On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:37:50 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Being also to share tags alone would be super cool.
I have no idea what this means, but I do know that tag sharing would be
super cool, and I think time stamping tag operations could help
facilitate it.
jamie.
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:12:55 +0200, Thomas Jost
wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:28:38 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> Non-text part: multipart/signed
> > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:37:35 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:36:36 +0200,
Le 20 Jul 2011 09:48, Jameson Graef Rollins a ?crit:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:17:37 +0200, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> > I just inadvertently removed the "todo" tag from all my "todo"-tagged
> > emails (about 60 of them going back several months, so I doubt I can
> > find them all again in my email
sh includes some things about prerequisites. I'll
try to use these to implement the explicit dependency on screen.
Regards,
--
Thomas/Schnouki
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110720/8472a0ef/attachment.pgp>
Hi Thomas.
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:36:36 +0200, Thomas Jost
wrote:
> Before this change, the test suite reported many failed tests on machines
> where
> screen is not installed (which is the case of many *BSD systems). This patch
> makes the test suite try to use tmux, another terminal
ch Fromm
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110720/2869dfb6/attachment.pgp>
Dear notmuch folks,
I just inadvertently removed the "todo" tag from all my "todo"-tagged
emails (about 60 of them going back several months, so I doubt I can
find them all again in my email haystack). So I have a few questions:
1. Is there currently an easy way to undo this?
2. Is there
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:48:53 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/mixed
Non-text part: multipart/signed
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:17:37 +0200, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> > I just inadvertently removed the "todo" tag from all my "todo"-tagged
> > emails (about 60 of them going
next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110720/d51b28f9/attachment.pgp>
If the notmuch.sym target does not explicitly depend on $(libnotmuch_modules),
gen-version-script.sh may be run before all the .o files are created. This can
be observed when doing a parallel build on a machine with many cores:
$ make -j
...
sh lib/gen-version-script.sh lib/notmuch.h
hmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110720/cf09f157/attachment.pgp>
Before this change, the test suite reported many failed tests on machines where
screen is not installed (which is the case of many *BSD systems). This patch
makes the test suite try to use tmux, another terminal multiplexer, if screen is
not available.
---
test/test-lib.sh | 13 +++--
1
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:38:18 +0200, Thomas Jost
wrote:
> If the notmuch.sym target does not explicitly depend on $(libnotmuch_modules),
> gen-version-script.sh may be run before all the .o files are created. This can
> be observed when doing a parallel build on a machine with many cores:
> $
tachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110720/a74ac13d/attachment-0001.pgp>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110720/fec33075/attachment.pgp>
What about encoding in notmuch the elements composing the line, print
the elements with a separator that would be encoded if it appears in
an element, then do the reverse in emacs. One such encoding might be
URL-encoding.
Servilio
Before this change, the test suite reported many failed tests on machines where
screen is not installed (which is the case of many *BSD systems). This patch
makes the test suite try to use tmux, another terminal multiplexer, if screen is
not available.
---
test/test-lib.sh | 13 +++--
1
Hi Thomas.
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:36:36 +0200, Thomas Jost schno...@schnouki.net wrote:
Before this change, the test suite reported many failed tests on machines
where
screen is not installed (which is the case of many *BSD systems). This patch
makes the test suite try to use tmux, another
Dear notmuch folks,
I just inadvertently removed the todo tag from all my todo-tagged
emails (about 60 of them going back several months, so I doubt I can
find them all again in my email haystack). So I have a few questions:
1. Is there currently an easy way to undo this?
2. Is there currently
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:17:37 +0200, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
I just inadvertently removed the todo tag from all my todo-tagged
emails (about 60 of them going back several months, so I doubt I can
find them all again in my email haystack). So I have a few questions:
Hey, Alex.
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:38:18 +0200, Thomas Jost schno...@schnouki.net wrote:
If the notmuch.sym target does not explicitly depend on $(libnotmuch_modules),
gen-version-script.sh may be run before all the .o files are created. This can
be observed when doing a parallel build on a machine with
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:28:38 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:37:35 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:36:36 +0200, Thomas Jost schno...@schnouki.net
wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:12:55 +0200, Thomas Jost schno...@schnouki.net wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:28:38 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:37:35 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:48:53 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/mixed
Non-text part: multipart/signed
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:17:37 +0200, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
I just inadvertently removed the todo tag from all my todo-tagged
Le 20 Jul 2011 09:48, Jameson Graef Rollins a écrit:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:17:37 +0200, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
I just inadvertently removed the todo tag from all my todo-tagged
emails (about 60 of them going back several months, so I doubt I can
find them all again in my
Quoth myself on Jul 13 at 2:57 pm:
Quoth Pieter Praet on Jul 13 at 4:16 pm:
Jamie Zawinski once said/wrote [1]:
'Some people, when confronted with a problem, think I know,
I'll use regular expressions. Now they have two problems.'
With this in mind, I set out to get rid of this
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 15:31:31 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
I think this could be simplified a lot and many of the known issues
addressed if this were narrowed to *only* resuming from drafts.
message-mode draft files aren't MIME messages (or, at least, they're
never multipart,
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 22:02:47 +0200, Olivier Schwander
olivier.schwan...@chadok.info wrote:
I wonder if it may be possible to create a journal of all the operations
on tags: a file where all the changes are registered, with a timestamp.
Two benefits:
- going through the history to undo
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:36:43 -0400, Antoine Beaupré anar...@koumbit.org wrote:
I think this is a great idea. Unfortunately, I had a lot of trouble
making message-mode digest an existing buffer. For example, if you take
any existing buffer and call (message-mode) on it, you will notice it
will
If the notmuch.sym target does not explicitly depend on $(libnotmuch_modules),
gen-version-script.sh may be run before all the .o files are created, for
example when doing a parallel build on a machine with many cores.
---
Hi David,
Here's an updated version of the patch with a shorter commit
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:31:37 +0200, Thomas Jost schno...@schnouki.net wrote:
Here's an updated version of the patch with a shorter commit message.
For the record, the build log I sent earlier was obtained on my work PC, which
has two 8-core CPUs. No problem on my laptop with its dual-core
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:37:50 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 22:02:47 +0200, Olivier Schwander
olivier.schwan...@chadok.info wrote:
I wonder if it may be possible to create a journal of all the operations
on tags: a file where all the
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:37:50 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Being also to share tags alone would be super cool.
I have no idea what this means, but I do know that tag sharing would be
super cool, and I think time stamping tag operations could help
facilitate it.
33 matches
Mail list logo