On Sat, 28 May 2011 14:31:08 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2011 17:53:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > * Should we set the crypto option to verify/decrypt by default?
...
> I don't really have an opinion on this. I have it set now, so whether
> or not it's set by default
On Sat, 28 May 2011 14:31:08 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 17:53:44 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
* Should we set the crypto option to verify/decrypt by default?
...
I don't really have an opinion on this. I have it set now,
On Fri, 27 May 2011 17:53:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> So, well done, Jameson! You've been extremely patient as I sat on this
> patch series for *so* long, and then made you rebuild it so many
> times. I hope you think the rebuilds were at least worth it for the much
> cleaner final state, (I
On Fri, 27 May 2011 17:53:44 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
So, well done, Jameson! You've been extremely patient as I sat on this
patch series for *so* long, and then made you rebuild it so many
times. I hope you think the rebuilds were at least worth it for the much
cleaner final
On Fri, 27 May 2011 03:27:35 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Ok. So I very much hope this patch series satisfies those who were
> bothered by the part renumbering that was happening when PGP/MIME
> parts were processed. For signed messages we no longer modify the
> parts at all, so
On Fri, 27 May 2011 03:27:35 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Ok. So I very much hope this patch series satisfies those who were
> bothered by the part renumbering that was happening when PGP/MIME
> parts were processed. For signed messages we no longer modify the
> parts at all, so
Ok. So I very much hope this patch series satisfies those who were
bothered by the part renumbering that was happening when PGP/MIME
parts were processed. For signed messages we no longer modify the
parts at all, so numbering always remains constant, and for encrypted
messages the numbering will
Ok. So I very much hope this patch series satisfies those who were
bothered by the part renumbering that was happening when PGP/MIME
parts were processed. For signed messages we no longer modify the
parts at all, so numbering always remains constant, and for encrypted
messages the numbering will
On Fri, 27 May 2011 03:27:35 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Ok. So I very much hope this patch series satisfies those who were
bothered by the part renumbering that was happening when PGP/MIME
parts were processed. For signed messages we no longer modify the
On Fri, 27 May 2011 03:27:35 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Ok. So I very much hope this patch series satisfies those who were
bothered by the part renumbering that was happening when PGP/MIME
parts were processed. For signed messages we no longer modify the
10 matches
Mail list logo
