In most part, our .rst documents are indented with 8 spaces instead
of tabs. Bring the rest of the lines to the same format.
Also, on one (supposedly empty) line, trailing spaces were removed.
---
This set is something that does not collide with anything that is
currently in the review queue -- an
On Sat, Nov 26 2016, Jani Nikula wrote:
> There is really no need to have a separate install target for the
> desktop file. Just install the desktop file with emacs, with a
> configure option to opt out.
>
> ---
>
> v3: check for desktop-file-install in configure.
This and the next change LGTM.
On Sat, Nov 26 2016, David Bremner wrote:
> Tomi Ollila writes:
>
>>
>> (you could amend copying Makefile.global for out of tree builds -- or use
>> include $(srcdir)/Makefile.global)
>>
>
> OK, I did that, and pushed to master and release. BTW, the next line
> still looks problematic for oot bu
Jani Nikula writes:
> The notmuch.desktop file is part of notmuch-emacs. Move it under
> emacs, and rename as notmuch-emacs-mua.desktop to reflect this.
Pushed patches 2-6 to master
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmai
Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> (you could amend copying Makefile.global for out of tree builds -- or use
> include $(srcdir)/Makefile.global)
>
OK, I did that, and pushed to master and release. BTW, the next line
still looks problematic for oot builds? Did not test...
d
___
This makes the option to choose Notmuch as mailto: handler show up in
the desktop environment settings. Ignore errors.
---
v3: ignore errors on update-desktop-database. I don't want to skip
desktop-file-install if update-desktop-database is not available, and
if update fails, it's likely a transi
There is really no need to have a separate install target for the
desktop file. Just install the desktop file with emacs, with a
configure option to opt out.
---
v3: check for desktop-file-install in configure.
I don't see a reason to differentiate between "with desktop" and "have
desktop-file-i
Add a file for scandir to find, but use gdb to remove it before it
gets indexed.
---
The ugly part is that this should require gdb as external dep... but
we shouldn't skip all of T050-new.sh if gdb isn't there. I'm in a
hurry, any good ideas?
---
test/T050-new.sh | 30 +++
On Sat, 26 Nov 2016, David Bremner wrote:
> It seems important to give the numeric return code for people writing
> scripts. Hopefully deviations from this convention are rare.
*blush*
As a token of my gratitude, a test for the change follows. I'm not sure
if it's quite ready for merging, but th
