Re: test failures on 32 bit architectures.

David Bremner writes: > I know, I know, I don't use 32 bit architectures either. However... > > Looking at [1], it looks like there two tests consistently failing on 32 > bit architectures (and also mips64el, FWIW). Hmm. Somewhere between when I sent this message and now, some upgrade in debian

Re: [PATCH] python-cffi: read version from notmuch version file

On Fri 19 Jun 2020 at 15:26 +0300, Frank LENORMAND wrote: > On Fri Jun 19 12:46:28 2020, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: >> This keeps it in sync with the main notmuch version which is less >> confusing to users. >> --- >> bindings/python-cffi/setup.py | 10 +- >> 1 file changed, 9

Re: python/notmuch2 on PyPI

On Fri 19 Jun 2020 at 09:30 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Patrick Totzke writes: >> Just to clarify: alot does not, and will not, depend on packages being on >> PyPI Ah, my bad. I got some github threads mixed up and assumed this had to do with alot. > Notmuch as a project does not currently

Re: [PATCH] completion: remove "setup" from the list of possible completions

It was <2020-06-20 sob 12:53>, when Reto wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:40:49PM +0200, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: >> Having "setup" in the set requires entering three instad of two characters >> for "search". Since "setup" is rearly used it makes little sense to have >> it in the set and cripple

test failures on 32 bit architectures.

I know, I know, I don't use 32 bit architectures either. However... Looking at [1], it looks like there two tests consistently failing on 32 bit architectures (and also mips64el, FWIW). T160-json: Testing --format=json output FAIL Search message: json, 64-bit timestamp