[notmuch] [PATCH] Goto-Address mode hides the body toggle button on messages of zero depth.

2009-12-30 Thread Pablo Oliveira
Hello all, I heard about notmuch some weeks ago and I'm already liking it a lot. At first I was a little disapointed by the slow tagging, but that was fixed by Kan-Ru's great patch for Xapian. I have started using it daily, so many thanks for this mail reader ! On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:25:40

[notmuch] [PATCH] Goto-Address mode hides the body toggle button on messages of zero depth.

2009-12-30 Thread Pablo Oliveira
In this patch we increment depth by one for all messages, so that the first character of the header is always a space. Without this patch, the first character may be part of the sender email address, which is buttonized by Goto-Address minor mode, therefore hiding the

[notmuch] SWIG (and particularly Python) bindings

2009-12-30 Thread Adrian Perez de Castro
a - Free Software Engineering -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: notmuch-python-wip.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 16874 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091230/c367e416/attachment-0001.b

[notmuch] SWIG (and particularly Python) bindings

2009-12-30 Thread Ben Gamari
Excerpts from Adrian Perez de Castro's message of Wed Dec 30 05:52:23 -0500 2009: > On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:16:43 -0500, Ben wrote: > > > Regardless, I thought it might be nice to have access to the notmuch > > backend from a language other than C (preferably my high-level language > > of choice,

[notmuch] SWIG (and particularly Python) bindings

2009-12-30 Thread Scott Robinson
Excerpts from Adrian Perez de Castro's message of Wed Dec 30 02:52:23 -0800 2009: > BTW, I think that if more bindings start to appear, Notmuch might be built > as a shared library, to avoid duplicating it everywhere. One option may be > using *just* libtool but not the rest of auto-foo tools

Re: [notmuch] SWIG (and particularly Python) bindings

2009-12-30 Thread Adrian Perez de Castro
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:16:43 -0500, Ben wrote: Regardless, I thought it might be nice to have access to the notmuch backend from a language other than C (preferably my high-level language of choice, python) [...] Funny, I was just doing the same: a Python binding. Haha, so now we have two

Re: [notmuch] SWIG (and particularly Python) bindings

2009-12-30 Thread Scott Robinson
Excerpts from Adrian Perez de Castro's message of Wed Dec 30 02:52:23 -0800 2009: BTW, I think that if more bindings start to appear, Notmuch might be built as a shared library, to avoid duplicating it everywhere. One option may be using *just* libtool but not the rest of auto-foo tools (for

[notmuch] [PATCH] Goto-Address mode hides the body toggle button on messages of zero depth.

2009-12-30 Thread Pablo Oliveira
In this patch we increment depth by one for all messages, so that the first character of the header is always a space. Without this patch, the first character may be part of the sender email address, which is buttonized by Goto-Address minor mode, therefore hiding the

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Goto-Address mode hides the body toggle button on messages of zero depth.

2009-12-30 Thread Pablo Oliveira
Hello all, I heard about notmuch some weeks ago and I'm already liking it a lot. At first I was a little disapointed by the slow tagging, but that was fixed by Kan-Ru's great patch for Xapian. I have started using it daily, so many thanks for this mail reader ! On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:25:40

Re: [notmuch] SWIG (and particularly Python) bindings

2009-12-30 Thread Ben Gamari
Excerpts from Adrian Perez de Castro's message of Wed Dec 30 05:52:23 -0500 2009: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:16:43 -0500, Ben wrote: Regardless, I thought it might be nice to have access to the notmuch backend from a language other than C (preferably my high-level language of choice, python)