Add the bindings. Provide documentation that makes it clear that they
just add tags and never delete anything.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
Hi Jamie!
I have taken the time to test those patches and those in the other
thread[1], and I like it! I was able to run all tests with the patches
applied and I am now running them alongside with most recent master
gd51b784 and Mark Walter's attachment buttons patch[2].
So I support those
Add the bindings. Provide documentation that makes it clear that they
just add tags and never delete anything.
pgp3b1CEVBlBs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:01:45 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
[ ... ]
> Based on the show-mode improvements I recently sent [1], the following
> patch set implements thread and message delete keys.
>
> This is the last I'm going to comment on this issue. If we don't want
> to support
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:01:45 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Now that Austin's excellent tag exclusion patch set [0] has been pushed,
> the question remains if we want to support any delete-handling key
> bindings in emacs.
>
> Based on the show-mode improvements I recently sent [1], the
Now that Austin's excellent tag exclusion patch set [0] has been pushed,
the question remains if we want to support any delete-handling key
bindings in emacs.
Based on the show-mode improvements I recently sent [1], the following
patch set implements thread and message delete keys.
This is the
Now that Austin's excellent tag exclusion patch set [0] has been pushed,
the question remains if we want to support any delete-handling key
bindings in emacs.
Based on the show-mode improvements I recently sent [1], the following
patch set implements thread and message delete keys.
This is the
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:01:45 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Now that Austin's excellent tag exclusion patch set [0] has been pushed,
the question remains if we want to support any delete-handling key
bindings in emacs.
Based on the show-mode improvements I
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:01:45 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
[ ... ]
Based on the show-mode improvements I recently sent [1], the following
patch set implements thread and message delete keys.
This is the last I'm going to comment on this issue. If we
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:21:18 +0200, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
Looking at the source and history, I have to admit there has been
intent, and code, to have support for deleted tag. See for example
TODO or [1].
And I agree there has been demand for this.
I say let's have this.
+1
10 matches
Mail list logo