On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:15:34 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:59:23 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:03:35 -0500, Jameson Rollins > finestructure.net> wrote:
> > > "Fcc" means something like "file cc", which means that a copy of the
> > > message
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:15:34 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:59:23 +0100, Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:03:35 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Fcc means something like file cc, which
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:03:35 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:38:00 +0100, Xavier Maillard
> wrote:
> > I am not sure I understand what Fcc and I'd be happy someone is
> > explaining this to me :)
>
> "Fcc" means something like "file cc", which means that a copy of
Hi,
I am quite late too but I just found time to upgrade from my old 0.3.1
version to this one and WOW ! The differences are really huge !
What I appreciate most at the moment: blasting performance which makes
my SSD much much more happier !
I am not sure I understand what Fcc and I'd be happy
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:59:23 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:03:35 -0500, Jameson Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > "Fcc" means something like "file cc", which means that a copy of the
> > message is written to a local directory when sending. This is useful
> > for
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:38:00 +0100, Xavier Maillard
wrote:
> I am not sure I understand what Fcc and I'd be happy someone is
> explaining this to me :)
"Fcc" means something like "file cc", which means that a copy of the
message is written to a local directory when sending. This is useful
for
Hi,
I am quite late too but I just found time to upgrade from my old 0.3.1
version to this one and WOW ! The differences are really huge !
What I appreciate most at the moment: blasting performance which makes
my SSD much much more happier !
I am not sure I understand what Fcc and I'd be happy
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:38:00 +0100, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im wrote:
I am not sure I understand what Fcc and I'd be happy someone is
explaining this to me :)
Fcc means something like file cc, which means that a copy of the
message is written to a local directory when sending. This is
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:03:35 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:38:00 +0100, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im
wrote:
I am not sure I understand what Fcc and I'd be happy someone is
explaining this to me :)
Fcc means something like file
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:59:23 +0100, Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:03:35 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Fcc means something like file cc, which means that a copy of the
message is written to a local directory when sending. This is
On 11/12/2010 12:02 AM, Carl Worth wrote:
> The major feature in notmuch 0.5 is the ability to automatically
> synchronize maildir flags, (so that if a mail file gets marked
> externally with the flag 'S' for "seen" then the "unread" tag in the
> notmuch database will be automatically removed).
On 11/12/2010 12:02 AM, Carl Worth wrote:
The major feature in notmuch 0.5 is the ability to automatically
synchronize maildir flags, (so that if a mail file gets marked
externally with the flag 'S' for seen then the unread tag in the
notmuch database will be automatically removed). And of
El 11/11/10 09:02, Carl Worth dijo:
> So, I said I was being foolhardy when I said I wanted to have 0.5 come
> just a week after 0.4. And, indeed, we missed that. But considering this
> release is only 10 days after 0.4, (where it was 6 months(!) after 0.3),
> I think we did pretty well.
El 11/11/10 09:02, Carl Worth dijo:
So, I said I was being foolhardy when I said I wanted to have 0.5 come
just a week after 0.4. And, indeed, we missed that. But considering this
release is only 10 days after 0.4, (where it was 6 months(!) after 0.3),
I think we did pretty well.
So, I said I was being foolhardy when I said I wanted to have 0.5 come
just a week after 0.4. And, indeed, we missed that. But considering this
release is only 10 days after 0.4, (where it was 6 months(!) after 0.3),
I think we did pretty well.
The major feature in notmuch 0.5 is the ability to
So, I said I was being foolhardy when I said I wanted to have 0.5 come
just a week after 0.4. And, indeed, we missed that. But considering this
release is only 10 days after 0.4, (where it was 6 months(!) after 0.3),
I think we did pretty well.
The major feature in notmuch 0.5 is the ability to
16 matches
Mail list logo
