Hi,
before going into details, I'd like to tell you how much I like the
notmuch workflow, thank you for producing this nice piece of software !
Like most potential users, I can not really fully jump into notmuch
because of the current synchronisation issues with others MUA. One may
or may not
is designed to do, and it actually works really well.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100127/fcded64c/attachment.pgp>
Excerpts from micah anderson's message of Tue Jan 26 17:24:15 -0500 2010:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:46:43 -0800, sebastian at sspaeth.de wrote:
> > > I think it would make sense to move the mainline to git.debian.org
> > > for now, or another place where everyone can easily get an account.
> > > As
Hi all,
I don't want to throw a spanner in the works, but I am intending to use
notmuch for indexing in a scenario where the email doesn't hit the disk
- the notmuch model seems to rely pretty heavily on directories and
files but I'm working with email being delivered to a script for
up, patch queue trackers or patchwork to have
anything to say about those.
micah
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100127/297ea735/attachment.pgp>
Hello,
I have tried to add some mails to the index with "notmuch new" but it
gives me:
Internal error: Message with document ID of 62004 has no thread ID.
(lib/message.cc:353).
Is it possible to get the filename for the document 62004? Is there any
way to exclude some files from indexing? I
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:55:00 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> Very cool. Oh, if you've got commits that don't compile on their own,
> you should squash them together (or fix it in some other way). Makes
> bisecting easier in the future.
Makes sense. I am still quite new to git, so excuse those
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:49:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> While notmuchsync fullfils my needs, it is a kludge. It needs to call
> "notmuch" for each mail where a MailDir flag has changed (which can be
> quite often on an initial run, where most mails are likely to be read),
> this can take
much helper
scripts, hopefully including notmuchsync.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:49:00 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
While notmuchsync fullfils my needs, it is a kludge. It needs to call
notmuch for each mail where a MailDir flag has changed (which can be
quite often on an initial run, where most mails are likely to be read),
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:55:00 -0800, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Very cool. Oh, if you've got commits that don't compile on their own,
you should squash them together (or fix it in some other way). Makes
bisecting easier in the future.
Makes sense. I am still quite new to git, so
Hello,
I have tried to add some mails to the index with notmuch new but it
gives me:
Internal error: Message with document ID of 62004 has no thread ID.
(lib/message.cc:353).
Is it possible to get the filename for the document 62004? Is there any
way to exclude some files from indexing? I
Hi all,
I don't want to throw a spanner in the works, but I am intending to use
notmuch for indexing in a scenario where the email doesn't hit the disk
- the notmuch model seems to rely pretty heavily on directories and
files but I'm working with email being delivered to a script for
Hi Andreas,
I'm just writing because of the patch you sent to the notmuch list on
December 15th. It seems like many people are wanting this functionality,
I know I am myself and Carl has also indicated the same. However, there
were a couple of minor suggestions for improvements for your patch
Excerpts from micah anderson's message of Tue Jan 26 17:24:15 -0500 2010:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:46:43 -0800, sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote:
I think it would make sense to move the mainline to git.debian.org
for now, or another place where everyone can easily get an account.
As alternatives
also sprach micah anderson mi...@riseup.net [2010.01.27.1124 +1300]:
Couldn't all of this be done without moving the existing git
repository (don't forget that transition is a cost)? Those who
wish to put together these proposed branches go ahead and do so,
publishing those wherever they like
I've backported the term update optimisation patches
http://trac.xapian.org/ticket/250 to Xapian's 1.0 branch, and you can
find snapshot tarballs including these changes here:
http://oligarchy.co.uk/xapian/branches/1.0/
Xapian's testsuite passes (including the additional test coverage which I
also sprach Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [2010.01.26.1046
+1300]:
For example, I might have:
~/.notmuch-config:
[database]
path=/home/pioto/mail
...
[tags]
pi...@pioto.org/INBOX.ListMail.notmuch = notmuch
So, a 'tags' section, where each
also sprach Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [2010.01.27.0603
+1300]:
This is getting involved.
Maybe I'm missing something in this thread; but, why couldn't these complex
and
context-sensitive decisions be delegated to sub-processes? ala git hooks?
I think this idea is
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:12:52 +1300, martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net wrote:
also sprach Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [2010.01.27.0603
+1300]:
This is getting involved.
Maybe I'm missing something in this thread; but, why couldn't these
complex and
also sprach James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net [2010.01.28.1828 +1300]:
Are you trying to use thread: such that it could be passed to
notmuch show to see the conversation?
That's not going to work so well if so.
Why not? Works fine for me with the vim plugin...
--
martin |
As instructed by Micah below, I'm hereby letting the list know I'm no
longer interesting in shepherding that patch.
Best,
Andreas
-- Forwarded Message --
Betreff: Re: [notmuch] [patch] store folder information
Datum: Mittwoch 27 Januar 2010
Von: micah anderson mi...@riseup.net
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:34:21 +1300, martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net wrote:
also sprach James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net [2010.01.28.1828 +1300]:
Are you trying to use thread: such that it could be passed to
notmuch show to see the conversation?
That's not going to work so well
* martin f krafft (madd...@madduck.net) wrote:
also sprach micah anderson mi...@riseup.net [2010.01.27.1124 +1300]:
Personally, I've found mailing lists that have patches sent to
them tends to totally kill the list for anything else. It seems
a bit weird to use Debian's bug tracker for a
24 matches
Mail list logo