[notmuch] modifying emacs keymap

2009-12-28 Thread Tassilo Horn
Jameson Graef Rollins writes: Hi Jameson, > (add-hook 'notmuch-search-mode > (define-key notmuch-search-mode-map "A" > 'notmuch-show-mark-read-then-archive-thread) > ) `notmuch-search-mode' is no hook, and even if it was, you couldn't add what you like, because that's no function. You

[notmuch] Building xapian+kanru patch on Debian stable

2009-12-28 Thread David Bremner
Here is a script of commands that I ran to get xapian built with Kan-Ru's patch on Debian Lenny. There is less goofing around if you are running Sid. I keep a git mirror of the xapian svn, with the patch already applied. I have been running this version of xapian for a week or so with no

[notmuch] modifying emacs keymap

2009-12-28 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
tachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091228/6466a2eb/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] modifying emacs keymap

2009-12-28 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
for the help. jamie. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091228/5e358a6a/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] modifying emacs keymap

2009-12-28 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
Hey, folks. This is the first in what is surely to be a long line of requests for help customizing the notmuch emacs UI. In this episode, I'm trying to add a function to the default keymap in notmuch-search-mode. Here's what I tried to do: (add-hook 'notmuch-search-mode (define-key

Re: [notmuch] modifying emacs keymap

2009-12-28 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:27:30PM +0100, Tassilo Horn wrote: (add-hook 'notmuch-search-mode (define-key notmuch-search-mode-map A 'notmuch-show-mark-read-then-archive-thread) ) `notmuch-search-mode' is no hook, and even if it was, you couldn't add what you like, because that's no