notmuch show get newest message first

2019-10-08 Thread meOme
Hi!
Is it possible to get the newest message first in a result of notmuch show?
The result always shows a reply to a message after the message. But as the
reply is newer than the original message the sorting within the replies is
oldest first. It would be great to have "newest-first".
Is that possible?
Thanks a lot for not much.



--
Sent from: http://notmuch.198994.n3.nabble.com/
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


Re: notmuch show get newest message first

2019-10-08 Thread Dan Čermák
Hi,

maybe this?

(setq notmuch-search-oldest-first nil)


Cheers,

Dan

meOme  writes:

> Hi!
> Is it possible to get the newest message first in a result of notmuch show?
> The result always shows a reply to a message after the message. But as the
> reply is newer than the original message the sorting within the replies is
> oldest first. It would be great to have "newest-first".
> Is that possible?
> Thanks a lot for not much.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://notmuch.198994.n3.nabble.com/
> ___
> notmuch mailing list
> notmuch@notmuchmail.org
> https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


Re: notmuch show get newest message first

2019-10-08 Thread David Bremner
meOme  writes:

> Hi!
> Is it possible to get the newest message first in a result of notmuch show?
> The result always shows a reply to a message after the message. But as the
> reply is newer than the original message the sorting within the replies is
> oldest first. It would be great to have "newest-first".
> Is that possible?
> Thanks a lot for not much.
>

If you refer notmuch-show mode in the emacs interface, the order is
defined by a topological sort of the tree of replies.  It's currently
not possible to reverse it; I guess it's possible in principle, but
notice the last displayed message is not neccesarily the last bye date.
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


Python3 cffi bindings

2019-10-08 Thread Floris Bruynooghe
Hi all,

IIRC there was a thread in August about another attempt at bringing
the CFFI-based bindings on board as a Python3-only version.  I
believe there was a desire to re-name things but my searching-fu is
failing me and I can no longer find the email thread.

Anyway, I found the code, checked things work, updated tests on new
python versions, added a very basic intergration with the test
framework and squashed the commits.  Otherwise the attached patch
is just a plain dump of the current state so interested people have
at least a copy of the code again which can be made to work.

IIRC this probably wants to be renamed to "notmuch2" instead of
"notdb".  Otherwise I'm pretty sure this doesn't cover all the
current features either.

So maybe this can be used as a start to figure out how to merge
this if there's still an interest in this.

Cheers,
Floris


___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


Re: Python3 cffi bindings

2019-10-08 Thread David Bremner
Floris Bruynooghe  writes:
> Anyway, I found the code, checked things work, updated tests on new
> python versions, added a very basic intergration with the test
> framework and squashed the commits.  Otherwise the attached patch
> is just a plain dump of the current state so interested people have
> at least a copy of the code again which can be made to work.

I think you missed the attachement. Other than that, sounds interesting ;).

___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch