Re: [PATCH 13/18] cli/new, insert, reindex: change index.try_decrypt to "auto" by default

Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > The new "auto" decryption policy is not only good for "notmuch show" > and "notmuch reindex". It's also useful for indexing messages -- > there's no good reason to not try to go ahead and index the cleartext > of a message that we have a

Re: [PATCH 16/18] crypto: add --try-decrypt=nostash to avoid stashing session keys

Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > +DO NOT USE ``index.try_decrypt=true`` or ``index-only`` > +without considering the security of your index. is index-only a typo there? As a future improvement it would be nice to reduce some of the documentation cut and

Re: bounce/forward not working due to CR at line end

On Wed, Nov 15 2017, David Bremner wrote: > Kai Harries writes: > >> David Bremner writes: >> >>> During off-list discussion, Kai mentioned id:87a7zsm5ol@gmail.com as >>> a message that he cannot bounce (and also not forward?). For me this >>>

Re: [PATCH 15/18] crypto: actually stash session keys when try-decrypt=true

Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > +Be aware that the index is likely sufficient to reconstruct > +the cleartext of the message itself, so please ensure that the > +notmuch message index is adequately protected. DO NOT USE > +

Re: bounce/forward not working due to CR at line end

David Bremner writes: > Kai Harries writes: > >> David Bremner writes: >> >>> During off-list discussion, Kai mentioned id:87a7zsm5ol@gmail.com as >>> a message that he cannot bounce (and also not forward?). For me this >>>

Re: Stashed session keys

Hi meskio-- On Wed 2017-11-15 23:41:28 +0100, meskio wrote: > Nice feature. I'm using it and it works fine. I notice some speed up, > improving > the painfulness of reading long encrypted threads in alot. And I like to > don't > be able to have around my old private keys. cool, i'm glad it's

Re: bounce/forward not working due to CR at line end

Kai Harries writes: > David Bremner writes: > >> Kai Harries writes: >> >>> David Bremner writes: >>> During off-list discussion, Kai mentioned id:87a7zsm5ol@gmail.com as a message that he cannot