On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:01:24 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> Oh good call, Jesse. Bonus points for you! That was the problem. Damn
> it. In retrospect that's so obvious, though, isn't it! I had purged
> the notmuch binary package, but had accidentally left libnotmuch1 and
> libnotmuch-dev
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:35:17 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> Pfeww, I was getting very scared that the python bindings have serious
> flaws that I am not aware of. Don't ever do that again to me :-).
In the future, we should make sure that all new features are included
since the beginning.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:01:24 -0700, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Oh good call, Jesse. Bonus points for you! That was the problem. Damn
it. In retrospect that's so obvious, though, isn't it! I had purged
the notmuch binary package, but had accidentally left libnotmuch1
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:35:17 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
Pfeww, I was getting very scared that the python bindings have serious
flaws that I am not aware of. Don't ever do that again to me :-).
In the future, we should make sure that all new features are included
since
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:19:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> Hey, Sebastian. Can you share your notmuch.py script?
No, it's my secret plan for earning my pension :).
You already got it:
http://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch/blob/HEAD:/bindings/python/notmuch.py
Let me know what you find out.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:34:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> It's going to take a lot more digging before I can identify what is
> common about these messages and different from all the messages that are
> not returned.
One guess: do those messages happen to have "folder:sent" in the
body? If
Hmm, I'm getting the same results from the python implementation.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:32:52 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> Any suggestions about how we might go about debugging this?
One thing to try would be to run it step by step in an interactive session.
I.e.,
>>> import notmuch as
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:42:09 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:34:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > It's going to take a lot more digging before I can identify what is
> > common about these messages and different from all the messages that are
> > not
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:45:06 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
wrote:
> One thing to try would be to run it step by step in an interactive session.
> I.e.,
Hey, Jesse. So I'm getting different results interactively!:
>>> import notmuch
>>> db = notmuch.Database("/home/jrollins/.mail")
>>> query =
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:29:57 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:19:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > Hey, Sebastian. Can you share your notmuch.py script?
>
> No, it's my secret plan for earning my pension :).
> You already got it:
>
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:19:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Hey, Sebastian. Can you share your notmuch.py script?
No, it's my secret plan for earning my pension :).
You already got it:
http://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch/blob/HEAD:/bindings/python/notmuch.py
Let
Hmm, I'm getting the same results from the python implementation.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:32:52 -0700, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Any suggestions about how we might go about debugging this?
One thing to try would be to run it step by step in an interactive session.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:45:06 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote:
One thing to try would be to run it step by step in an interactive session.
I.e.,
Hey, Jesse. So I'm getting different results interactively!:
import notmuch
db = notmuch.Database(/home/jrollins/.mail)
query =
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:34:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
It's going to take a lot more digging before I can identify what is
common about these messages and different from all the messages that are
not returned.
One guess: do those messages happen to have
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:42:09 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:34:29 -0700, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
It's going to take a lot more digging before I can identify what is
common about these messages and different from all the
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:25:29 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> Interesting, this is not at all what I am seeing in the current
> bindings:
>
> cd ~/src/notmuch/bindings/python;./notmuch.py count 'folder:sent'
> 1957
> /usr/local/bin/notmuch count 'folder:sent'
> 1957
Hey, Sebastian. Can you
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:25:29 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
Interesting, this is not at all what I am seeing in the current
bindings:
cd ~/src/notmuch/bindings/python;./notmuch.py count 'folder:sent'
1957
/usr/local/bin/notmuch count 'folder:sent'
1957
Hey,
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:30:30 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> Hey, folks. I'm seeing something peculiar with the python bindings.
> It seems that I am not able to get any results when doing "folder:"
> searches with the python bindings. I'm using a version of notmuch that
> includes the folder
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:30:30 -0700, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Hey, folks. I'm seeing something peculiar with the python bindings.
It seems that I am not able to get any results when doing folder:
searches with the python bindings. I'm using a version of notmuch that
Hey, folks. I'm seeing something peculiar with the python bindings.
It seems that I am not able to get any results when doing "folder:"
searches with the python bindings. I'm using a version of notmuch that
includes the folder index patch.
Attached is a script that demonstrates the problem. It
Hey, folks. I'm seeing something peculiar with the python bindings.
It seems that I am not able to get any results when doing folder:
searches with the python bindings. I'm using a version of notmuch that
includes the folder index patch.
Attached is a script that demonstrates the problem. It
21 matches
Mail list logo
