Initial attempt at a "merge window" for notmuch

2010-04-10 Thread Michal Sojka
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Mark Anderson wrote: > On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:29:20 -0500, Carl Worth wrote: > > Of course, it's the same set-theoretic operation I described earlier. I > > want the set of threads having messages matching: > > > > tag:notmuch and > > > > intersected with the set of

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Michal Sojka
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:19 +0200, Michal Sojka > wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Carl n?tmuch ? Worth wrote: > > > Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes > > > through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the From

RFC: User-Agent header

2010-04-10 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:12:47 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:26:01 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > notmuch is (mostly) not responsible for sending email. However, people > > using the emacs frontend use notmuch to create the reply. > > > > Am I the only one

[notmuch] Bulk message tagging

2010-04-10 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:51:01 -0600, Mark Anderson wrote: > > I think that '*' is definitely an awesome command, but I wonder if we > shouldn't have another command for the notmuch-search buffer which means > 'tag all the threads that I can see in this buffer'. This is exactly what my

Initial attempt at a "merge window" for notmuch

2010-04-10 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-04-09, Carl Worth wrote: > > Here's the current list: Having such a list is great. So now we need to get you a key-binding that says, "take query xy results and stuff them into the wiki" (or some pastebin like service with a fixed URL). Looking forward to 0.2. Sebastian (THanks to the

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-04-10, Carl n?tmuch ? Worth wrote: > Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes > through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the From line being > replied to? Let's test that here... I think there are 2 issues being discussed here. One is the encoding in the

[notmuch] [PATCH v2] notmuch.el: Make notmuch-show buffer name first subject, instead of thread-id

2010-04-10 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-04-09, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: > sporadic access. However, one question: it looks like it was V2 of the > patch that you pushed -- was it? Unfortunately, there was a subtle bug > that kept on popping up (when you call notmuch-show interactively, which > rarely happens). Later in this same

[notmuch] Debian package update ?

2010-04-10 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Carl, On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:43:47 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:12:51 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > I feel like being far behind master with my current (official) > > Debian package. Is there any chance to get a more recent one soon ? > > I did update the Debian

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Michal Sojka
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Carl n?tmuch ? Worth wrote: > > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" > SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > > On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote: > > > Perhaps Carl should get more N?rw?g?a? friends, :-). > > > > Or G?rm?n or ?? > > Are you all trying to show a problem

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Jameson Rollins
ent was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100410/111461f0/attachment.pgp>

RFC: User-Agent header

2010-04-10 Thread Jameson Rollins
scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100410/ecaa859e/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH] notmuch new --new-tags=tags...

2010-04-10 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 01:03:04 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Hi *, > > The attached patch makes "notmuch new --new-tags=unread,new" set the > "unread" and "new" tags on any new mail it finds rather than "unread" > and "inbox". Or whatever other tags you happen to specify. I really like this - I

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Jameson Rollins
uld be doing the translation for you. jamie. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100410/9fdaf0d8/attachment.pgp>

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Jameson Rollins
eader should translate. I need to find a reference for this... jamie. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100410/14c96199/attachment.pgp>

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Jameson Rollins
art -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100410/30ee3848/attachment-0001.pgp>

[PATCH] git: Ignore packaging intermediate files

2010-04-10 Thread David Edmondson
commit c9ff373f8bdcc6b55c6df8e0d4582d459ef87c31 Author: David Edmondson Date: Sat Apr 10 09:02:32 2010 +0100 git: Ignore packaging intermediate files Modified .gitignore diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 217440d..c685340 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -13,3

RFC: User-Agent header

2010-04-10 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:00:49 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > On 2010-04-10, Carl Worth wrote: > > So I propose something like: > > > > User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux) > > That looks good to me. So I assume the correct strategy here would be > to: >

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:52:04 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > On 2010-04-10, Carl n?tmuch ? Worth wrote: > > Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes > > through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the From line being > > replied to? Let's test that here... > > I

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:05:00 -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:47:20 -0700, Dirk Hohndel > wrote: > > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:44:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel > > wrote: > > > > > > here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line... > > > > Carl =?UTF-8?b?buKIhXRtdWNoIOSasw==?=

Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Michael Elkins
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:06:54AM -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote: > Again, this subject line shows up fine for me in notmuch-show in emacs. > I believe the non-ASCII characters in headers have to be escaped for > mail handlers to properly handle them, and the reader should translate. > I need to

[PATCH] Have notmuch count default to showing the total.

2010-04-10 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 23:01, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On 2010-04-08, Mike Kelly wrote: >> If no parameters are given to notmuch-count, or just '' or '*' are >> given, return the total number of messages in the database. > I know that cworth was concerned about this syntax on IRC as that would >

Initial attempt at a "merge window" for notmuch

2010-04-10 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 02:23, Carl Worth wrote: > 3. Ability to easily post search results to a web page. Isn't that a job for "noneatall" [0] -- maybe it just needs the ability to export to static pages, that can be rsync'ed somewhere? [0] http://github.com/dme/noneatall > 4. Fancy support

[RFC] reordering and cleanup of thread authors

2010-04-10 Thread Michal Sojka
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:07:27 +0200, Michal Sojka > wrote: > > On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > > > > > This is based in part on some discussion on IRC today. > > > When a thread is displayed in the search results, previously the authors > >

Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Michal Sojka
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Carl n∅tmuch 䚳 Worth wrote: On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote: Perhaps Carl should get more Nørwég¡añ friends, :-). Or Görmän or 中文 Are you all trying to show a problem here?

Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:47:20 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote: On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:44:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote: here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line... Carl =?UTF-8?b?buKIhXRtdWNoIOSasw==?= Worth cwo...@cworth.org, The To: line

Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:19 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Carl n∅tmuch 䚳 Worth wrote: Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the From line being replied to? Yes and also

Re: RFC: User-Agent header

2010-04-10 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:55:17 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: So I propose something like: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux) The problem I see is that if we go with this proposal, our mail will have inconsistent User-Agent: header, depending

Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-04-10, Carl n∅tmuch 䚳 Worth wrote: Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the From line being replied to? Let's test that here... I think there are 2 issues being discussed here. One is the encoding in the

Re: Initial attempt at a merge window for notmuch

2010-04-10 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-04-09, Carl Worth wrote: Here's the current list: Having such a list is great. So now we need to get you a key-binding that says, take query xy results and stuff them into the wiki (or some pastebin like service with a fixed URL). Looking forward to 0.2. Sebastian (THanks to the

Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:52:04 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: frontends that are making use of json already, and once (if?) emacs uses the json output too, this will become an issue there too. once, not if! jamie. pgpgzv5x4GFqI.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RFC: User-Agent header

2010-04-10 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-04-10, Carl Worth wrote: So I propose something like: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux) That looks good to me. So I assume the correct strategy here would be to: 1) have notmuch reply insert a header: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2

Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Michael Elkins
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:06:54AM -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote: Again, this subject line shows up fine for me in notmuch-show in emacs. I believe the non-ASCII characters in headers have to be escaped for mail handlers to properly handle them, and the reader should translate. I need to find a

Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:05:00 -0400, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:47:20 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote: On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:44:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote: here's what's going wrong. Look at the

Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:52:04 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: On 2010-04-10, Carl n∅tmuch 䚳 Worth wrote: Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the From line being replied to? Let's test that

Re: RFC: User-Agent header

2010-04-10 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:00:49 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: On 2010-04-10, Carl Worth wrote: So I propose something like: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux) That looks good to me. So I assume the correct strategy here would

[PATCH] notmuch new --new-tags=tags...

2010-04-10 Thread Anthony Towns
Hi *, The attached patch makes notmuch new --new-tags=unread,new set the unread and new tags on any new mail it finds rather than unread and inbox. Or whatever other tags you happen to specify. Signed-off-by: Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au --- NEWS |3 +++ notmuch-new.c | 49

Re: [PATCH] notmuch new --new-tags=tags...

2010-04-10 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 01:03:04 +1000, Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au wrote: Hi *, The attached patch makes notmuch new --new-tags=unread,new set the unread and new tags on any new mail it finds rather than unread and inbox. Or whatever other tags you happen to specify. I really like this -

Re: [notmuch] Bulk message tagging

2010-04-10 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:51:01 -0600, Mark Anderson markr.ander...@amd.com wrote: I think that '*' is definitely an awesome command, but I wonder if we shouldn't have another command for the notmuch-search buffer which means 'tag all the threads that I can see in this buffer'. This is

Re: RFC: User-Agent header

2010-04-10 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:12:47 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote: On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:26:01 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: notmuch is (mostly) not responsible for sending email. However, people using the emacs frontend use notmuch to create the reply.

Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

2010-04-10 Thread Michal Sojka
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Jameson Rollins wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:19 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Carl n∅tmuch 䚳 Worth wrote: Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the

Re: Initial attempt at a merge window for notmuch

2010-04-10 Thread Michal Sojka
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Mark Anderson wrote: On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:29:20 -0500, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: Of course, it's the same set-theoretic operation I described earlier. I want the set of threads having messages matching: tag:notmuch and date-range intersected with

Re: Initial attempt at a merge window for notmuch

2010-04-10 Thread Sandra Snan
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:24:01 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: In id:4b9d4e24.0f67f10a.31e3.a...@mx.google.com, Sandra asked for something like: notmuch search not threads:( from:me and position:last ) Naw, actually I forgot to follow that up. I was looking for it to work it