Carl Worth writes:
> From 8693995fde71e8b028318e1e83bdbb6ae759335a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Carl Worth
> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:41:24 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from
> GPLv2 to GPLv2+.
Please drop the above the next time.
> The
The above patch and script don't deal with attachments or inline html,
both of which require (for now) that the mail file be present
locally. That may not be necessary with planned changed to notmuch in
the future.
For the time being, though, you can get attachments and html to work
with over
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:05:35 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> Hey, Carl. I've noticed that you've been applying some patches that
> were recently sent to the list, out of order from the chronological
> queue of patches that were sent to the list. I'm a fan of the recently
> applied patches, but
Typically, the filenames in a mail directory that actually
contain mail obey some specific format. For example, in my
MH email directory, all mail filenames consist only of
digits.
This patch adds support for a config file variable
"filename_pattern" which maybe set to a regex used to filter
cation/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100222/63eb9098/attachment.pgp>
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:05:35 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> I'm not at all trying to be pushy; there's just some older stuff in the
> queue that I would really like to see applied, such as folder-based
> tagging
Hi,
as for the folder-based tagging patch sent by myself, it needs some
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:05:35 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
I'm not at all trying to be pushy; there's just some older stuff in the
queue that I would really like to see applied, such as folder-based
tagging
Hi,
as for the folder-based tagging patch sent by myself,
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:05:35 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Hey, Carl. I've noticed that you've been applying some patches that
were recently sent to the list, out of order from the chronological
queue of patches that were sent to the list. I'm a fan of the recently
From 8693995fde71e8b028318e1e83bdbb6ae759335a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:41:24 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from
GPLv2 to GPLv2+.
This file has had no explicit license information noted in
Typically, the filenames in a mail directory that actually
contain mail obey some specific format. For example, in my
MH email directory, all mail filenames consist only of
digits.
This patch adds support for a config file variable
filename_pattern which maybe set to a regex used to filter
only
The above patch and script don't deal with attachments or inline html,
both of which require (for now) that the mail file be present
locally. That may not be necessary with planned changed to notmuch in
the future.
For the time being, though, you can get attachments and html to work
with over
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
FWIW, I only said _at least_ you need consent from them, and it was not
meant to be an exhaustive list. blame -C -C -C may tell you more.
Without substantial analysis, blame alone is not sufficient - it
does not
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:07:31PM -0800, Bart Massey wrote:
Typically, the filenames in a mail directory that actually
contain mail obey some specific format. For example, in my
MH email directory, all mail filenames consist only of
digits.
This patch adds support for a config file
14 matches
Mail list logo
