> ubuntu 9.10 and I don't have LDPATH set at all. Thanks, I will try to
> fix that.
Oh, nevermind what I said earlier.
Verify that /usr/local/lib is in /etc/ld.so.conf. If not add it there. Then
run ldconfig
after installing notmuch, then it should work. Doing everything with the
package
Add a new_tags option in the [messages] section of the configuration
file to allow the user to specify which tags should be added to new
messages by notmuch new.
---
notmuch-client.h |8 ++
notmuch-config.c | 63 ++
notmuch-new.c|
Hey all,
I had some time today to finally put together a patch to make the tags used by
notmuch new configurable. I added a [messages] section to the .notmuch-config
to hold this new option, although this can be easily changed. Let me know what
you think! Thanks!
- Ben
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:43:10 +, ingmar at exherbo.org wrote:
> What's the value of LDPATH in your environment? It should contain
> /usr/local/lib.
> If it doesn't that's not an issue with the patch, but with your
> installation/distro
ubuntu 9.10 and I don't have LDPATH set at all. Thanks,
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:03:34 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, I didn't make much progress in implementating this, but
> > > it's definitely a priority for me because I want to get rid of slow
> > > notmuchsync.
> >
> > notmuchsync
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:22:09 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> To me it seems the issue here is the distinction between the notmuch
> CLI, and any other reader UI that uses it. AFAICT, the CLI actually has
> no need to know what "your" email address is, so I don't see why it
> should be configured
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:41:09 -0800 (PST), Ben Gamari wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:25:45 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" SSpaeth.de> wrote:
> > I just tried out this patch to compile notmuch as a shared library and
> > while producing lib/libnotmuch.so.1 it fails to find notmuch later:
>
> Try the
put, by the way. I think
> that suppressing the output of msg bodies in notmuch show will help
> notmuchsync performance *a lot*.
I've just tried it :-(
+ /home/wsh/src/notmuchsync/notmuchsync -s -n -d
20100312 15:59:37 - DEBUG - Execute ['notmuch', 'show', '--format=json',
'1265813977..1270997977']
Tr
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:47:33 +0100, Ingmar Vanhassel
wrote:
> Here's my updated series for this.
Ben Gamaris original patch gives me an "-lnotmuch" not found failure
during compilation.
Your patchset compiles fine and installs /usr/local/bin/notmuch and
/usr/local/lib/libnotmuch.so.1. However,
> Unfortunately, I didn't make much progress in implementating this, but
> it's definitely a priority for me because I want to get rid of slow
> notmuchsync.
notmuchsync master is now using the json output, by the way. I think
that suppressing the output of msg bodies in notmuch show will help
> Ben Gamaris original patch gives me an "-lnotmuch" not found failure
> during compilation.
> Your patchset compiles fine and installs /usr/local/bin/notmuch and
> /usr/local/lib/libnotmuch.so.1. However, it doesn't find it when running
> and exits saying libnotmuch.so not found.
Right, that was
This allows packagers to specify to which directory libraries should be
installed.
Signed-off-by: Ingmar Vanhassel
---
Makefile.local |6 +++---
configure |7 +++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.local b/Makefile.local
index
From: Saleem Abdulrasool
Signed-off-by: Ingmar Vanhassel
---
lib/Makefile.local |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/Makefile.local b/lib/Makefile.local
index f848946..7105070 100644
--- a/lib/Makefile.local
+++
From: Ben Gamari
Signed-off-by: Ingmar Vanhassel
---
.gitignore |1 +
Makefile |1 +
Makefile.local | 10 +++---
lib/Makefile.local |9 +
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/.gitignore
I was just going to mail an updated series for this. I'd definitely like to see
this upstream.
I amended the first patch to install the notmuch.h header.
The second patch from a friend of mine fixes a parallel make issue I ran into
when I tested one of your intiial patches. I ran this patch by
To ease the transition to a JSON based implementation of
`notmuch-show', move the current implementation into a separate file.
Signed-off-by: David Edmondson
---
emacs/Makefile.local |2 +-
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 982 +
emacs/notmuch.el
When the emacs UI is split into multiple files they are likely to be
interdependent. Adding the emacs directory to the load-path means that
one file will be able to `require' another.
Signed-off-by: David Edmondson
---
Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff
Sorry, I just (re?)read the submission guidelines. I'll send another
version that attempts to comply.
dme.
--
David Edmondson, http://dme.org
---
Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 46f001c..f0b96e0 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ quiet ?= $($1)
$(call quiet,CC,$(CFLAGS)) -c $(FINAL_CFLAGS) $< -o $@
%.elc: %.el
- $(call
---
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100312/17577baf/attachment.pgp>
> To avoid breaking the current behavior, what if the set of tags applied to
> new/moved/deleted(?) messages could be set on the command line or some
> other library interface, while just perhaps defaulting to unread/inbox?
> This would support both the current behavior and a hooks-like
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:49:35 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:22:41 +0100, Michal Sojka
> > wrote:
> > > thanks for clarification. It all sounds reasonable. The only problem I
> > > can see now is that if I create a new account on
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, David A Benjamin wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Ben Gamari wrote:
> > While the notmuch command-line interface is fantastic, there defintely are
> > a few
> > gaps which hurt performance. Since I've been following, I've seen several
> > threads on how to handle message
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:22:41 +0100, Michal Sojka
> wrote:
> > thanks for clarification. It all sounds reasonable. The only problem I
> > can see now is that if I create a new account on my machine and run
> > emacs there, then the value of
---
Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 46f001c..f0b96e0 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ quiet ?= $($1)
$(call quiet,CC,$(CFLAGS)) -c $(FINAL_CFLAGS) $ -o $@
%.elc: %.el
- $(call
When the emacs UI is split into multiple files they are likely to be
interdependent. Adding the emacs directory to the load-path means that
one file will be able to `require' another.
Signed-off-by: David Edmondson d...@dme.org
---
Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1
I'd very much like to see this upstream.
Here's my updated series for this.
I amended your first patch to make it install the notmuch.h header too.
The second patch fixed some parallel make issue I had while testing your
series. We discussed this
ages ago on #notmuch, I don't remember the
Unfortunately, I didn't make much progress in implementating this, but
it's definitely a priority for me because I want to get rid of slow
notmuchsync.
notmuchsync master is now using the json output, by the way. I think
that suppressing the output of msg bodies in notmuch show will help
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:47:33 +0100, Ingmar Vanhassel ing...@exherbo.org wrote:
Here's my updated series for this.
Ben Gamaris original patch gives me an -lnotmuch not found failure
during compilation.
Your patchset compiles fine and installs /usr/local/bin/notmuch and
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:49:35 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
Hmm, I understand. My worry about this approach is the following: Now it
is very straightforward to start using notmuch. You only answer a few
questions when you run notmuch for the first time and then it works. If
we
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:22:09 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
To me it seems the issue here is the distinction between the notmuch
CLI, and any other reader UI that uses it. AFAICT, the CLI actually has
no need to know what your email address is, so I don't see why it
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:03:34 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Unfortunately, I didn't make much progress in implementating this, but
it's definitely a priority for me because I want to get rid of slow
notmuchsync.
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:43:10 +, ing...@exherbo.org wrote:
What's the value of LDPATH in your environment? It should contain
/usr/local/lib.
If it doesn't that's not an issue with the patch, but with your
installation/distro
ubuntu 9.10 and I don't have LDPATH set at all. Thanks, I will
ubuntu 9.10 and I don't have LDPATH set at all. Thanks, I will try to
fix that.
Oh, nevermind what I said earlier.
Verify that /usr/local/lib is in /etc/ld.so.conf. If not add it there. Then
run ldconfig
after installing notmuch, then it should work. Doing everything with the
package
34 matches
Mail list logo