Hi all,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> On Thu 2017-12-21 12:30:39 +0100, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
>> The API changes a lot and there is no easy migration. And history has
>> shown that's a terrible way to get something new adopted. Last time I
>> suggested a possible multi-tiered approach (maybe
On Thu 2017-12-21 12:30:39 +0100, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
> The API changes a lot and there is no easy migration. And history has
> shown that's a terrible way to get something new adopted. Last time I
> suggested a possible multi-tiered approach (maybe not as explicit):
>
> 1 I think it's possi
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> Hi Floris--
>
> On Sun 2017-12-17 19:08:18 +0100, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
>
> i've heard reported, and i also appreciate your attention to performance
> concerns on different python platforms (e.g. making sure things are
> performant on both CPython and PyPy).
Oh b
Hi Floris--
On Sun 2017-12-17 19:08:18 +0100, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
> Thanks for all the feedback on an early post of my CFFI-based libnotmuch
> Python bindings. I've now completed these somewhat more and they now
> have most of the functionality. Here's what's new since last time:
thanks f
Hi all,
Thanks for all the feedback on an early post of my CFFI-based libnotmuch
Python bindings. I've now completed these somewhat more and they now
have most of the functionality. Here's what's new since last time:
- All tests pass on Python 3.5, 3.6 and pypy3.5
I could probably add 3.4 as
