On Tue, Nov 25 2014, David Bremner wrote:
>> +A symbol corresponding to an attribute of the
>> + thread (e.g. `:date_relative' or `:subject').
>
> It'd be nice for the user to have a pointer here to figure out what
> the possible attributes are.
I don't believe that we currently document these any
Alternative implementation of code that interprets
`notmuch-search-result-format' to insert the results of a search.
---
Added some more documentation, as per bremner.
emacs/notmuch.el | 300 +--
1 file changed, 178 insertions(+), 122 deletions
Olivier Berger writes:
>
> In any case, there has been a change in the way this worked.
That's strange, but since it is currently working as we expect, the main
question is whether we should change how excludes work.
>
> For the moment, I'm using the following saved search :
> (tag:deleted
David Edmondson writes:
> Consider:
>
> : disaster-area; notmuch search --output=files
> id:87hbph5yww@aw.hh.sledj.net
> /home/dme/Maildir/mail/list/notmuch/xx01550
> : disaster-area; notmuch search --duplicate=2 --output=files
> id:87hbph5yww@aw.hh.sledj.net
> : disaster-area; notmuch
David Edmondson writes:
> Alternative implementation of code that interprets
> `notmuch-search-result-format' to insert the results of a search.
> ---
>
> First pass at this. Thoughts?
The general direction looks very nice.
> +A symbol corresponding to an attribute of the
> + thread (e.g. `:dat
On Tue, Nov 25 2014, David Bremner wrote:
>> +A symbol corresponding to an attribute of the
>> + thread (e.g. `:date_relative' or `:subject').
>
> It'd be nice for the user to have a pointer here to figure out what
> the possible attributes are.
I don't believe that we currently document these any
Alternative implementation of code that interprets
`notmuch-search-result-format' to insert the results of a search.
---
Added some more documentation, as per bremner.
emacs/notmuch.el | 300 +--
1 file changed, 178 insertions(+), 122 deletions
Olivier Berger writes:
>
> In any case, there has been a change in the way this worked.
That's strange, but since it is currently working as we expect, the main
question is whether we should change how excludes work.
>
> For the moment, I'm using the following saved search :
> (tag:deleted
David Edmondson writes:
> Consider:
>
> : disaster-area; notmuch search --output=files id:87hbph5yww.fsf at
> aw.hh.sledj.net
> /home/dme/Maildir/mail/list/notmuch/xx01550
> : disaster-area; notmuch search --duplicate=2 --output=files
> id:87hbph5yww.fsf at aw.hh.sledj.net
> : disaster-area; no
