sure the patches work, I'm signing
Hi,
This is next series of patches adding Solaris support to notmuch. I am mostly
using what Blake Jones sent some time ago + I fixed all the comments he
received back then. Since it's mostly his work, it's IMO fair to keep
him as an author. But since I made sure the patches work, I'm signing
21 matches
Mail list logo
