This happens when there is some garbage after the last Message-ID in
the References header. See for example
https://lkml.org/lkml/headers/2014/5/19/864.
---
test/T510-thread-replies.sh | 28
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/test/T510-thread-replies.sh
Hi all,
I noticed that in certain situations notmuch does not reconstruct
thread structure correctly. The fix was quite trivial - see the
patches.
The patch fixes my problem, however, as I learnt from the thread
around id:87oazwjq1e@yoom.home.cworth.org, there are more problems
in this code.
On 2014-05-23 at 23:25, Wael Nasreddine wael.nasredd...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22.07.2012 02:24, Daniel Bergey wrote:
Glad to hear I have another user!
My function bbdb/notmuch-snarf-to doesn't work yet on more than one
recipient. Once I get that working, I'd like to do what you suggest,
and have
Hi
I think notmuch-search-tag (and other tagging functions) were cleaned up
for 0.17: in particular their interactive behaviour
changed. notmuch-search-tag now only looks at the region if called
interactively. I think the following would do what you want
(define-key notmuch-search-mode-map "d"
Hi all,
I noticed that in certain situations notmuch does not reconstruct
thread structure correctly. The fix was quite trivial - see the
patches.
The patch fixes my problem, however, as I learnt from the thread
around id:87oazwjq1e.fsf at yoom.home.cworth.org, there are more problems
in this
According to RFC2822 References and In-Reply-To headers are supposed
to contain one or more Message-IDs, however older RFC822 allowed
almost any content. When both References and In-Reply-To headers ends
with something else that a Message-ID (see e.g. [1]), the thread
structure presented by
This happens when there is some garbage after the last Message-ID in
the References header. See for example
https://lkml.org/lkml/headers/2014/5/19/864.
---
test/T510-thread-replies.sh | 28
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/test/T510-thread-replies.sh
On 2014-05-23 at 23:25, Wael Nasreddine wrote:
> On 22.07.2012 02:24, Daniel Bergey wrote:
>>Glad to hear I have another user!
>>
>>My function bbdb/notmuch-snarf-to doesn't work yet on more than one
>>recipient. Once I get that working, I'd like to do what you suggest,
>>and have some hook call