On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:51:14AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Sebastian Spaeth
> wrote:
> > On 2010-10-06, Michal Sojka wrote:
> >> unfortunately, there is not much news. I only separate from these
> >> patches the part which synchronizes notmuch tags with
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> On 2010-10-06, Michal Sojka wrote:
>> unfortunately, there is not much news. I only separate from these
>> patches the part which synchronizes notmuch tags with maildir flags
>> (unread, replied, etc.) [1]. It works pretty well and I use
On 2010-10-06, Michal Sojka wrote:
> unfortunately, there is not much news. I only separate from these
> patches the part which synchronizes notmuch tags with maildir flags
> (unread, replied, etc.) [1]. It works pretty well and I use it to
> synchronize my mails with IMAP server. I think that
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010, Ethan Glasser-Camp wrote:
> I recently got interested in notmuch again and I wanted to see what the
> current situation is with regard to synchronization -- specifically
> multiple machines each running notmuch, but also notmuch with other
> non-notmuch clients. As far as I
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010, Ethan Glasser-Camp wrote:
I recently got interested in notmuch again and I wanted to see what the
current situation is with regard to synchronization -- specifically
multiple machines each running notmuch, but also notmuch with other
non-notmuch clients. As far as I can
On 2010-10-06, Michal Sojka wrote:
unfortunately, there is not much news. I only separate from these
patches the part which synchronizes notmuch tags with maildir flags
(unread, replied, etc.) [1]. It works pretty well and I use it to
synchronize my mails with IMAP server. I think that these
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:48:36 -0400, Ethan Glasser-Camp
wrote:
> - the message at
> http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/002957.html starts a
> thread about exactly this subject. This seems like the most promising
> approach (using unison to sync mail across all machines, and using
>
I recently got interested in notmuch again and I wanted to see what the
current situation is with regard to synchronization -- specifically
multiple machines each running notmuch, but also notmuch with other
non-notmuch clients. As far as I can tell, this is "possible" but not
easy or clean:
-
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:48:36 -0400, Ethan Glasser-Camp gla...@cs.rpi.edu
wrote:
- the message at
http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/002957.html starts a
thread about exactly this subject. This seems like the most promising
approach (using unison to sync mail across all machines,
