[notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

Hi, On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Carl Worth wrote: > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:39:04 +0100 (CET), Johannes Schindelin > wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Michal Sojka wrote: > > > > > as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3 > > > project. Do you mind if I use your work in

[notmuch] vim client

cer lo que deseas es desear lo que haces. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100219

[notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

Michal Sojka schrieb: > as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3 > project. Do you mind if I use your work in that file under GPLv3? I do not mind. Go ahead. -- Hannes

[notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:39:04AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Michal Sojka wrote: > > > as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3 > > project. Do you mind if I use your work in that file under GPLv3? > > I do not mind, but I

[notmuch] vim client

Hi all thank you for notmuch, it is a great project. I have been watching progress for a while but then I could no longer restrain myself and started using notmuch's vim client even though it is still a bit rough around the edges. Unfortunately there are some quirks that prevent me from

[notmuch] [PATCH] Look for text/html content types ignoring case

On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:32:42 +, David Edmondson wrote: > How about this: Looks reasonable to me, thanks. James

[notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git)

e Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100219/c09d3f0e/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] Git ancestry and sync problems (was: Mail in git)

//martin-krafft.net/gpg/) URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100219/23638609/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

Hi, On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Michal Sojka wrote: > as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3 > project. Do you mind if I use your work in that file under GPLv3? I do not mind, but I would like to ask that you contribute the improvements back under GPLv2. Thanks,

[notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

), I'll be sure to pass on to the git community. Thanks again, -Carl -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100219/6efbe82a/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git)

On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:31:15 +1300, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Ben Gamari [2010.02.18.1810 +1300]: > > > Instead of nested subtrees, think of 16 subtrees forming > > > a level-1 hash table, or 256 for level-2, which really *ought* > > > to be enough. > > > > > > Anyway, rewriting a

[notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

Heya, On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 09:19, Michal Sojka wrote: > as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3 > project. Do you mind if I use your work in that file under GPLv3? I don't mind, go right ahead :). -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier

[notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git)

Excerpts from Michal Sojka's message of Fri Feb 19 04:52:18 -0500 2010: > Why do you want to store tag-to-message mapping in git? This is IMHO > perfectly solved by Xapian so storing message-to-tag mapping would be > sufficient, wouldn't it? > In my case, I would like to keep the entire state of

[notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

Dear Pierre, Johannes (2x) and Sverre, as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3 project. Do you mind if I use your work in that file under GPLv3? Thanks Michal On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:39:28 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote: > Dear Junio, > > I like the simple and powerful

[notmuch] [PATCH] Look for text/html content types ignoring case

-types.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 918 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100219/1f5e3341/attachment.patch> -- next part -- dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org

Re: [notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

Dear Pierre, Johannes (2x) and Sverre, as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3 project. Do you mind if I use your work in that file under GPLv3? Thanks Michal On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:39:28 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: Dear Junio, I like the

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Look for text/html content types ignoring case

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:29:15 +, James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net wrote: On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:11:24 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote: On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:51:00 +, James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net wrote: Some people send html parts as text/HTML or similar,

Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git)

On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:31:15 +1300, martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net wrote: also sprach Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com [2010.02.18.1810 +1300]: Instead of nested subtrees, think of 16 subtrees forming a level-1 hash table, or 256 for level-2, which really *ought* to be enough.

Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git)

Excerpts from Michal Sojka's message of Fri Feb 19 04:52:18 -0500 2010: Why do you want to store tag-to-message mapping in git? This is IMHO perfectly solved by Xapian so storing message-to-tag mapping would be sufficient, wouldn't it? In my case, I would like to keep the entire state of my

Re: [notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

Heya, On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 09:19, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3 project. Do you mind if I use your work in that file under GPLv3? I don't mind, go right ahead :). -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier

Re: [notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

Hi, On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Michal Sojka wrote: as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3 project. Do you mind if I use your work in that file under GPLv3? I do not mind, but I would like to ask that you contribute the improvements back under GPLv2. Thanks, Johannes

[notmuch] vim client

Hi all thank you for notmuch, it is a great project. I have been watching progress for a while but then I could no longer restrain myself and started using notmuch's vim client even though it is still a bit rough around the edges. Unfortunately there are some quirks that prevent me from

Re: [notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:39:04AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: Hi, On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Michal Sojka wrote: as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3 project. Do you mind if I use your work in that file under GPLv3? I do not mind, but I would like to

Re: [notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

Michal Sojka schrieb: as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3 project. Do you mind if I use your work in that file under GPLv3? I do not mind. Go ahead. -- Hannes ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Re: [notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:39:04 +0100 (CET), Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote: On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Michal Sojka wrote: as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3 project. Do you mind if I use your work in that file under GPLv3? I do not mind,

Re: [notmuch] vim client

On 17:49, Fri 19 Feb 10, Arian Kuschki wrote: 1. will there be a usable ncurses or mutt version that supports notmuch anytime soon? I started to work on that I while ago. I didn't hack on it for a while, but I hope I'll return to it soon. Anyway to create a proper good client is a lot of

Re: [notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

Hi, On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Carl Worth wrote: On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:39:04 +0100 (CET), Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote: On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Michal Sojka wrote: as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3 project. Do you mind if I use

Re: [notmuch] Quick thoughts on a notmuch daemon

I started to code something base on your idea of a notmuch daemon. You can find it on: git://gitorious.org/notsomuch/notmuch.git On the server branch. The idea is to use unix named sockets to intercomunicate between the daemon and the client. And threads on the server to handle every request.