search query "replytoid:"
Hi, On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:47:00PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote: > > Is it possible to search based on which message ID a message > *responds* to? For example, suppose message id is MESSAGEID. I want to > find all emails that responded to MESSAGEID. How to enter such a query > into notmuch? AFAIK, this is not possible. Notmuch does not allow searching special headers. You could probably write a script using the threads output format to get the thread, and then use formail to find the responses. I however think you are probably approaching the problem incorrectly, but that's just a guess. More information about what is your goal and why, would help. Maybe there is another way to achieve what you want to achieve. Hope this helps, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.
Understanding the "replied" tag
Hi, On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:44:46PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote: > > Thank you. The problem in the end is that I would like 'notmuch new' > to not only schronize the 'reply' tag but to master handle the reply > tag because notmuch knows which messages have been replied to (because > it is aware of threads). Sorry, I have no idea what you are saying. It would help a lot if you explicitly state what you tried, what you expected, and what you saw. For example, you still haven't mentioned that you are using mutt-kz as your MUA. I know that because we had an earlier discussion on mutt-users. It is very hard to suggest something without knowing precisely what you tried. Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.
Understanding the "replied" tag
Hi Xu. I may be misunderstanding your email, but it sounds like you want to know if a message has *any* reply message. That's not what the replied tag indicates. The replied tag indicates that *you* have sent a reply to a message. Mechanically, when you hit, say, r to start a reply and then send that message, notmuch tags the message you hit r on as "replied". That's the only time notmuch automatically sets this tag. On June 11, 2015 10:25:44 AM PDT, Xu Wang wrote: >Dear all, > >First, I am extremely excited to be a part of this list now. notmuch >has really helped me. Thank you go all individuals working to improve >it and to help others to know how to use it. > >I would really like to know if a message has been replied to (e.g. >using a certain message id). It seems that all I need to do is check >for the "replied" tag. But often this tag is not there, even when >there has been a reply (I have confirmed this through the thread >display and checking the message that replied to the message to make >sure it indeed has header "replied-to:"). > >I have looked in mutt, and also I see many situations where there is >no 'r' flag, especially for emails sent from me. > >The following returns true: >notmuch config get maildir.synchronize_flags > >So at least both are giving same answer, but I'm not sure why not >saying "replied" thread is correct. > >What is incorrect for my way of thinking about "replied"? Do I >misunderstand what it is supposed to do or am I not updating the flags >correctly? > >Kind regards, > >Xu >___ >notmuch mailing list >notmuch at notmuchmail.org >http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
search query "replytoid:"
Dear all, Is it possible to search based on which message ID a message *responds* to? For example, suppose message id is MESSAGEID. I want to find all emails that responded to MESSAGEID. How to enter such a query into notmuch? Kind regards, Xu
Understanding the "replied" tag
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Xu Wang wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Xu Wang wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> First, I am extremely excited to be a part of this list now. notmuch >>> has really helped me. Thank you go all individuals working to improve >>> it and to help others to know how to use it. >>> >>> I would really like to know if a message has been replied to (e.g. >>> using a certain message id). It seems that all I need to do is check >>> for the "replied" tag. But often this tag is not there, even when >>> there has been a reply (I have confirmed this through the thread >>> display and checking the message that replied to the message to make >>> sure it indeed has header "replied-to:"). >>> >>> I have looked in mutt, and also I see many situations where there is >>> no 'r' flag, especially for emails sent from me. >>> >>> The following returns true: >>> notmuch config get maildir.synchronize_flags >>> >>> So at least both are giving same answer, but I'm not sure why not >>> saying "replied" thread is correct. >>> >>> What is incorrect for my way of thinking about "replied"? Do I >>> misunderstand what it is supposed to do or am I not updating the flags >>> correctly? >> >> Notmuch deals with the "replied" tag in two ways. >> >> First, the tag is synchronized with the maildir flag R, both ways. This >> is the "R" in the filename after ":2,". See [1] for details. >> >> Second, the notmuch-emacs interface adds the "replied" tag upon sending >> the reply. You can customize this tag, but note that only "replied" gets >> synchronized to maildir flags. >> >> If you use a MUA that doesn't either add the R flag or call notmuch to >> add the "replied" tag, you'll lose this bit of information. >> >> You might also find [2] relevant. >> >> BR, >> Jani. >> >> >> [1] http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html >> [2] http://notmuchmail.org/special-tags/ > > Thank you so much, Jani. This is very informative to me. I think I > have a good understanding now of what is going on. > > My question then is this: > > I trust notmuch more than mutt, because notmuch is aware of threads > and all mail boxes. Also note that I often use gmail web interface to > reply emails. > > Am I correct in the following: if notmuch wanted to, when I run > "notmuch new", notmuch has the information that it could > (theoretically) update and correct all of the "replied" tags. Is that > correct? If so, my next question is: why doesn't it do that? > > I think I'm close to getting notmuch intution on its goals. > > Kind regards, The following message is in response to Suvayu (I am now finally subscribed to the list so I will have no future problem): Thank you. The problem in the end is that I would like 'notmuch new' to not only schronize the 'reply' tag but to master handle the reply tag because notmuch knows which messages have been replied to (because it is aware of threads). Kind regards, Xu
[patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:24 PM, Jinwoo Lee wrote:
> That error is from 'cd bindings/ruby && ruby extconf.rb --vendor' BTW.
The contents of mkmf.log are below. It shows a warning about
-L/usr/local/lib and I don't have the directory /usr/local/lib on my
machine. I'm not sure if that's the cause of the error though. I don't
write Ruby and know nothing about it.
"xcrun clang -o conftest -I../../lib
-I/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/include/ruby-2.0.0/universal-darwin14
-I/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/include/ruby-2.0.0/ruby/backward
-I/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/include/ruby-2.0.0
-I. -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_DARWIN_C_SOURCE -D_DARWIN_UNLIMITED_SELECT -D_REENTRANT
-g -Os -pipe -DHAVE_GCC_SYNC_BUILTINS conftest.c -L.
-L/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib -L.
-L/usr/local/lib -Wl,--no-undefined -arch x86_64 -arch i386 -lruby.2.0.0
-lpthread -ldl -lobjc "
ld: warning: directory not found for option '-L/usr/local/lib'
ld: unknown option: --no-undefined
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
checked program was:
/* begin */
1: #include "ruby.h"
2:
3: int main(int argc, char **argv)
4: {
5: return 0;
6: }
/* end */
[patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
That error is from 'cd bindings/ruby && ruby extconf.rb --vendor' BTW.
[patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:11 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> Jinwoo Lee writes:
>
>>> I with configure has an option to skip the ruby-bindings build.
>>
>> `configure' seems to try to detect whether the ruby development tools
>> are installed. It thinks I have them but I don't actually, and that's
>> why my build fails. When I manually set 'HAVE_RUBY_DEV = 0' in
>> Makefile.config, everything's fine.
>
> Thanks for narrowing this down. Can you tell us the output of
>
> % ruby -e "require 'mkmf'" ; echo $?
This command succeeds and returns 0.
When I change the dependency of ruby-bindings from libnotmuch.so to
libnotmuch.dylib and run `make', I get errors like below.
Looks like mkmf.rb (I have no idea what this is) is provided by OS X by
default, but actually running it fails.
...
[snip]
...
checking for notmuch_database_create in libnotmuch.so... *** extconf.rb failed
***
Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of necessary
libraries and/or headers. Check the mkmf.log file for more details. You may
need configuration options.
Provided configuration options:
--with-opt-dir
--without-opt-dir
--with-opt-include
--without-opt-include=${opt-dir}/include
--with-opt-lib
--without-opt-lib=${opt-dir}/lib
--with-make-prog
--without-make-prog
--srcdir=.
--curdir
--ruby=/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/bin/ruby
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:434:in
`try_do': The compiler failed to generate an executable file. (RuntimeError)
You have to install development tools first.
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:513:in
`block in try_link0'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/tmpdir.rb:88:in
`mktmpdir'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:510:in
`try_link0'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:534:in
`try_link'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:720:in
`try_func'
from extconf.rb:19:in `block in have_local_library'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:895:in
`block in checking_for'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:340:in
`block (2 levels) in postpone'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:310:in
`open'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:340:in
`block in postpone'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:310:in
`open'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:336:in
`postpone'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:894:in
`checking_for'
from extconf.rb:17:in `have_local_library'
from extconf.rb:25:in `'
make: *** [ruby-bindings] Error 1
[patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 01:46 PM, Jinwoo Lee wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Jinwoo Lee wrote: >> This breaks Mac OS X. ruby-bindings depends on lib/libnotmuch.so but it >> should be lib/libnotmuch.dylib on OS X. >> >> That makes `make' and `make install' fail. > > Even after I update the dependency to lib/libnotmuch.dylib, building > ruby-bindings fails because I don't have the ruby development tools > installed on my machine. > > I with configure has an option to skip the ruby-bindings build. `configure' seems to try to detect whether the ruby development tools are installed. It thinks I have them but I don't actually, and that's why my build fails. When I manually set 'HAVE_RUBY_DEV = 0' in Makefile.config, everything's fine.
[patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Jinwoo Lee wrote:
> This breaks Mac OS X. ruby-bindings depends on lib/libnotmuch.so but it
> should be lib/libnotmuch.dylib on OS X.
>
> That makes `make' and `make install' fail.
Even after I update the dependency to lib/libnotmuch.dylib, building
ruby-bindings fails because I don't have the ruby development tools
installed on my machine.
I with configure has an option to skip the ruby-bindings build.
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:37 PM, David Bremner wrote:
>> David Bremner writes:
>>
>>> Because ruby generates a Makefile, we have to use recursive make.
>>> Because mkmf.rb hardcodes the name Makefile, put our Makefile{.local}
>>> in the parent directory.
>>
>> Pushed the first patch in the series. Let's see if anything breaks.
>>
>> d
>> ___
>> notmuch mailing list
>> notmuch at notmuchmail.org
>> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
[patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
This breaks Mac OS X. ruby-bindings depends on lib/libnotmuch.so but it
should be lib/libnotmuch.dylib on OS X.
That makes `make' and `make install' fail.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:37 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> David Bremner writes:
>
>> Because ruby generates a Makefile, we have to use recursive make.
>> Because mkmf.rb hardcodes the name Makefile, put our Makefile{.local}
>> in the parent directory.
>
> Pushed the first patch in the series. Let's see if anything breaks.
>
> d
> ___
> notmuch mailing list
> notmuch at notmuchmail.org
> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Syntactic sugar for range syntax
Hi! Thanks for your response! On 11/06, Jani Nikula wrote: >> date:today-1week..today >In other words, date:1w.. >The reference for relative dates is "now" if one is not specified. >The minus sign means nothing, relative dates all refer to the past >and are added together. That's good enough for my purposes. The man page could be a bit clearer on that, I'll try to send a patch later. With kind regards, Robert Künnemann
[PATCH v5 3/3] emacs: Bind filter in search to 'l'
Change the key binding for filter (or "limit") in search-mode. This gives consistency with the new filter in show-mode, and frees 'f' for forward-thread in the future. --- emacs/notmuch.el | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el index 6564816..06e3b94 100644 --- a/emacs/notmuch.el +++ b/emacs/notmuch.el @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ (defvar notmuch-search-mode-map (define-key map "o" 'notmuch-search-toggle-order) (define-key map "c" 'notmuch-search-stash-map) (define-key map "t" 'notmuch-search-filter-by-tag) -(define-key map "f" 'notmuch-search-filter) +(define-key map "l" 'notmuch-search-filter) (define-key map [mouse-1] 'notmuch-search-show-thread) (define-key map "*" 'notmuch-search-tag-all) (define-key map "a" 'notmuch-search-archive-thread) @@ -983,7 +983,7 @@ (defun notmuch-search-toggle-order () (notmuch-search-refresh-view)) (defun notmuch-search-filter (query) - "Filter the current search results based on an additional query string. + "Filter or LIMIT the current search results based on an additional query string. Runs a new search matching only messages that match both the current search results AND the additional query string provided." -- 2.1.4
[PATCH v5 2/3] emacs: add a filter option to show
Show the current thread with a different filter (i.e., open messages
in the thread matching the new query).
Bound to 'l' for "limit".
Note that it is not the same as filter in search mode as it replaces
the existing query rather than ANDing with it (but it does keep the
thread-id part of the query).
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 12
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el
index a978d3c..4dee34b 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-show.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch-show.el
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
(declare-function notmuch-tree "notmuch-tree"
( query query-context target buffer-name
open-target))
(declare-function notmuch-tree-get-message-properties "notmuch-tree" nil)
+(declare-function notmuch-read-query "notmuch" (prompt))
(defcustom notmuch-message-headers '("Subject" "To" "Cc" "Date")
"Headers that should be shown in a message, in this order.
@@ -1372,6 +1373,7 @@ (defvar notmuch-show-mode-map
(define-key map (kbd "") 'notmuch-show-previous-button)
(define-key map (kbd "TAB") 'notmuch-show-next-button)
(define-key map "f" 'notmuch-show-forward-message)
+(define-key map "l" 'notmuch-show-filter-thread)
(define-key map "r" 'notmuch-show-reply-sender)
(define-key map "R" 'notmuch-show-reply)
(define-key map "|" 'notmuch-show-pipe-message)
@@ -1660,6 +1662,16 @@ (defun notmuch-show-command-hook ()
(save-excursion
(funcall notmuch-show-mark-read-function (window-start) (window-end)
+(defun notmuch-show-filter-thread (query)
+ "Filter or LIMIT the current thread based on a new query string.
+
+Reshows the current thread with matches defined by the new query-string."
+ (interactive (list (notmuch-read-query "Filter thread: ")))
+ (let ((msg-id (notmuch-show-get-message-id)))
+(setq notmuch-show-query-context (if (string= query "") nil query))
+(notmuch-show-refresh-view t)
+(notmuch-show-goto-message msg-id)))
+
;; Functions for getting attributes of several messages in the current
;; thread.
--
2.1.4
[PATCH v5 1/3] emacs: split notmuch-show-apply-state
Separate out a notmuch-show-goto-msg-id sub-function from notmuch-show-apply-state. There should be no functional change but the next patch will call the new function. --- emacs/notmuch-show.el | 18 +++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el index 2a53461..a978d3c 100644 --- a/emacs/notmuch-show.el +++ b/emacs/notmuch-show.el @@ -1281,6 +1281,16 @@ (defun notmuch-show-get-query () ")") notmuch-show-thread-id)) +(defun notmuch-show-goto-message (msg-id) + "Go to message with msg-id." + (goto-char (point-min)) + (unless (loop if (string= msg-id (notmuch-show-get-message-id)) + return t + until (not (notmuch-show-goto-message-next))) +(goto-char (point-min)) +(message "Message-id not found.")) + (notmuch-show-message-adjust)) + (defun notmuch-show-apply-state (state) "Apply STATE to the current buffer. @@ -1298,13 +1308,7 @@ (defun notmuch-show-apply-state (state) until (not (notmuch-show-goto-message-next))) ;; Go to the previously open message. -(goto-char (point-min)) -(unless (loop if (string= current (notmuch-show-get-message-id)) - return t - until (not (notmuch-show-goto-message-next))) - (goto-char (point-min)) - (message "Previously current message not found.")) -(notmuch-show-message-adjust))) +(notmuch-show-goto-message current))) (defun notmuch-show-refresh-view ( reset-state) "Refresh the current view. -- 2.1.4
[PATCH v5 0/3] Add filter to emacs show mode
The previous version of this patch was over 3 years ago at id:1335658006-20161-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009 at gmail.com The reason the patch stopped was that it marked messages read (removed the unread tag) spuriously (see Austin's review id:20120429005736.GK2704 at mit.edu) and this was difficult to fix. However, now the unread handling has been updated this is no longer a problem. (More precisely, since the unread handling is done in the command loop hook the unread tag only gets updated after notmuch has displayed the final result.) There are two small questions with this version that I would appreciate views on. First it binds the filter/limit to l since f is already bound to forward in show mode. It changes the binding in search mode to match but that may annoy a lot of people who have got f for filter into muscle memory. If we prefer to leave the keybinding in search mode as it is then we can just drop the final patch. Secondly what should the behaviour be if the user just gives and empty filter query? This patch just opens all messages in the thread (ie it treats the query as matching everything). Alternatively, it could just exit without refreshing the buffer in that case. Best wishes Mark Mark Walters (3): emacs: split notmuch-show-apply-state emacs: add a filter option to show emacs: Bind filter in search to 'l' emacs/notmuch-show.el | 30 +++--- emacs/notmuch.el | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 2.1.4
[RFC PATCH] emacs: show: show attachment size
Display the attachment size in kB or MB in the part button. This uses the content-length header and guesses the actual size from that, so the value will be close but not exact. --- This patch adds some text to the part button saying how big the part is. This is particularly useful when running notmuch over ssh but may be informative anyway. One particular question is am I putting sizes on the correct parts? This patch puts a size on all parts where we know the size and it is not hidden ( part buttons of the form [ text/html (hidden) (30kB) ] looked messy). There are a couple of caveats with the patch. First the size is approximate. This is because gmime/notmuch only outputs the encoded size. We guess the true size is roughly 3/4 the encoded size if it is base64 encoded and the encoded size otherwise. (See id:20120807232414.GA22132 at hili.localdomain and Austin's reply.) Secondly, lots of tests fail. This is expected as the output for any message with attachment has changed. I thought I would see whether people liked the idea, and which parts people think need a size before fixing them. Best wishes Mark emacs/notmuch-show.el | 26 +- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el index 2a53461..f26e2f8 100644 --- a/emacs/notmuch-show.el +++ b/emacs/notmuch-show.el @@ -488,6 +488,25 @@ (define-button-type 'notmuch-show-part-button-type 'face 'message-mml :supertype 'notmuch-button-type) +(defun notmuch-show-part-pretty-size (part) + "Return a nicely formatted string of the approximate part size in kB or MB if known" + ;; We guess the size from the encoded length (which is all + ;; gmime tells us). If it is base64 encoded the size will be + ;; approximately 3/4 of the encoded size, otherwise (e.g. if it + ;; is quoted printable) the size is probably pretty close to + ;; the encoded size. + (let ((approx-size (if (string= (plist-get part :content-transfer-encoding) "base64") +(/ (* (plist-get part :content-length) 3) 4) + (plist-get part :content-length +(cond ((not approx-size) + nil) + ((< approx-size 100) + (format " (%s kB)" (1+ (/ approx-size 1000 + ((< approx-size 1000) + (format " (%s.%s MB)" (/ approx-size 100) (% (/ approx-size 10) 10))) + (t + (format " (%s MB)" (/ approx-size 100)) + (defun notmuch-show-insert-part-header (nth content-type declared-type name comment) (let ((button) (base-label (concat (when name (concat name ": ")) @@ -948,11 +967,16 @@ (defun notmuch-show-insert-bodypart (msg part depth hide) (> notmuch-show-max-text-part-size 0) (> (length (plist-get part :content)) notmuch-show-max-text-part-size))) (beg (point)) +(pretty-size (unless hide (notmuch-show-part-pretty-size part))) ;; We omit the part button for the first (or only) part if ;; this is text/plain, or HIDE is 'no-buttons. (button (unless (or (equal hide 'no-buttons) (and (string= mime-type "text/plain") (<= nth 1))) - (notmuch-show-insert-part-header nth mime-type content-type (plist-get part :filename + (notmuch-show-insert-part-header nth + mime-type + content-type + (plist-get part :filename) + pretty-size))) ;; Hide the part initially if HIDE is t, or if it is too long ;; and we have a button to allow toggling (thus reply which ;; uses 'no-buttons automatically includes long parts) -- 2.1.4
[patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
David Bremner writes:
> Because ruby generates a Makefile, we have to use recursive make.
> Because mkmf.rb hardcodes the name Makefile, put our Makefile{.local}
> in the parent directory.
Pushed the first patch in the series. Let's see if anything breaks.
d
[PATCH] emacs search: stash query
Mark Walters writes: > Add keybinding c q to stash the current query in search mode. > --- > pushed. If you're going to complain about the keybinding, please do it soon before everyone else gets used to it. d
Re: Understanding the replied tag
Dear Suvayu and Austin, Thank you for your attempts to understand my goals. I apologize for the lack in the clarity of my previous messages. Thank you kindly for your persistence and thank you to Suvayu for suggestions on adding more information. I am indeed using mutt-kz, along with offlineimap, on Ubuntu 15.04. I have written the following information the other email thread I started (perhaps I should have added it as a reply here, but I thought it might be sufficiently a different topic). I will copy the information I gave there on my goal here: My goal is to do something like the following: notmuch search tag:reply-required and not tag:replied which was discussed here: http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/002558.html However, instead of conditioning on tag:reply-required, I would like to look at this for a specific message. For example, if I write an important message, I can do the following: save the message id, and then in 5 days set a cron script to check whether my message was responded to. If it was not responded to I will take some action to notify myself (haven't decided what yet). It is the If it was not responded to part that this email thread is about. I am now realizing that I cannot use mutt's tag replied because I often send and read email from gmail or other IMap clients (e.g. phone). Because of this (I believe), the reply tag does not get set when it should (well not should but rather when I want it to). For example, I often have abc -def - ghi where the message def does not have the replied tag, even though it was replied to (ghi replied to it). I think the reason is what I suggested above. Yes, indeed Austin was correct about where my misunderstanding was. I do indeed want to see if *any* reply was to a certain message id, but the replied tag is apparently for my own replying. Because I cannot use the replied tag (unless I have misunderstood), I thought I could just check using the message id with 'notmuch search repliedto:messageid', but Suvayu points out that searching for this is not supported. Kind regards, Xu On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Austin Clements acleme...@csail.mit.edu wrote: Hi Xu. I may be misunderstanding your email, but it sounds like you want to know if a message has *any* reply message. That's not what the replied tag indicates. The replied tag indicates that *you* have sent a reply to a message. Mechanically, when you hit, say, r to start a reply and then send that message, notmuch tags the message you hit r on as replied. That's the only time notmuch automatically sets this tag. On June 11, 2015 10:25:44 AM PDT, Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, First, I am extremely excited to be a part of this list now. notmuch has really helped me. Thank you go all individuals working to improve it and to help others to know how to use it. I would really like to know if a message has been replied to (e.g. using a certain message id). It seems that all I need to do is check for the replied tag. But often this tag is not there, even when there has been a reply (I have confirmed this through the thread display and checking the message that replied to the message to make sure it indeed has header replied-to:MSG-ID). I have looked in mutt, and also I see many situations where there is no 'r' flag, especially for emails sent from me. The following returns true: notmuch config get maildir.synchronize_flags So at least both are giving same answer, but I'm not sure why not saying replied thread is correct. What is incorrect for my way of thinking about replied? Do I misunderstand what it is supposed to do or am I not updating the flags correctly? Kind regards, Xu ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: [patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
Jinwoo Lee jinwo...@gmail.com writes: ld: unknown option: --no-undefined clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) I wonder if this the actual relevant error. Can you try with the next two patches in the series? id:1433142542-2307-3-git-send-email-da...@tethera.net id:1433142542-2307-4-git-send-email-da...@tethera.net This first alone may fix it, but it would be good to know if the next one breaks anything on Mac OS. ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: search query replytoid:blah
Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com writes: Dear David and Suvayu, Thank you for your ideas. My goal is to do something like the following: notmuch search tag:reply-required and not tag:replied which was discussed here: http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/002558.html This recent blog report looks related to your goal: https://tomasz.buchert.pl/blog/2015/06/14/notmuch-response/ ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: Understanding the replied tag
Hi Xu. I may be misunderstanding your email, but it sounds like you want to know if a message has *any* reply message. That's not what the replied tag indicates. The replied tag indicates that *you* have sent a reply to a message. Mechanically, when you hit, say, r to start a reply and then send that message, notmuch tags the message you hit r on as replied. That's the only time notmuch automatically sets this tag. On June 11, 2015 10:25:44 AM PDT, Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, First, I am extremely excited to be a part of this list now. notmuch has really helped me. Thank you go all individuals working to improve it and to help others to know how to use it. I would really like to know if a message has been replied to (e.g. using a certain message id). It seems that all I need to do is check for the replied tag. But often this tag is not there, even when there has been a reply (I have confirmed this through the thread display and checking the message that replied to the message to make sure it indeed has header replied-to:MSG-ID). I have looked in mutt, and also I see many situations where there is no 'r' flag, especially for emails sent from me. The following returns true: notmuch config get maildir.synchronize_flags So at least both are giving same answer, but I'm not sure why not saying replied thread is correct. What is incorrect for my way of thinking about replied? Do I misunderstand what it is supposed to do or am I not updating the flags correctly? Kind regards, Xu ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: search query replytoid:blah
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 5:14 PM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com writes: Dear all, Is it possible to search based on which message ID a message *responds* to? For example, suppose message id is MESSAGEID. I want to find all emails that responded to MESSAGEID. How to enter such a query into notmuch? Threads aren't exactly the concept you ask for, because the include the messages before the message-id in question as well. Nonetheless, maybe the following helps: % notmuch show $(notmuch search --output=threads $MESAGEID) or % notmuch search --output=messages $(notmuch search --output=threads $MESAGEID) Dear David and Suvayu, Thank you for your ideas. My goal is to do something like the following: notmuch search tag:reply-required and not tag:replied which was discussed here: http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/002558.html However, instead of conditioning on tag:reply-required, I would like to look at this for a specific message. For example, if I write an important message, I can do the following: save the message id, and then in 5 days set a cron script to check whether my message was responded to. If it was not responded to I will take some action to notify myself (haven't decided what yet). It is the If it was not responded to part that this email thread is about. I am now realizing that I cannot use mutt's tag replied because I often send and read email from gmail or other IMap clients (e.g. phone). Because of this (I believe), the reply tag does not get set when it should (well not should but rather when I want it to). For example, I often have abc -def - ghi where the message def does not have the replied tag, even though it was replied to (ghi replied to it). I think the reason is what I suggested above. Because I cannot use the replied tag (unless I have misunderstood), I thought I could just check using the message id with 'notmuch search repliedto:messageid', but Suvayu points out that searching for this is not supported. Kind regards, Xu ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: Understanding the replied tag
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote: On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, First, I am extremely excited to be a part of this list now. notmuch has really helped me. Thank you go all individuals working to improve it and to help others to know how to use it. I would really like to know if a message has been replied to (e.g. using a certain message id). It seems that all I need to do is check for the replied tag. But often this tag is not there, even when there has been a reply (I have confirmed this through the thread display and checking the message that replied to the message to make sure it indeed has header replied-to:MSG-ID). I have looked in mutt, and also I see many situations where there is no 'r' flag, especially for emails sent from me. The following returns true: notmuch config get maildir.synchronize_flags So at least both are giving same answer, but I'm not sure why not saying replied thread is correct. What is incorrect for my way of thinking about replied? Do I misunderstand what it is supposed to do or am I not updating the flags correctly? Notmuch deals with the replied tag in two ways. First, the tag is synchronized with the maildir flag R, both ways. This is the R in the filename after :2,. See [1] for details. Second, the notmuch-emacs interface adds the replied tag upon sending the reply. You can customize this tag, but note that only replied gets synchronized to maildir flags. If you use a MUA that doesn't either add the R flag or call notmuch to add the replied tag, you'll lose this bit of information. You might also find [2] relevant. BR, Jani. [1] http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html [2] http://notmuchmail.org/special-tags/ Thank you so much, Jani. This is very informative to me. I think I have a good understanding now of what is going on. My question then is this: I trust notmuch more than mutt, because notmuch is aware of threads and all mail boxes. Also note that I often use gmail web interface to reply emails. Am I correct in the following: if notmuch wanted to, when I run notmuch new, notmuch has the information that it could (theoretically) update and correct all of the replied tags. Is that correct? If so, my next question is: why doesn't it do that? I think I'm close to getting notmuch intution on its goals. Kind regards, Xu ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: [patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
David Bremner da...@tethera.net writes:
Because ruby generates a Makefile, we have to use recursive make.
Because mkmf.rb hardcodes the name Makefile, put our Makefile{.local}
in the parent directory.
Pushed the first patch in the series. Let's see if anything breaks.
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
[PATCH v5 1/3] emacs: split notmuch-show-apply-state
Separate out a notmuch-show-goto-msg-id sub-function from notmuch-show-apply-state. There should be no functional change but the next patch will call the new function. --- emacs/notmuch-show.el | 18 +++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el index 2a53461..a978d3c 100644 --- a/emacs/notmuch-show.el +++ b/emacs/notmuch-show.el @@ -1281,6 +1281,16 @@ (defun notmuch-show-get-query () )) notmuch-show-thread-id)) +(defun notmuch-show-goto-message (msg-id) + Go to message with msg-id. + (goto-char (point-min)) + (unless (loop if (string= msg-id (notmuch-show-get-message-id)) + return t + until (not (notmuch-show-goto-message-next))) +(goto-char (point-min)) +(message Message-id not found.)) + (notmuch-show-message-adjust)) + (defun notmuch-show-apply-state (state) Apply STATE to the current buffer. @@ -1298,13 +1308,7 @@ (defun notmuch-show-apply-state (state) until (not (notmuch-show-goto-message-next))) ;; Go to the previously open message. -(goto-char (point-min)) -(unless (loop if (string= current (notmuch-show-get-message-id)) - return t - until (not (notmuch-show-goto-message-next))) - (goto-char (point-min)) - (message Previously current message not found.)) -(notmuch-show-message-adjust))) +(notmuch-show-goto-message current))) (defun notmuch-show-refresh-view (optional reset-state) Refresh the current view. -- 2.1.4 ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
[PATCH v5 2/3] emacs: add a filter option to show
Show the current thread with a different filter (i.e., open messages in the thread matching the new query). Bound to 'l' for limit. Note that it is not the same as filter in search mode as it replaces the existing query rather than ANDing with it (but it does keep the thread-id part of the query). --- emacs/notmuch-show.el | 12 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el index a978d3c..4dee34b 100644 --- a/emacs/notmuch-show.el +++ b/emacs/notmuch-show.el @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ (declare-function notmuch-tree notmuch-tree (optional query query-context target buffer-name open-target)) (declare-function notmuch-tree-get-message-properties notmuch-tree nil) +(declare-function notmuch-read-query notmuch (prompt)) (defcustom notmuch-message-headers '(Subject To Cc Date) Headers that should be shown in a message, in this order. @@ -1372,6 +1373,7 @@ (defvar notmuch-show-mode-map (define-key map (kbd backtab) 'notmuch-show-previous-button) (define-key map (kbd TAB) 'notmuch-show-next-button) (define-key map f 'notmuch-show-forward-message) +(define-key map l 'notmuch-show-filter-thread) (define-key map r 'notmuch-show-reply-sender) (define-key map R 'notmuch-show-reply) (define-key map | 'notmuch-show-pipe-message) @@ -1660,6 +1662,16 @@ (defun notmuch-show-command-hook () (save-excursion (funcall notmuch-show-mark-read-function (window-start) (window-end) +(defun notmuch-show-filter-thread (query) + Filter or LIMIT the current thread based on a new query string. + +Reshows the current thread with matches defined by the new query-string. + (interactive (list (notmuch-read-query Filter thread: ))) + (let ((msg-id (notmuch-show-get-message-id))) +(setq notmuch-show-query-context (if (string= query ) nil query)) +(notmuch-show-refresh-view t) +(notmuch-show-goto-message msg-id))) + ;; Functions for getting attributes of several messages in the current ;; thread. -- 2.1.4 ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
[PATCH v5 0/3] Add filter to emacs show mode
The previous version of this patch was over 3 years ago at id:1335658006-20161-1-git-send-email-markwalters1...@gmail.com The reason the patch stopped was that it marked messages read (removed the unread tag) spuriously (see Austin's review id:20120429005736.gk2...@mit.edu) and this was difficult to fix. However, now the unread handling has been updated this is no longer a problem. (More precisely, since the unread handling is done in the command loop hook the unread tag only gets updated after notmuch has displayed the final result.) There are two small questions with this version that I would appreciate views on. First it binds the filter/limit to l since f is already bound to forward in show mode. It changes the binding in search mode to match but that may annoy a lot of people who have got f for filter into muscle memory. If we prefer to leave the keybinding in search mode as it is then we can just drop the final patch. Secondly what should the behaviour be if the user just gives and empty filter query? This patch just opens all messages in the thread (ie it treats the query as matching everything). Alternatively, it could just exit without refreshing the buffer in that case. Best wishes Mark Mark Walters (3): emacs: split notmuch-show-apply-state emacs: add a filter option to show emacs: Bind filter in search to 'l' emacs/notmuch-show.el | 30 +++--- emacs/notmuch.el | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 2.1.4 ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
[PATCH v5 3/3] emacs: Bind filter in search to 'l'
Change the key binding for filter (or limit) in search-mode. This gives consistency with the new filter in show-mode, and frees 'f' for forward-thread in the future. --- emacs/notmuch.el | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el index 6564816..06e3b94 100644 --- a/emacs/notmuch.el +++ b/emacs/notmuch.el @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ (defvar notmuch-search-mode-map (define-key map o 'notmuch-search-toggle-order) (define-key map c 'notmuch-search-stash-map) (define-key map t 'notmuch-search-filter-by-tag) -(define-key map f 'notmuch-search-filter) +(define-key map l 'notmuch-search-filter) (define-key map [mouse-1] 'notmuch-search-show-thread) (define-key map * 'notmuch-search-tag-all) (define-key map a 'notmuch-search-archive-thread) @@ -983,7 +983,7 @@ (defun notmuch-search-toggle-order () (notmuch-search-refresh-view)) (defun notmuch-search-filter (query) - Filter the current search results based on an additional query string. + Filter or LIMIT the current search results based on an additional query string. Runs a new search matching only messages that match both the current search results AND the additional query string provided. -- 2.1.4 ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: Syntactic sugar for range syntax
Hi! Thanks for your response! On 11/06, Jani Nikula wrote: date:today-1week..today In other words, date:1w.. The reference for relative dates is now if one is not specified. The minus sign means nothing, relative dates all refer to the past and are added together. That's good enough for my purposes. The man page could be a bit clearer on that, I'll try to send a patch later. With kind regards, Robert Künnemann ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: Understanding the replied tag
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote: On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, First, I am extremely excited to be a part of this list now. notmuch has really helped me. Thank you go all individuals working to improve it and to help others to know how to use it. I would really like to know if a message has been replied to (e.g. using a certain message id). It seems that all I need to do is check for the replied tag. But often this tag is not there, even when there has been a reply (I have confirmed this through the thread display and checking the message that replied to the message to make sure it indeed has header replied-to:MSG-ID). I have looked in mutt, and also I see many situations where there is no 'r' flag, especially for emails sent from me. The following returns true: notmuch config get maildir.synchronize_flags So at least both are giving same answer, but I'm not sure why not saying replied thread is correct. What is incorrect for my way of thinking about replied? Do I misunderstand what it is supposed to do or am I not updating the flags correctly? Notmuch deals with the replied tag in two ways. First, the tag is synchronized with the maildir flag R, both ways. This is the R in the filename after :2,. See [1] for details. Second, the notmuch-emacs interface adds the replied tag upon sending the reply. You can customize this tag, but note that only replied gets synchronized to maildir flags. If you use a MUA that doesn't either add the R flag or call notmuch to add the replied tag, you'll lose this bit of information. You might also find [2] relevant. BR, Jani. [1] http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html [2] http://notmuchmail.org/special-tags/ Thank you so much, Jani. This is very informative to me. I think I have a good understanding now of what is going on. My question then is this: I trust notmuch more than mutt, because notmuch is aware of threads and all mail boxes. Also note that I often use gmail web interface to reply emails. Am I correct in the following: if notmuch wanted to, when I run notmuch new, notmuch has the information that it could (theoretically) update and correct all of the replied tags. Is that correct? If so, my next question is: why doesn't it do that? I think I'm close to getting notmuch intution on its goals. Kind regards, The following message is in response to Suvayu (I am now finally subscribed to the list so I will have no future problem): Thank you. The problem in the end is that I would like 'notmuch new' to not only schronize the 'reply' tag but to master handle the reply tag because notmuch knows which messages have been replied to (because it is aware of threads). Kind regards, Xu ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: [patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
This breaks Mac OS X. ruby-bindings depends on lib/libnotmuch.so but it
should be lib/libnotmuch.dylib on OS X.
That makes `make' and `make install' fail.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:37 PM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
David Bremner da...@tethera.net writes:
Because ruby generates a Makefile, we have to use recursive make.
Because mkmf.rb hardcodes the name Makefile, put our Makefile{.local}
in the parent directory.
Pushed the first patch in the series. Let's see if anything breaks.
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
search query replytoid:blah
Dear all, Is it possible to search based on which message ID a message *responds* to? For example, suppose message id is MESSAGEID. I want to find all emails that responded to MESSAGEID. How to enter such a query into notmuch? Kind regards, Xu ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: [patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Jinwoo Lee jinwo...@gmail.com wrote:
This breaks Mac OS X. ruby-bindings depends on lib/libnotmuch.so but it
should be lib/libnotmuch.dylib on OS X.
That makes `make' and `make install' fail.
Even after I update the dependency to lib/libnotmuch.dylib, building
ruby-bindings fails because I don't have the ruby development tools
installed on my machine.
I with configure has an option to skip the ruby-bindings build.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:37 PM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
David Bremner da...@tethera.net writes:
Because ruby generates a Makefile, we have to use recursive make.
Because mkmf.rb hardcodes the name Makefile, put our Makefile{.local}
in the parent directory.
Pushed the first patch in the series. Let's see if anything breaks.
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: [patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 01:46 PM, Jinwoo Lee jinwo...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Jinwoo Lee jinwo...@gmail.com wrote: This breaks Mac OS X. ruby-bindings depends on lib/libnotmuch.so but it should be lib/libnotmuch.dylib on OS X. That makes `make' and `make install' fail. Even after I update the dependency to lib/libnotmuch.dylib, building ruby-bindings fails because I don't have the ruby development tools installed on my machine. I with configure has an option to skip the ruby-bindings build. `configure' seems to try to detect whether the ruby development tools are installed. It thinks I have them but I don't actually, and that's why my build fails. When I manually set 'HAVE_RUBY_DEV = 0' in Makefile.config, everything's fine. ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: [patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
Jinwoo Lee jinwo...@gmail.com writes: I with configure has an option to skip the ruby-bindings build. `configure' seems to try to detect whether the ruby development tools are installed. It thinks I have them but I don't actually, and that's why my build fails. When I manually set 'HAVE_RUBY_DEV = 0' in Makefile.config, everything's fine. Thanks for narrowing this down. Can you tell us the output of % ruby -e require 'mkmf' ; echo $? ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: search query replytoid:blah
Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com writes: Dear all, Is it possible to search based on which message ID a message *responds* to? For example, suppose message id is MESSAGEID. I want to find all emails that responded to MESSAGEID. How to enter such a query into notmuch? Threads aren't exactly the concept you ask for, because the include the messages before the message-id in question as well. Nonetheless, maybe the following helps: % notmuch show $(notmuch search --output=threads $MESAGEID) or % notmuch search --output=messages $(notmuch search --output=threads $MESAGEID) ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: [patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:11 PM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
Jinwoo Lee jinwo...@gmail.com writes:
I with configure has an option to skip the ruby-bindings build.
`configure' seems to try to detect whether the ruby development tools
are installed. It thinks I have them but I don't actually, and that's
why my build fails. When I manually set 'HAVE_RUBY_DEV = 0' in
Makefile.config, everything's fine.
Thanks for narrowing this down. Can you tell us the output of
% ruby -e require 'mkmf' ; echo $?
This command succeeds and returns 0.
When I change the dependency of ruby-bindings from libnotmuch.so to
libnotmuch.dylib and run `make', I get errors like below.
Looks like mkmf.rb (I have no idea what this is) is provided by OS X by
default, but actually running it fails.
...
[snip]
...
checking for notmuch_database_create in libnotmuch.so... *** extconf.rb failed
***
Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of necessary
libraries and/or headers. Check the mkmf.log file for more details. You may
need configuration options.
Provided configuration options:
--with-opt-dir
--without-opt-dir
--with-opt-include
--without-opt-include=${opt-dir}/include
--with-opt-lib
--without-opt-lib=${opt-dir}/lib
--with-make-prog
--without-make-prog
--srcdir=.
--curdir
--ruby=/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/bin/ruby
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:434:in
`try_do': The compiler failed to generate an executable file. (RuntimeError)
You have to install development tools first.
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:513:in
`block in try_link0'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/tmpdir.rb:88:in
`mktmpdir'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:510:in
`try_link0'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:534:in
`try_link'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:720:in
`try_func'
from extconf.rb:19:in `block in have_local_library'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:895:in
`block in checking_for'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:340:in
`block (2 levels) in postpone'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:310:in
`open'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:340:in
`block in postpone'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:310:in
`open'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:336:in
`postpone'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/mkmf.rb:894:in
`checking_for'
from extconf.rb:17:in `have_local_library'
from extconf.rb:25:in `main'
make: *** [ruby-bindings] Error 1
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: Understanding the replied tag
Hi, On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:44:46PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote: Thank you. The problem in the end is that I would like 'notmuch new' to not only schronize the 'reply' tag but to master handle the reply tag because notmuch knows which messages have been replied to (because it is aware of threads). Sorry, I have no idea what you are saying. It would help a lot if you explicitly state what you tried, what you expected, and what you saw. For example, you still haven't mentioned that you are using mutt-kz as your MUA. I know that because we had an earlier discussion on mutt-users. It is very hard to suggest something without knowing precisely what you tried. Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: search query replytoid:blah
Hi, On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:47:00PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote: Is it possible to search based on which message ID a message *responds* to? For example, suppose message id is MESSAGEID. I want to find all emails that responded to MESSAGEID. How to enter such a query into notmuch? AFAIK, this is not possible. Notmuch does not allow searching special headers. You could probably write a script using the threads output format to get the thread, and then use formail to find the responses. I however think you are probably approaching the problem incorrectly, but that's just a guess. More information about what is your goal and why, would help. Maybe there is another way to achieve what you want to achieve. Hope this helps, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: [patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
That error is from 'cd bindings/ruby ruby extconf.rb --vendor' BTW. ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: [patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:24 PM, Jinwoo Lee jinwo...@gmail.com wrote:
That error is from 'cd bindings/ruby ruby extconf.rb --vendor' BTW.
The contents of mkmf.log are below. It shows a warning about
-L/usr/local/lib and I don't have the directory /usr/local/lib on my
machine. I'm not sure if that's the cause of the error though. I don't
write Ruby and know nothing about it.
xcrun clang -o conftest -I../../lib
-I/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/include/ruby-2.0.0/universal-darwin14
-I/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/include/ruby-2.0.0/ruby/backward
-I/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/include/ruby-2.0.0
-I. -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_DARWIN_C_SOURCE -D_DARWIN_UNLIMITED_SELECT -D_REENTRANT
-g -Os -pipe -DHAVE_GCC_SYNC_BUILTINS conftest.c -L.
-L/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib -L.
-L/usr/local/lib -Wl,--no-undefined -arch x86_64 -arch i386 -lruby.2.0.0
-lpthread -ldl -lobjc
ld: warning: directory not found for option '-L/usr/local/lib'
ld: unknown option: --no-undefined
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
checked program was:
/* begin */
1: #include ruby.h
2:
3: int main(int argc, char **argv)
4: {
5: return 0;
6: }
/* end */
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
