[notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:55:19 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:53:29 -0500, James Vasile > wrote: > > Maybe this retry loop should be put in notmuch itself? > > Perhaps it should. I've even imagined something that would queue a > request into a daemon if the database isn't

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:33:08 -0500, micah anderson wrote: > > Hey james, > > i really like your notmuch-retry bits, I've taken that shell script and > integrated it into my tagging script, thanks! I'm curious if you are > going to update your patch for notmuch.el ("Calls to notmuch get queued >

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:14:45 -0500, micah anderson wrote: > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:25:16 -0500, James Vasile > wrote: > This stuff should go up on the wiki! There is a "Tips and Tricks for > using notmuch with Emacs" section, but more general things like James' > script and other people's

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread micah anderson
g it one way, over the other. micah -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100226/46369fa3/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] [PATCH v2 3/4] Configure the database separately from mail store

2010-02-26 Thread David Benjamin
Signed-off-by: David Benjamin --- Apparently I never ran the last-minute tweak I did to notmuch_config_set_database_path. Oops. Oh well, here's the trivially fixed version. notmuch-client.h |7 ++ notmuch-config.c | 62 --

[notmuch] Thoughts on not seeing messages I can't deal with (yet, or now, or here...)

2010-02-26 Thread Mark Anderson
Carl, There's a post from a while ago about using GTD on Remember The Milk. Remember the Milk as described here is mainly a todo manager, but the saved search (as a list of todo tasks that match the criterion) is what's being utilized here that makes me think so much of notmuch. This seems to

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread martin f krafft
ature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100226/84366df4/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] [PATCH] Simplify "unread" tag handling in emacs UI.

2010-02-26 Thread Carl Worth
: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100226/786899a2/attachment-0001.pgp>

[notmuch] [PATCH 2/2] document new `notmuch new` behavior

2010-02-26 Thread Mike Kelly
--- notmuch.1 |8 +--- notmuch.c |3 ++- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/notmuch.1 b/notmuch.1 index 282ad98..f03529e 100644 --- a/notmuch.1 +++ b/notmuch.1 @@ -93,9 +93,11 @@ The .B new command scans all sub-directories of the database, performing

[notmuch] [PATCH 1/2] Initial support for maildir flags.

2010-02-26 Thread Mike Kelly
When adding new messages, if they have the 'S' (seen) flag, do not add them to the 'unread' tag. --- lib/message.cc | 25 + lib/notmuch.h |5 + notmuch-new.c |3 ++- 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/message.cc

[notmuch] [PATCH] A simple approach to maildir flags

2010-02-26 Thread Mike Kelly
The following patches attempt to provide a simple, extendable approach to handling the 'Seen' maildir flag. To appease (hopefully) everyone, it will only do this for new messages. This means that people coming from another MUA won't be stuck with 30,000 unread messages, for example. It should be

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread micah anderson
pgp bits ;) -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100226/26c6d986/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] What's so great about notmuch?

2010-02-26 Thread Carl Worth
; (once we can figure out what that is). -Carl -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100226/e38f9c46/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] Thoughts on not seeing messages I can't deal with (yet, or now, or here...)

2010-02-26 Thread Carl Worth
L rendering, missing FCC support, etc. etc. etc.). -Carl -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100226/f2bdbc0d/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread Carl Worth
ure Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100226/3c9c0e25/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] A few patches

2010-02-26 Thread Carl Worth
? Thanks, -Carl -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100226/221b7005/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread Jameson Rollins
it as a folder. jamie. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100226/1c1238ac/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch.el: add a hook to notmuch-reply

2010-02-26 Thread da...@tethera.net
From: David Bremner This patch introduces a variable notmuch-reply-hook and calls it using run-hooks. This allows people to easily override the header setup and so forth done by notmuch. --- This is my solution to trying to rationalize the headers of 'm' versus 'r'; now I just

[notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
It occurs to me that having generic ability to tell notmuch to retry until the DB isn't locked might useful. So I put the functionality in a script that can sit between notmuch and various clients. It will simplify my emacs setup, and improve it since emacs's handling of asynchronous processes

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread Carl Worth
e Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100226/d2befd97/attachment.pgp>

Re: [notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread Carl Worth
Sometimes I manually override a rule-based tag. If automatic tagging operated on old messages, overrides could be superseded. When I add automatic tag rules, I first execute them manually and globally from the command line. Right. With my global automatic tags, I don't want to be able to

[notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch.el: add a hook to notmuch-reply

2010-02-26 Thread david
From: David Bremner brem...@unb.ca This patch introduces a variable notmuch-reply-hook and calls it using run-hooks. This allows people to easily override the header setup and so forth done by notmuch. --- This is my solution to trying to rationalize the headers of 'm' versus 'r'; now I just

[notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
It occurs to me that having generic ability to tell notmuch to retry until the DB isn't locked might useful. So I put the functionality in a script that can sit between notmuch and various clients. It will simplify my emacs setup, and improve it since emacs's handling of asynchronous processes

Re: [notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [2010.02.26.1600 +0100]: Me too! :-) Isn't that what folders are? At least that's what they seem to me. I define a specific search, give it a name, and save it as a folder. There's a 1:∞ relationship between folders and messages. I

Re: [notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread micah anderson
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:25:16 -0500, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: I'm curious as to what people are doing in this regard. I am pretty good at evangelizing notmuch and converted another person[0]... in doing so I realized I had to walk through a few issues to get them started.

Re: [notmuch] A few patches

2010-02-26 Thread Carl Worth
Hi Mike, welcome to notmuch! On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:42:00 -0500 (EST), Mike Kelly pi...@pioto.org wrote: I've got a few patches available in my notmuch repo: http://git.pioto.org/gitweb/notmuch.git Thanks for sharing these! I really like how the distributed nature of git makes it so easy

[notmuch] [PATCH] A simple approach to maildir flags

2010-02-26 Thread Mike Kelly
The following patches attempt to provide a simple, extendable approach to handling the 'Seen' maildir flag. To appease (hopefully) everyone, it will only do this for new messages. This means that people coming from another MUA won't be stuck with 30,000 unread messages, for example. It should be

[notmuch] [PATCH 1/2] Initial support for maildir flags.

2010-02-26 Thread Mike Kelly
When adding new messages, if they have the 'S' (seen) flag, do not add them to the 'unread' tag. --- lib/message.cc | 25 + lib/notmuch.h |5 + notmuch-new.c |3 ++- 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/message.cc

[notmuch] [PATCH 2/2] document new `notmuch new` behavior

2010-02-26 Thread Mike Kelly
--- notmuch.1 |8 +--- notmuch.c |3 ++- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/notmuch.1 b/notmuch.1 index 282ad98..f03529e 100644 --- a/notmuch.1 +++ b/notmuch.1 @@ -93,9 +93,11 @@ The .B new command scans all sub-directories of the database, performing

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread Carl Worth
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:53:29 -0500, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: Maybe this retry loop should be put in notmuch itself? Perhaps it should. I've even imagined something that would queue a request into a daemon if the database isn't currently available. But of course there are

[notmuch] Thoughts on not seeing messages I can't deal with (yet, or now, or here...)

2010-02-26 Thread Carl Worth
[This mail started as some off-topic rambling in my reply to the notmuch-reply script. So that's why it starts on one topic and ends somewhere else entirely.] I'm currently avoiding any locking failures with notmuch commands by running notmuch new manually, (rather than from a cron job). And it

[notmuch] What's so great about notmuch?

2010-02-26 Thread Carl Worth
It seems clear that I'll have some opportunities to present notmuch to various audiences at varying levels of formality. Since notmuch is already a bigger project than me, I'd love to get some ideas from others about what you think are the big ideas in notmuch. So here are a few different

[notmuch] [PATCH v2 3/4] Configure the database separately from mail store

2010-02-26 Thread David Benjamin
Signed-off-by: David Benjamin david...@mit.edu --- Apparently I never ran the last-minute tweak I did to notmuch_config_set_database_path. Oops. Oh well, here's the trivially fixed version. notmuch-client.h |7 ++ notmuch-config.c | 62

Re: [notmuch] Thoughts on not seeing messages I can't deal with (yet, or now, or here...)

2010-02-26 Thread Mark Anderson
Carl, There's a post from a while ago about using GTD on Remember The Milk. Remember the Milk as described here is mainly a todo manager, but the saved search (as a list of todo tasks that match the criterion) is what's being utilized here that makes me think so much of notmuch. This seems to

Re: [notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:33:08 -0500, micah anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote: Hey james, i really like your notmuch-retry bits, I've taken that shell script and integrated it into my tagging script, thanks! I'm curious if you are going to update your patch for notmuch.el (Calls to notmuch get

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:55:19 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:53:29 -0500, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: Maybe this retry loop should be put in notmuch itself? Perhaps it should. I've even imagined something that would queue a request into a