Hi,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:47:00PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
>
> Is it possible to search based on which message ID a message
> *responds* to? For example, suppose message id is MESSAGEID. I want to
> find all emails that responded to MESSAGEID. How to enter such a query
> into notmuch?
AFAIK,
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:44:46PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
>
> Thank you. The problem in the end is that I would like 'notmuch new'
> to not only schronize the 'reply' tag but to master handle the reply
> tag because notmuch knows which messages have been replied to (because
> it is aware of
Hi Xu. I may be misunderstanding your email, but it sounds like you want to
know if a message has *any* reply message. That's not what the replied tag
indicates. The replied tag indicates that *you* have sent a reply to a message.
Mechanically, when you hit, say, r to start a reply and then
Dear all,
Is it possible to search based on which message ID a message
*responds* to? For example, suppose message id is MESSAGEID. I want to
find all emails that responded to MESSAGEID. How to enter such a query
into notmuch?
Kind regards,
Xu
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Xu Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Xu Wang wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> First, I am extremely excited to be a part of this list now. notmuch
>>> has really helped me. Thank you go all individuals working
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:24 PM, Jinwoo Lee wrote:
> That error is from 'cd bindings/ruby && ruby extconf.rb --vendor' BTW.
The contents of mkmf.log are below. It shows a warning about
-L/usr/local/lib and I don't have the directory /usr/local/lib on my
machine. I'm not sure if that's the
That error is from 'cd bindings/ruby && ruby extconf.rb --vendor' BTW.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:11 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> Jinwoo Lee writes:
>
>>> I with configure has an option to skip the ruby-bindings build.
>>
>> `configure' seems to try to detect whether the ruby development tools
>> are installed. It thinks I have them but I don't actually, and that's
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 01:46 PM, Jinwoo Lee wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Jinwoo Lee wrote:
>> This breaks Mac OS X. ruby-bindings depends on lib/libnotmuch.so but it
>> should be lib/libnotmuch.dylib on OS X.
>>
>> That makes `make' and `make install' fail.
>
> Even after I
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Jinwoo Lee wrote:
> This breaks Mac OS X. ruby-bindings depends on lib/libnotmuch.so but it
> should be lib/libnotmuch.dylib on OS X.
>
> That makes `make' and `make install' fail.
Even after I update the dependency to lib/libnotmuch.dylib, building
This breaks Mac OS X. ruby-bindings depends on lib/libnotmuch.so but it
should be lib/libnotmuch.dylib on OS X.
That makes `make' and `make install' fail.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:37 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> David Bremner writes:
>
>> Because ruby generates a Makefile, we have to use
Hi!
Thanks for your response!
On 11/06, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> date:today-1week..today
>In other words, date:1w..
>The reference for relative dates is "now" if one is not specified.
>The minus sign means nothing, relative dates all refer to the past
>and are added together.
That's good enough
Change the key binding for filter (or "limit") in search-mode. This
gives consistency with the new filter in show-mode, and frees 'f' for
forward-thread in the future.
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el
Show the current thread with a different filter (i.e., open messages
in the thread matching the new query).
Bound to 'l' for "limit".
Note that it is not the same as filter in search mode as it replaces
the existing query rather than ANDing with it (but it does keep the
thread-id part of the
Separate out a notmuch-show-goto-msg-id sub-function from
notmuch-show-apply-state. There should be no functional change but the
next patch will call the new function.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 18 +++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git
The previous version of this patch was over 3 years ago at
id:1335658006-20161-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009 at gmail.com
The reason the patch stopped was that it marked messages read (removed
the unread tag) spuriously (see Austin's review
id:20120429005736.GK2704 at mit.edu) and this was
Display the attachment size in kB or MB in the part button. This uses
the content-length header and guesses the actual size from that, so
the value will be close but not exact.
---
This patch adds some text to the part button saying how big the part
is. This is particularly useful when running
David Bremner writes:
> Because ruby generates a Makefile, we have to use recursive make.
> Because mkmf.rb hardcodes the name Makefile, put our Makefile{.local}
> in the parent directory.
Pushed the first patch in the series. Let's see if anything breaks.
d
Mark Walters writes:
> Add keybinding c q to stash the current query in search mode.
> ---
>
pushed. If you're going to complain about the keybinding, please do it
soon before everyone else gets used to it.
d
Dear Suvayu and Austin,
Thank you for your attempts to understand my goals. I apologize for
the lack in the clarity of my previous messages. Thank you kindly for
your persistence and thank you to Suvayu for suggestions on adding
more information.
I am indeed using mutt-kz, along with
Jinwoo Lee jinwo...@gmail.com writes:
ld: unknown option: --no-undefined
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see
invocation)
I wonder if this the actual relevant error. Can you try with the next
two patches in the series?
Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com writes:
Dear David and Suvayu,
Thank you for your ideas. My goal is to do something like the following:
notmuch search tag:reply-required and not tag:replied
which was discussed here:
http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/002558.html
This recent blog
Hi Xu. I may be misunderstanding your email, but it sounds like you want to
know if a message has *any* reply message. That's not what the replied tag
indicates. The replied tag indicates that *you* have sent a reply to a message.
Mechanically, when you hit, say, r to start a reply and then
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 5:14 PM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com writes:
Dear all,
Is it possible to search based on which message ID a message
*responds* to? For example, suppose message id is MESSAGEID. I want to
find all emails that responded to
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
First, I am extremely excited to be a part of this list now. notmuch
has really helped me. Thank you go all individuals working to improve
it and to help
David Bremner da...@tethera.net writes:
Because ruby generates a Makefile, we have to use recursive make.
Because mkmf.rb hardcodes the name Makefile, put our Makefile{.local}
in the parent directory.
Pushed the first patch in the series. Let's see if anything breaks.
d
Separate out a notmuch-show-goto-msg-id sub-function from
notmuch-show-apply-state. There should be no functional change but the
next patch will call the new function.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 18 +++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git
Show the current thread with a different filter (i.e., open messages
in the thread matching the new query).
Bound to 'l' for limit.
Note that it is not the same as filter in search mode as it replaces
the existing query rather than ANDing with it (but it does keep the
thread-id part of the
The previous version of this patch was over 3 years ago at
id:1335658006-20161-1-git-send-email-markwalters1...@gmail.com
The reason the patch stopped was that it marked messages read (removed
the unread tag) spuriously (see Austin's review
id:20120429005736.gk2...@mit.edu) and this was difficult
Change the key binding for filter (or limit) in search-mode. This
gives consistency with the new filter in show-mode, and frees 'f' for
forward-thread in the future.
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el
Hi!
Thanks for your response!
On 11/06, Jani Nikula wrote:
date:today-1week..today
In other words, date:1w..
The reference for relative dates is now if one is not specified.
The minus sign means nothing, relative dates all refer to the past
and are added together.
That's good enough for my
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
First, I am extremely excited to be a part of this list now. notmuch
has really helped me.
This breaks Mac OS X. ruby-bindings depends on lib/libnotmuch.so but it
should be lib/libnotmuch.dylib on OS X.
That makes `make' and `make install' fail.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:37 PM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
David Bremner da...@tethera.net writes:
Because ruby generates a
Dear all,
Is it possible to search based on which message ID a message
*responds* to? For example, suppose message id is MESSAGEID. I want to
find all emails that responded to MESSAGEID. How to enter such a query
into notmuch?
Kind regards,
Xu
___
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Jinwoo Lee jinwo...@gmail.com wrote:
This breaks Mac OS X. ruby-bindings depends on lib/libnotmuch.so but it
should be lib/libnotmuch.dylib on OS X.
That makes `make' and `make install' fail.
Even after I update the dependency to lib/libnotmuch.dylib,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 01:46 PM, Jinwoo Lee jinwo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Jinwoo Lee jinwo...@gmail.com wrote:
This breaks Mac OS X. ruby-bindings depends on lib/libnotmuch.so but it
should be lib/libnotmuch.dylib on OS X.
That makes `make' and `make install'
Jinwoo Lee jinwo...@gmail.com writes:
I with configure has an option to skip the ruby-bindings build.
`configure' seems to try to detect whether the ruby development tools
are installed. It thinks I have them but I don't actually, and that's
why my build fails. When I manually set
Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com writes:
Dear all,
Is it possible to search based on which message ID a message
*responds* to? For example, suppose message id is MESSAGEID. I want to
find all emails that responded to MESSAGEID. How to enter such a query
into notmuch?
Threads aren't exactly the
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:11 PM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
Jinwoo Lee jinwo...@gmail.com writes:
I with configure has an option to skip the ruby-bindings build.
`configure' seems to try to detect whether the ruby development tools
are installed. It thinks I have them but I
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:44:46PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
Thank you. The problem in the end is that I would like 'notmuch new'
to not only schronize the 'reply' tag but to master handle the reply
tag because notmuch knows which messages have been replied to (because
it is aware of
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:47:00PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
Is it possible to search based on which message ID a message
*responds* to? For example, suppose message id is MESSAGEID. I want to
find all emails that responded to MESSAGEID. How to enter such a query
into notmuch?
AFAIK, this
That error is from 'cd bindings/ruby ruby extconf.rb --vendor' BTW.
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:24 PM, Jinwoo Lee jinwo...@gmail.com wrote:
That error is from 'cd bindings/ruby ruby extconf.rb --vendor' BTW.
The contents of mkmf.log are below. It shows a warning about
-L/usr/local/lib and I don't have the directory /usr/local/lib on my
machine. I'm not sure if
43 matches
Mail list logo
