muchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110623/9d6ae619/attachment-0001.pgp>
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:38:42 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
>
> So, you'll want to test it, of course, but I think you can (and should)
> drop this override of RPATH_LDFLAGS from the Debian packaging now.
As you say, it seems to work without this patch. Revert pushed to
master.
d
this is now pushed, in 19f0ca7
d
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110623/fdcf7593/attachment.pgp>
notmuch_message_tags_to_maildir_flags() moves messages from maildir directory
"new/" to maildir directory "cur/", which makes messages lose their "new" status
in the MUA. However some users want to keep this "new" status after, for
instance, an auto-tagging of new messages.
This patch introduces
l.d.worth at intel.com
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110623/bc9fdcb9/attachment.pgp>
chment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110623/482e8fa8/attachment.pgp>
as scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110623/a01197cc/attachment.pgp>
d...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110623/374b342b/attachment.pgp>
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110623/3692c6f1/attachment.pgp>
t was also
embarrassing to see how many misspellings I committed while typing the
commit messages, (fortunately I rebased many away).
And now I'm starting to get paranoid about this message. Am I really
brave enough to type words like "embarrassing", "misspelling", and
"committed" here?
Thanks again,
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110623/2e40e305/attachment-0001.pgp>
h at intel.com
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110623/f26d66fd/attachment.pgp>
vailable
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110623/83d4f5dd/attachment.pgp>
hmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110623/045ca365/attachment.pgp>
another look.
David, I suggest including this fix (and its test) in the release
branch.
-Carl
--
carl.d.worth at intel.com
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL
tachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110623/c04a5eae/attachment.pgp>
plication/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110623/e6733e88/attachment.pgp>
henchmen. :)
Congrats and thanks
Sebastian
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110623/435caa50/attachment-0001.pgp>
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:02:36 -0300, david at tethera.net wrote:
> From: David Bremner
>
> The worry here is that a binary linking with libnotmuch might lose
> access to Xapian::Error symbols because libnotmuch hides them.
After some helpful feedback from jrollins and amdragon on IRC, I have
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:26:06 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
No, it's not a code name, unless you really want it to be. After some
discussion with Carl and Jamie on IRC, I have declared myself release
tyrant, with Jamie as my assistant [1].
Me bows to the tyrant and the hard-working henchmen. :)
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:13:05 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
Me bows to the tyrant and the hard-working henchmen. :)
We (henchmen) generally prefer to go by the official title of
Interim Distinguished co-Chief Vice Tyrant.
jamie.
pgp6gQsY9ndfp.pgp
Description: PGP
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:02:36 -0300, da...@tethera.net wrote:
From: David Bremner brem...@debian.org
The worry here is that a binary linking with libnotmuch might lose
access to Xapian::Error symbols because libnotmuch hides them.
After some helpful feedback from jrollins and amdragon on IRC,
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:47:56 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
The debian/control part, I would prefer it some maintainer would nod
off/merge that one.
Fortunately, that's David himself, now. :-)
This seems to all be pushed now.
David, it would help me if you would send a
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:26:43 -0300, David Bremner brem...@debian.org wrote:
As of the latest snapshot for debian experimental, I create seperate
binary packages for python bindings and for the emacs-interface. Since
the plan is to merge these changes back to master fairly soon, I'd
appreciate
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:24:08 -0300, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:02:36 -0300, da...@tethera.net wrote:
From: David Bremner brem...@debian.org
The worry here is that a binary linking with libnotmuch might lose
access to Xapian::Error symbols because
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:22:46 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:22:04 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:05:00 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
I do not think we need a test for this fix. What we need
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:14:21 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
Various typo fixes in docs, docstrings, comments, etc...
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org
Thanks for these fixes, Pieter!
I've pushed these all out now. I split the original commit up into 6
commits that
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:58:23 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I should have prepared a better commit message from the
beginning. Then no pushing might have been needed :)
That, or a test case, (which would have clued me in to read the correct
interpretation of
On Sun, 29 May 2011 01:56:49 -0700, notm...@dima.secretsauce.net wrote:
From: Dima Kogan d...@secretsauce.net
This patch corrects a typo
Thanks for the patch, Dima!
This is now fixed.
-Carl
--
carl.d.wo...@intel.com
pgp2qzhQfV4ev.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:35:58 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:20:05 -0700 (PDT), (David Bremner) wrote:
Presumably you'll be updating the debian/libnotmuch1.symbols files as
necessary next. (I assume the packaging scripts will guide you to do
that anyway.)
---
test/emacs |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/emacs b/test/emacs
index 9b5d485..6f82b08 100755
--- a/test/emacs
+++ b/test/emacs
@@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ mkdir -p mail/sent-string/new
mkdir -p mail/sent-string/tmp
test_begin_subtest notmuch-fcc-dirs
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:28:51 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Also, slightly reformat dir-locals.el so that the settings align and
to make it friendlier for future additions.
Thanks. Pushed.
-Carl
--
carl.d.wo...@intel.com
pgprBCITDA5OY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:59:33 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
---
test/emacs |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Thanks for the catch. That was left over from some debugging I was doing
while writing the patch originally.
All fixed.
-Carl
--
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:38:42 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
So, you'll want to test it, of course, but I think you can (and should)
drop this override of RPATH_LDFLAGS from the Debian packaging now.
As you say, it seems to work without this patch. Revert pushed to
master.
d
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:12:04 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Thanks for the catch. That was left over from some debugging I was doing
while writing the patch originally.
I cherry-picked all three of these into the release branch. I'm going
to skip the typo fixes for 0.6, unless
34 matches
Mail list logo
