Re: github mirror

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Wael M. Nasreddine wrote: > > On Nov 21, 2015 5:48 AM, "Tomi Ollila" wrote: >> >> >> Exceptionally top-posting as the rest is left just for reference >> (for anyone interested and loosing the thread context) >> >>

Re: github mirror

On Nov 21, 2015 5:48 AM, "Tomi Ollila" wrote: > > > Exceptionally top-posting as the rest is left just for reference > (for anyone interested and loosing the thread context) > > Marking this as notmuch::fixed as > > https://github.com/notmuch/notmuch > > fixes this and is

Re: github mirror

Exceptionally top-posting as the rest is left just for reference (for anyone interested and loosing the thread context) Marking this as notmuch::fixed as https://github.com/notmuch/notmuch fixes this and is usually up-to-date (I use this link on one of my notmuch installations) Interestingly

Re: github mirror

Sam Halliday sam.halli...@gmail.com writes: David Mazieres dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu writes: The problem is that different imap servers store tags in different ways. Since notmuch does not use imap, it would be hard for notmuch to synchronize the tags, other than the standard

github mirror

I have now tried mu4e and I don't like it nearly as much as notmuch, so I'm sticking with this and aim to help out where notmuch falls short on tag syncing between machines :-) David Mazieres writes: > the complexity of altering files is not worth it. I agree. Immutability is a great thing. I

github mirror

Excerpts from David Mazieres's message of 2014-04-28 07:29:06 +0200: > Austin Clements writes: > > > As for storing this information directly in messages, in general, the > > notmuch community is opposed to modifying messages. This causes many > > problems, and immutable messages are more robust

github mirror

Austin Clements writes: > Quoth Sam Halliday on Apr 27 at 12:09 pm: >> But in any case, my RFE/question was this: how hard would it be to have >> an optional mode of behaviour where tags are stored in the message >> itself, so that syncing with an IMAP server (e.g. via offlineimap) >> would make

github mirror

Gaute Hope writes: >> Really what you want is an imap server built on top of the notmuch >> library. That way you could use notmuch from your desktop and then use >> imap from your phone, and everything would stay perfectly in sync. >> Implementing such a server wouldn't be that hard, but it

[Sam Halliday] Re: github mirror

On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Sam Halliday wrote: > Sorry, I replied to jani and not the list... ...and I in turn replied to the private message. Oops. Let's try again. On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Sam Halliday wrote: > In my experience the github pull review process is by far superior to > any other solution.

Re: github mirror

Austin Clements writes: Quoth Sam Halliday on Apr 27 at 12:09 pm: But in any case, my RFE/question was this: how hard would it be to have an optional mode of behaviour where tags are stored in the message itself, so that syncing with an IMAP server (e.g. via offlineimap) would make the tags

Re: github mirror

Excerpts from David Mazieres's message of 2014-04-28 07:29:06 +0200: Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu writes: As for storing this information directly in messages, in general, the notmuch community is opposed to modifying messages. This causes many problems, and immutable messages are

Re: github mirror

I have now tried mu4e and I don't like it nearly as much as notmuch, so I'm sticking with this and aim to help out where notmuch falls short on tag syncing between machines :-) David Mazieres dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu writes: the complexity of altering files is not worth it. I

github mirror

Austin Clements writes: > As for storing this information directly in messages, in general, the > notmuch community is opposed to modifying messages. This causes many > problems, and immutable messages are more robust and simplify so many > things. IMAP assumes messages are immutable. Maildir

github mirror

David Mazieres writes: > Sam Halliday writes: >> But in any case, my RFE/question was this: how hard would it be to have >> an optional mode of behaviour where tags are stored in the message >> itself, so that syncing with an IMAP server (e.g. via offlineimap) >> would make the tags available on

[Sam Halliday] Re: github mirror

and another one -- next part -- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Sam Halliday <sam.halli...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: github mirror Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:29:54 +0100 Size: 1858 URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140427

[Sam Halliday] Re: github mirror

Sorry, I replied to jani and not the list... -- next part -- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Sam Halliday <sam.halli...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: github mirror Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 18:57:47 +0100 Size: 4752 URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermai

github mirror

On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Sam Halliday wrote: > I have just started using notmuch and I really love it! I've been using > web interfaces and proprietary mail clients for almost a decade and mutt > before that (because I never got on well with rmail or gnus). Now, I'm > trying to get all my life-hacker

github mirror

Quoth Sam Halliday on Apr 27 at 12:09 pm: > But in any case, my RFE/question was this: how hard would it be to have > an optional mode of behaviour where tags are stored in the message > itself, so that syncing with an IMAP server (e.g. via offlineimap) > would make the tags available on all

github mirror

Sam Halliday writes: > David Mazieres writes: >> The problem is that different imap servers store tags in different >> ways. Since notmuch does not use imap, it would be hard for notmuch to >> synchronize the tags, other than the standard ones (for which notmuch >> already has support). >> >>

github mirror

Dear NotMuch, I have just started using notmuch and I really love it! I've been using web interfaces and proprietary mail clients for almost a decade and mutt before that (because I never got on well with rmail or gnus). Now, I'm trying to get all my life-hacker aficionados to follow suit. I was

github mirror

Sam Halliday writes: > Dear NotMuch, > > But in any case, my RFE/question was this: how hard would it be to have > an optional mode of behaviour where tags are stored in the message > itself, so that syncing with an IMAP server (e.g. via offlineimap) > would make the tags available on all

github mirror

Dear NotMuch, I have just started using notmuch and I really love it! I've been using web interfaces and proprietary mail clients for almost a decade and mutt before that (because I never got on well with rmail or gnus). Now, I'm trying to get all my life-hacker aficionados to follow suit. I was

Re: github mirror

Sam Halliday sam.halli...@gmail.com writes: Dear NotMuch, But in any case, my RFE/question was this: how hard would it be to have an optional mode of behaviour where tags are stored in the message itself, so that syncing with an IMAP server (e.g. via offlineimap) would make the tags

[Sam Halliday] Re: github mirror

Sorry, I replied to jani and not the list... ---BeginMessage--- Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes: We also maintain fairly high standards for the contributions we accept, so the review has a significant role in the process. In my experience the github pull review process is by far superior to

[Sam Halliday] Re: github mirror

and another one ---BeginMessage--- Sam Halliday sam.halli...@gmail.com writes: If I were to do anything with notmuch it would be improving syncing with gmail (so a tag in notmuch equates to a label in their interface) or at the very least sharing the same tag structure across multiple notmuch

Re: github mirror

David Mazieres dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu writes: Sam Halliday sam.halli...@gmail.com writes: But in any case, my RFE/question was this: how hard would it be to have an optional mode of behaviour where tags are stored in the message itself, so that syncing with an IMAP server (e.g.

Re: [Sam Halliday] Re: github mirror

On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Sam Halliday sam.halli...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, I replied to jani and not the list... ...and I in turn replied to the private message. Oops. Let's try again. On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Sam Halliday sam.halli...@gmail.com wrote: In my experience the github pull review process

Re: github mirror

Quoth Sam Halliday on Apr 27 at 12:09 pm: But in any case, my RFE/question was this: how hard would it be to have an optional mode of behaviour where tags are stored in the message itself, so that syncing with an IMAP server (e.g. via offlineimap) would make the tags available on all devices.

Re: github mirror

Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu writes: As for storing this information directly in messages, in general, the notmuch community is opposed to modifying messages. This causes many problems, and immutable messages are more robust and simplify so many things. IMAP assumes messages are