On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 20:12:59 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
... so we need to switch Emacs over to using the JSON search format
first.
Is anyone working on this? I made an attempt ages ago[1], but have not kept
it working.
Footnotes:
[1]
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 23:48:29 +0200, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
emacs: add support for replying just to the sender
emacs: bind 'r' to reply-to-sender and 'R' to reply-to-all
These both look fine to me.
pgpfNyC5jXkFy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 07:53:54 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:03:19 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
---
- Prefix the branch name with 'review/'
- Avoid `shell-command', which also results in better error reporting
when 'git-am' fails.
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:56:19 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote:
What do you think of this approach related to your way cloning the
repo and then deleting/creating the branch. Just that developer may
mess with the repository contents and then there is tedious working
tree cleanup to
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 20:12:59 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth Aaron Ecay on Jan 08 at 7:56 pm:
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:32:16 +0200, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
[...]
In the show view it only modifies the messages that are currently
visible. This is to
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 00:52:42 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon awg+notm...@xvx.ca
wrote:
+(defun w3m-region (start end)) ;; From `w3m.el'.
+(defun notmuch-mua-quote-part (part)
+ (with-temp-buffer
+(insert part)
+(message-mode)
+(fill-region (point-min) (point-max))
+(goto-char
On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 23:23:15 +, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com
wrote:
I like this version (of the whole series) but have two queries. (Note I
haven't actually tried it out yet: I have just been reading the code.)
+ /* Force recipient type in reply-to-sender mode just in case
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:23:53 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 07:53:54 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:03:19 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
---
- Prefix the branch name with 'review/'
- Avoid
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:41:15 +, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 20:12:59 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth Aaron Ecay on Jan 08 at 7:56 pm:
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:32:16 +0200, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
[...]
In the show
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:38:58 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote:
The downside is that there's still a race condition: you could get new
messages between checking the number of messages in the thread and
tagging. The window for error would be much smaller than now, but it's
still
The reply-to-thread is a rare case anyway, regardless of reply-to-all or
reply-to-sender, and even the current implementation does not gather all
the recipients from all the messages. Try it out, it seems to me it does
not quite do what you think it does.
IMHO it should use oldest-first
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 06:38:54 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
Oh. It's supposed to delete the existing branch. It did in my test. What
happens for you?
FWIW, I loaded notmuch-dev.el on top of current master.
The magit buffer shows
$ git --no-pager checkout -b
There's been quite a bit of discussion on fixing this properly. See,
for example
id:CAH-f9WsPj=1Eu=g3soepjgctbfs6hrldlq18xmenj8az00y...@mail.gmail.com.
The gist is that we need to include message IDs (or document IDs) in
the search output and use these in tagging operations, rather than the
---
This is against release branch.
---
NEWS | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 85ff65b..687154d 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
Notmuch 0.11 (201x-xx-xx)
=
-New command-line features
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 07:58:16 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
I have tagged 0.11_rc2 and uploaded 0.11~rc2-1 to Debian experimental.
This includes only the single non-doc commit, fixing a python bindings
segfault. NEWS items are still solicited.
OK, I have tagged 0.11_rc3 and
Quoting David Bremner (2012-01-08 23:34:26)
On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:24:06 -, Justus Winter
4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de wrote:
I'm having trouble with nmbug, I did follow the instructions in this
mail and in the wiki, but nmbug never adds tags to my notmuch database
(it is supposed to
On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 18:49:56 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Thanks so much for the review, Aaron.
>
> On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:08:59 -0500, Aaron Ecay wrote:
> > A couple of comments on the arguments:
> > - It would be good to make show-next This will enable code
> > to call the fn
Hurray, thanks Justus. That is much appreciated.
Spaetz
David Bremner schrieb:
>On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:16:06 -, Justus Winter
><4winter at informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> I've decided to step up as a new maintainer for the libnotmuch python
>> bindings. I assume that I'll have to
at dme.org"
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120109/8468968e/attachment.pgp>
.
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120109/97ea1154/attachment.pgp>
the existing branch. It did in my test. What
happens for you?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120109/b8ec2a5a/attachment.pgp>
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120109/52699756/attachment.pgp>
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 20:12:59 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Aaron Ecay on Jan 08 at 7:56 pm:
> > On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:32:16 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > In the show view it only modifies the messages that are currently
> > > visible. This is to make sure you don't
notmuch-mua-quote-part
> (notmuch-mua-parse-html-part part) html-parts)))
If you have an 'else' clause, why test '(if (not ..' ?
> +(setq body (concat body "\n"))
> +
If it already ends with a carriage return, why do this?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120109/f04f6f96/attachment.pgp>
On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 23:23:15 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
>
> I like this version (of the whole series) but have two queries. (Note I
> haven't actually tried it out yet: I have just been reading the code.)
>
> > + /* Force recipient type in reply-to-sender mode just in case replying to
> > +
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:23:53 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 07:53:54 -0400, David Bremner
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:03:19 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > ---
> > >
> > > - Prefix the branch name with 'review/'
> > > - Avoid `shell-command', which also
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:41:15 +, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 20:12:59 -0500, Austin Clements
> wrote:
> > Quoth Aaron Ecay on Jan 08 at 7:56 pm:
> > > On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:32:16 +0200, Jani Nikula
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > In the show view it only
cking...
Or another process could change the tags, meaning that the number stayed
the same but the set changed.
(Wh)
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<
Quoting Sebastian Spaeth (2012-01-02 16:23:05)
>Hi, just tried to apply but it doesn't apply cleanly anymore, can you
>update the patch to latest master?
no need: you already pushed these three patches on Dec 6, if i'm not mistaken.
best,
/p
>
> The reply-to-thread is a rare case anyway, regardless of reply-to-all or
> reply-to-sender, and even the current implementation does not gather all
> the recipients from all the messages. Try it out, it seems to me it does
> not quite do what you think it does.
>
> IMHO it should use
l-dme at dme.org\"")
> notmuch-dev-show-review-patch()
> call-interactively(notmuch-dev-show-review-patch t nil)
> execute-extended-command(nil)
> call-interactively(execute-extended-command nil nil)
Could you try running
(notmuch-dev-delete-branch
"review/patch-emacs-don't-signal-an-error-when-reaching-the-end-of-the-search-results")
when inside that repository please?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120109/855010a1/attachment.pgp>
> There's been quite a bit of discussion on fixing this properly. See,
> for example
> id:"CAH-f9WsPj=1Eu=g3sOePJgCTBFs6HrLdLq18xMEnJ8aZ00yCEg at mail.gmail.com".
> The gist is that we need to include message IDs (or document IDs) in
> the search output and use these in tagging operations,
---
This is against release branch.
---
NEWS | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 85ff65b..687154d 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
Notmuch 0.11 (201x-xx-xx)
=
-New command-line features
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 07:58:16 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>
>
> I have tagged 0.11_rc2 and uploaded 0.11~rc2-1 to Debian experimental.
> This includes only the single non-doc commit, fixing a python bindings
> segfault. NEWS items are still solicited.
OK, I have tagged 0.11_rc3 and pushed
Hi Jeremy, notmuch -developers,
* Jeremy Nickurak [08. Jan. 2012]:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 14:48, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> It seemed to me that most people wanted this, and nobody spoke for keeping
>> the old binding now that we have reply-to-sender. This as a separate patch
>> so it's easy to
Quoting David Bremner (2012-01-08 23:34:26)
>On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:24:06 -, Justus Winter <4winter at
>informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
>
>> I'm having trouble with nmbug, I did follow the instructions in this
>> mail and in the wiki, but nmbug never adds tags to my notmuch database
>> (it
s great to hear, Justus. Thanks for stepping up!
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120109/5dc7aa62/attachment.pgp>
Hi Jani.
I prefer to leave the Emacs UI default reply behavior as is.
Changing it in CLI would not affect me, but I think the default should
be the same as in the Emacs UI.
Regards,
Dmitry
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 18:27, Aaron Ecay wrote:
>> +(defun w3m-region (start end)) ;; From `w3m.el'.
>
> What is the purpose of the above line? ?If it is to make the compiler
> aware of the function, you should use ?declare-function? instead. ?Defun
> will erase the original definition of the
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:49:56 +, Jani Nikula wrote:
> ---
>
> This is against release branch.
> ---
Pushed to release.
d
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:57:22 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
> ---
> man/man1/notmuch-reply.1 |3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
+1
/Xavier
FWIW, here's the patch I ended up using to play with this:
diff --git a/mutt_notmuch.c b/mutt_notmuch.c
index 2f21407..a07b1ba 100644
--- a/mutt_notmuch.c
+++ b/mutt_notmuch.c
@@ -636,11 +636,15 @@ char *nm_uri_from_query(CONTEXT *ctx, char *buf,
size_t bufsz)
?static notmuch_message_t
Thanks for the suggestions. Specific comments inline:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 18:36, Aaron Ecay wrote:
>> There should probably be some customize variables for this in emacs, to
>> control
>> (for example) whether to quote HTML parts and whether to prefer HTML or
>> plaintext parts for quoting.
Hi David,
Thanks for the review. Most of the things you've suggested are easy
changes, and I think obvious improvements, so I'll change them for the
next version. A bit of discussion on the more involved things below:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 01:50, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sun, ?8 Jan 2012
44 matches
Mail list logo
