On Fri, 20 May 2011 15:00:23 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> Is the name "cnotmuch" still current anywhere? Long ago, (perhaps a year
> ago last April when we incorporated the python bindings into the notmuch
> repository), we decided that the python bindings should be named
> "notmuch" rather than
On Fri, 20 May 2011 15:00:23 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Is the name cnotmuch still current anywhere? Long ago, (perhaps a year
ago last April when we incorporated the python bindings into the notmuch
repository), we decided that the python bindings should be named
notmuch
On Tue, 24 May 2011 10:28:02 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
I notice that notmuch/python/bindings/README does still mention
cnotmuch in some of the explanatory text.
Ooops, leftovers. Someone fix it (or I might)
I just went through this README and fixed everything
On Sat, 21 May 2011 19:50:37 +0100, Patrick Totzke wrote:
> That is surprising! I only fill the screen by iterating over an initial
> part of the iterator returned by Query.search_threads()
> I do a second query to count the messages by Query.count_messages(),
> but I'd guess that this translates
On Sat, 21 May 2011 19:50:37 +0100, Patrick Totzke
patricktot...@googlemail.com wrote:
That is surprising! I only fill the screen by iterating over an initial
part of the iterator returned by Query.search_threads()
I do a second query to count the messages by Query.count_messages(),
but I'd
Hi Again,
sorry if this comes as a repost..
Excerpts from Carl Worth's message of Fri May 20 23:00:23 +0100 2011:
> > However, as a vim user I feel that the one thing that's truly missing is a
> > maintainable, feature-rich commandline GUI.
>
> "... that's not implemented in emacs" you mean?
Hi Again,
Excerpts from Carl Worth's message of Fri May 20 23:00:23 +0100 2011:
> > However, as a vim user I feel that the one thing that's truly missing is a
> > maintainable, feature-rich commandline GUI.
>
> "... that's not implemented in emacs" you mean? ;-)
of course :D
> It's funny to me
Hi Again,
Excerpts from Carl Worth's message of Fri May 20 23:00:23 +0100 2011:
However, as a vim user I feel that the one thing that's truly missing is a
maintainable, feature-rich commandline GUI.
... that's not implemented in emacs you mean? ;-)
of course :D
It's funny to me that you
Hi Again,
sorry if this comes as a repost..
Excerpts from Carl Worth's message of Fri May 20 23:00:23 +0100 2011:
However, as a vim user I feel that the one thing that's truly missing is a
maintainable, feature-rich commandline GUI.
... that's not implemented in emacs you mean? ;-)
of
Patrick Totzke
writes:
> * use libraries wherever possible. Therefore, instead of
> programming raw curses, I go for the urwid toolkit: It's a bit like gtk,
> you create a bunch of widgets and put them together in a tree-like structure
> and the library handles redrawing the screen and
On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:47:41 +0100, Patrick Totzke wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Patrick. Welcome to notmuch.
> First of all, Thanks to everybody involved in the project. Using notmuch is
> good fun
I'm really pleased that you are finding notmuch to be fun and useful.
> However, as a vim user I feel
Hi all,
First of all, Thanks to everybody involved in the project. Using notmuch is
good fun and I totally agree that the spin-off/rewrite of sup is a great idea.
However, as a vim user I feel that the one thing that's truly missing is a
maintainable, feature-rich commandline GUI. Let's change
Hi all,
First of all, Thanks to everybody involved in the project. Using notmuch is
good fun and I totally agree that the spin-off/rewrite of sup is a great idea.
However, as a vim user I feel that the one thing that's truly missing is a
maintainable, feature-rich commandline GUI. Let's change
On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:47:41 +0100, Patrick Totzke
patricktot...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Patrick. Welcome to notmuch.
First of all, Thanks to everybody involved in the project. Using notmuch is
good fun
I'm really pleased that you are finding notmuch to be fun and useful.
Patrick Totzke patricktot...@googlemail.com
writes:
* use libraries wherever possible. Therefore, instead of
programming raw curses, I go for the urwid toolkit: It's a bit like gtk,
you create a bunch of widgets and put them together in a tree-like structure
and the library handles
15 matches
Mail list logo
