Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:44:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line... Carl =?UTF-8?b?buKIhXRtdWNoIOSasw==?= Worth , that's not pretty... nor readable. /D -- Dirk Hohndel Intel Open Source Technology Center

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line... /D On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:06:09 -0700, Carl n?tmuch ? Worth wrote: > > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" > SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > > On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote: > > > Perhaps Carl should get more N?rw?g?a? friends,

RFC: User-Agent header

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:55:17 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > So I propose something like: > > User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux) +1 /D -- Dirk Hohndel Intel Open Source Technology Center

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-09 Thread Carl n∅tmuch 䚳 Worth
A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/f9fa2828/attachment.pgp>

RFC: User-Agent header

2010-04-09 Thread Carl Worth
generate that, that would be great. -Carl -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/8afe7571/attachment.pgp>

[RFC] reordering and cleanup of thread authors

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 03:53:59 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > I think that using | as a separator would help here. Let's say that > initially we have "Matched Author, Non Matched, Matched Again" we can > tranform this to "Matched Author, Matched Again| Non Matched". This way, > the length of the

[PATCH] Derive version numbers from git

2010-04-09 Thread Carl Worth
ture Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/c7d97b79/attachment-0001.pgp>

[PATCH] Have notmuch count default to showing the total.

2010-04-09 Thread Carl Worth
t available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/8a4006c2/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH] Have notmuch count default to showing the total.

2010-04-09 Thread Carl Worth
nt to be or not to be -Carl OK, we need a simpler search syntax than that... -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/34915629/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] [PATCH v2] notmuch.el: Make notmuch-show buffer name first subject, instead of thread-id

2010-04-09 Thread Carl Worth
ld apply here. -Carl -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/45d20b5e/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH] Have notmuch count default to showing the total.

2010-04-09 Thread Mike Kelly
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 05:28:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > What's wrong with having them inconsistent in this one respect? > > $ notmuch count > 96632 > $ notmuch search > Error: notmuch search requires at least one search term. > > ...seems pretty logical behaviour to me? My thoughts

[PATCH] Have notmuch count default to showing the total.

2010-04-09 Thread Jameson Rollins
c: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/7fdc2777/attachment-0001.pgp>

[PATCH] Next attempt to get guessing of From addresses correct in replies

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
We now go through the following searches in order: 0) one of the users addresses was in a To: or Cc: header 1) check for an Envelope-to: header that matches one of the addresses 2) check for an X-Original-To: header that matches one of the addresses 3) check for a (for ) clause in Received:

[PATCH] Have notmuch count default to showing the total.

2010-04-09 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-04-08, Mike Kelly wrote: > If no parameters are given to notmuch-count, or just '' or '*' are > given, return the total number of messages in the database. I know that cworth was concerned about this syntax on IRC as that would mean that "notmuch show" would have to spew out all your

Initial attempt at a "merge window" for notmuch

2010-04-09 Thread Mark Anderson
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:29:20 -0500, Carl Worth wrote: > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:23:27 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > For my merge window, I also want something that can't be obtained > > today. I want to see all threads that contain at least one message > > that matches my date range

[PATCH] Have notmuch count default to showing the total.

2010-04-09 Thread Mark Anderson
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 14:28:32 -0500, Anthony Towns wrote: > [0] Not much, afaics! [1] > [1] Man, what are the chances that will ever get old? [0] Thanks AJ, I like it! -Mark

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-09 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 00:03, Jameson Rollins wrote: > Presumably others must be annoyed about having to manually "read" and > archive all their sent mail, unless there's some other way that people > having been dealing with this that I'm not aware of. I haven't switched over to notmuch properly

[PATCH] Add 'G' keybinding to folder and search view that triggers external poll

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
The new functions first check if an external poll script has been defined in the variable 'notmuch-external-refresh-script and if yes, runs that script before executing the existing refresh function (which is bound to '=') This can be used to have 'G' mimic the mutt behavior of polling an

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-09 Thread micah anderson
ext part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/87775488/attachment.pgp>

[RFC] reordering and cleanup of thread authors

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:07:27 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > > > This is based in part on some discussion on IRC today. > > When a thread is displayed in the search results, previously the authors > > were always displayed in chronological order. But if

[PATCH] Have notmuch count default to showing the total.

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:01:35 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > On 2010-04-08, Mike Kelly wrote: > > If no parameters are given to notmuch-count, or just '' or '*' are > > given, return the total number of messages in the database. > > I know that cworth was concerned about this syntax on IRC as

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote: > > "Decode headers in reply" > > (id:1267602656-24940-1-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz) is another > > patch, which is quite essential to me. Am I the only one here, who needs > > to reply

[notmuch] [PATCH v2] notmuch.el: add functionality in notmuch search mode to add or remove tags by region

2010-04-09 Thread Jesse Rosenthal
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:10:38 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:07:40 -0500, Jesse Rosenthal > wrote: > I think this feature is very useful, and that the region is definitely > an appropriate way to implement it, (doing region-based operations is > very natural for emacs users).

[notmuch] [PATCH v2] notmuch.el: Make notmuch-show buffer name first subject, instead of thread-id

2010-04-09 Thread Jesse Rosenthal
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:46:01 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > A very lovely change, Jesse! Thanks for this (which is now pushed). And > again, thanks to Sebastian for guiding the patch through the file > renaming. Great to hear! Sorry I've been off of email, and still only have sporadic access.

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

2010-04-09 Thread Michal Sojka
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote: > > I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest > > is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz, but it > > is not rebased to the current master. > > Not sure what I

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-09 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote: > "Decode headers in reply" > (id:1267602656-24940-1-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz) is another > patch, which is quite essential to me. Am I the only one here, who needs > to reply to messages with non-ASCII characters? Nope, and it looks currently very

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

2010-04-09 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote: > I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest > is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz, but it > is not rebased to the current master. Not sure what I am doing wrong, but with this patch even after a

Initial attempt at a "merge window" for notmuch

2010-04-09 Thread Carl Worth
-- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/614ad6ad/attachment.pgp>

Initial attempt at a "merge window" for notmuch

2010-04-09 Thread Carl Worth
-- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/a636756d/attachment.pgp>

[RFC] reordering and cleanup of thread authors

2010-04-09 Thread Michal Sojka
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > This is based in part on some discussion on IRC today. > When a thread is displayed in the search results, previously the authors > were always displayed in chronological order. But if only part of the > thread matches the query, that may or may not be

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-09 Thread Michal Sojka
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Carl Worth wrote: > * Anything else that people want, (especially things that already > exist and that you're already using). Support for maildir flags on > import would be great here. I'm still waiting to see a complete > solution I think. > > So keep the

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-09 Thread Michal Sojka
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 00:03, Jameson Rollins > wrote: > > Presumably others must be annoyed about having to manually "read" and > > archive all their sent mail, unless there's some other way that people > > having been dealing with this that I'm not

Re: [RFC] reordering and cleanup of thread authors

2010-04-09 Thread Michal Sojka
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Dirk Hohndel wrote: This is based in part on some discussion on IRC today. When a thread is displayed in the search results, previously the authors were always displayed in chronological order. But if only part of the thread matches the query, that may or may not be the

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

2010-04-09 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote: I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojk...@fel.cvut.cz, but it is not rebased to the current master. Not sure what I am doing wrong, but with this patch even after a

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

2010-04-09 Thread Michal Sojka
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote: I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojk...@fel.cvut.cz, but it is not rebased to the current master. Not sure what I am doing

Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-09 Thread micah anderson
On 2010-04-08, micah anderson wrote: On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to have in place: * Changes to indexing, (addition of body:, folder:, list:, etc.). This is stuff that

Initial attempt at a merge window for notmuch

2010-04-09 Thread Carl Worth
I want to figure out how to make a release process that will work for notmuch. An idea I have now is to use a date-based merge window during which features are nominated for the release. So I took a window starting at my original request for 0.2 features until now. In our current (lame) syntax

Re: [PATCH] Have notmuch count default to showing the total.

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:01:35 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: On 2010-04-08, Mike Kelly wrote: If no parameters are given to notmuch-count, or just '' or '*' are given, return the total number of messages in the database. I know that cworth was concerned about this

Re: Initial attempt at a merge window for notmuch

2010-04-09 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 02:23, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: 3. Ability to easily post search results to a web page. Isn't that a job for noneatall [0] -- maybe it just needs the ability to export to static pages, that can be rsync'ed somewhere? [0] http://github.com/dme/noneatall 4.

Re: [PATCH] Have notmuch count default to showing the total.

2010-04-09 Thread Mark Anderson
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 14:28:32 -0500, Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au wrote: [0] Not much, afaics! [1] [1] Man, what are the chances that will ever get old? [0] Thanks AJ, I like it! -Mark ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org

[PATCH] Add 'G' keybinding to folder and search view that triggers external poll

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
The new functions first check if an external poll script has been defined in the variable 'notmuch-external-refresh-script and if yes, runs that script before executing the existing refresh function (which is bound to '=') This can be used to have 'G' mimic the mutt behavior of polling an

Re: [PATCH] Have notmuch count default to showing the total.

2010-04-09 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 05:28:32 +1000, Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au wrote: What's wrong with having them inconsistent in this one respect? [0] $ notmuch count 96632 $ notmuch search Error: notmuch search requires at least one search term. This seems very logical and intuitive behavior in

Re: [PATCH] Have notmuch count default to showing the total.

2010-04-09 Thread Mike Kelly
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 05:28:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: What's wrong with having them inconsistent in this one respect? $ notmuch count 96632 $ notmuch search Error: notmuch search requires at least one search term. ...seems pretty logical behaviour to me? My thoughts exactly :)

[PATCH] Next attempt to get guessing of From addresses correct in replies

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
We now go through the following searches in order: 0) one of the users addresses was in a To: or Cc: header 1) check for an Envelope-to: header that matches one of the addresses 2) check for an X-Original-To: header that matches one of the addresses 3) check for a (for em...@add.res) clause in

Re: [PATCH] Have notmuch count default to showing the total.

2010-04-09 Thread Carl Worth
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:19:47 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote: On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:01:35 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: 1) I often want to know how many mails are in my db. notmuch count or notmuch count * is the intuitive syntax I would use for that.

Re: [RFC] reordering and cleanup of thread authors

2010-04-09 Thread Michal Sojka
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Dirk Hohndel wrote: On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:07:27 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Dirk Hohndel wrote: This is based in part on some discussion on IRC today. When a thread is displayed in the search results, previously the authors

Re: [PATCH] Derive version numbers from git

2010-04-09 Thread Carl Worth
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:49:22 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Carl Worth wrote: I have modified the patch slightly and I think that it could solve the above points. The release process should be modified this way: you skip point 5 (increment the notmuch

Re: [RFC] reordering and cleanup of thread authors

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 03:53:59 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: I think that using | as a separator would help here. Let's say that initially we have Matched Author, Non Matched, Matched Again we can tranform this to Matched Author, Matched Again| Non Matched. This way, the length

Re: RFC: User-Agent header

2010-04-09 Thread Carl Worth
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:12:47 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote: On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:26:01 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: No patch yet, just asking if this is a good idea or not. Yes. A fine idea. I think it's a very good idea. But it should be

Re: RFC: User-Agent header

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:55:17 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: So I propose something like: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux) +1 /D -- Dirk Hohndel Intel Open Source Technology Center ___

Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line... /D On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:06:09 -0700, Carl n∅tmuch 䚳 Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote: Perhaps Carl should get more

Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-09 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:44:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote: here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line... Carl =?UTF-8?b?buKIhXRtdWNoIOSasw==?= Worth cwo...@cworth.org, that's not pretty... nor readable. /D -- Dirk Hohndel Intel Open Source Technology Center