[PATCH 1/2] test: date_relative in notmuch search json output

2011-12-07 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:54:03 +0100, pazz wrote: > expect the date_relative field for thread entries > in notmuch search's json output > --- I pushed an amended version of this one (explaining why the date won't change in the future), and the next patch as well. d

Re: [PATCH 1/2] test: date_relative in notmuch search json output

2011-12-07 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:54:03 +0100, pazz patricktot...@googlemail.com wrote: expect the date_relative field for thread entries in notmuch search's json output --- I pushed an amended version of this one (explaining why the date won't change in the future), and the next patch as well. d

[PATCH 1/2] test: date_relative in notmuch search json output

2011-07-23 Thread pazz
expect the date_relative field for thread entries in notmuch search's json output --- test/json |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/json b/test/json index 5a2544c..d54bf25 100755 --- a/test/json +++ b/test/json @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ add_message

[PATCH 1/2] test: date_relative in notmuch search json output

2011-07-23 Thread pazz
expect the date_relative field for thread entries in notmuch search's json output --- test/json |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/json b/test/json index 5a2544c..d54bf25 100755 --- a/test/json +++ b/test/json @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ add_message

Re: date_relative in notmuch-search

2011-07-18 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:04:59 +0100, Patrick Totzke patricktot...@googlemail.com wrote: Thanks for the tip with git send-mail. Hi, Patrick. You might have noticed my response to Felix a little while ago. The git format-patch command outputs an email that is meant to be sent directly to the

date_relative in notmuch-search

2011-07-15 Thread Patrick Totzke
st*, followed by the patch that fixes > the issue. > > Thanks! > > jamie. ------ next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-test-date_relative-in-notmuch-search-json-output.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 1230 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuch

date_relative in notmuch-search

2011-07-15 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:22:58 +0100, Patrick Totzke wrote: > I wodered why "notmuch search --format=json" doesn't provide the > "date_relative" field for > results, as the show command does. > > I'm not expert on notmuch internals but I got it working like this: Hi, Patrick. I think this is a

date_relative in notmuch-search

2011-07-15 Thread Patrick Totzke
Hi, I wodered why "notmuch search --format=json" doesn't provide the "date_relative" field for results, as the show command does. I'm not expert on notmuch internals but I got it working like this: diff --git a/notmuch-search.c b/notmuch-search.c index faccaf7..b1adc03 100644 ---

Re: date_relative in notmuch-search

2011-07-15 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:22:58 +0100, Patrick Totzke patricktot...@googlemail.com wrote: I wodered why notmuch search --format=json doesn't provide the date_relative field for results, as the show command does. I'm not expert on notmuch internals but I got it working like this: Hi, Patrick.

Re: date_relative in notmuch-search

2011-07-15 Thread Patrick Totzke
:00 2001 From: pazz patricktot...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:36:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] test: date_relative in notmuch search json output expect the date_relative field for thread entries in notmuch search's json output --- test/json |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0

date_relative in notmuch-search

2011-07-14 Thread Patrick Totzke
Hi, I wodered why notmuch search --format=json doesn't provide the date_relative field for results, as the show command does. I'm not expert on notmuch internals but I got it working like this: diff --git a/notmuch-search.c b/notmuch-search.c index faccaf7..b1adc03 100644 ---