Some messages are sent as multipart/alternative but the alternatives
contain different information. This allows the user to cycle which
part to view. By default this is bound to 'W'.
---
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18 2012, Mark
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:49:19 +0100 (BST), Sepp Tannhuber
sepp.tannhu...@yahoo.de wrote:
Dear Anton,
for some reason the file did not exist here. Perhaps I deleted it
accidentally. So I cloned the
repository again. And there it is.
Now I'm trying if it is useful for me. I changed some code
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
Some messages are sent as multipart/alternative but the alternatives
contain different information. This allows the user to cycle which
part to view. By default this is bound to 'W'.
---
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012, Jameson Graef
On Fri, Aug 10 2012, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
How would this work together with something like [1] (rationale in [2])?
[1]
id:ab777cf0fa83778d3399ac52094df9230738819d.1328798471.git.j...@nikula.org
[2] id:cover.1328719309.git.j...@nikula.org
If you introduce a mechanism to store
On Aug 10, 2012 7:18 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10 2012, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
How would this work together with something like [1] (rationale in [2])?
[1] id:
ab777cf0fa83778d3399ac52094df9230738819d.1328798471.git.j...@nikula.org
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
On Aug 10, 2012 7:18 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10 2012, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
How would this work together with something like [1] (rationale in [2])?
[1] id:
On Fri, Aug 10 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not sure I agree: I think maybe toggling parts is better. Either
the parts contain the same information and then the current behaviour is
probably fine, or they are not in which case we might want to see both
at once
If
Some messages are sent as multipart/alternative but the alternatives
contain different information. This allows the user to cycle which
part to view. By default this is bound to 'W'.
---
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
>> I agree
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:49:19 +0100 (BST), Sepp Tannhuber wrote:
> Dear Anton,
>
> for some reason the file did not exist here. Perhaps I deleted it
> accidentally. So I cloned the
> repository again. And there it is.
> Now I'm trying?if it is useful for me. I changed some code that I can use
>
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
> Some messages are sent as multipart/alternative but the alternatives
> contain different information. This allows the user to cycle which
> part to view. By default this is bound to 'W'.
> ---
>
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins
> wrote:
>>
parts is really what we want. Is there a
strong need to show multiple alternative parts at the exact same time?
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http:
part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120810/486b027d/attachment.html>
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2012 7:18 PM, "Jameson Graef Rollins" finestructure.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 10 2012, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> > How would this work together with something like [1] (rationale in [2])?
>> >
>> > [1] id:"
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
