A tool for printing from notmuch

2011-01-29 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
ree it is the best thing for surely broken html email Sebastian -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20

A tool for printing from notmuch

2011-01-29 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
ytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110129/5fc38473/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH 0/4] Versatile date/time parser

2011-01-29 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
dy though. Sebastian -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110129/4d94196e/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH 0/4] Versatile date/time parser

2011-01-29 Thread Michal Sojka
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Prince wrote: > On 2011-01-23, Michal Sojka wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > the following patch series brings into notmuch date/time parser stolen > > from GNU coreutils. It can be applied on top of custom query parser > > patches from Austin Clements. > > > > This is RFC and

notmuch's idea of concurrency / failing an invocation

2011-01-29 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
on/pgp-signature Size: 1030 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110129/3740e20e/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH 1/3] new: Do not defer maildir flag synchronization during the first run

2011-01-29 Thread Rob Browning
Austin Clements writes: > Sure. I've been wanting to take a crack at notmuch new's atomicity for > a while. Though you'll have to get through some of my outstanding > patches. I can only keep so many branches in my head. ]:--8) > > rlb, you expressed an interest in solving this problem, too. Did

A tool for printing from notmuch

2011-01-29 Thread Jesse Rosenthal
Hi Sebastian, On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:58:53 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > I prefer to not have dependencies outside the std lib in python, but for > xml/html parsing, there is really nothing appropriate, it seems. I agree. And I'll admit I mainly chose BeautifulSoup out of familiarity. But

[PATCH] Add a few tests for searching LWN emails.

2011-01-29 Thread Matthieu Lemerre
> Yes, I believe this is related to the dot in the name. From my > recollection a name with an address requires quoting. So the header that > is currently formatted as: > > From: LWN.net Weekly Notification > > should instead be: > > From: "LWN.net Weekly Notification" Hi all,

[PATCH 0/4] Versatile date/time parser

2011-01-29 Thread Austin Clements
What about CVS's getdate? Is GPLv1 compatible? As far as I can tell, CVS's getdate depends only on yacc/bison and is probably back-in-time-biased rather than forward-in-time-biased like the coreutils getdate. On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Michal Sojka wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom

[PATCH] Add a few tests for searching LWN emails.

2011-01-29 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:17:54 -0700, Jake Edge wrote: > Hi Carl and Thomas, > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:59:38 +1000 Carl Worth wrote: > > > Yes, I believe this is related to the dot in the name. From my > > recollection a name with an address requires quoting. So the header > > that is currently

notmuch's idea of concurrency / failing an invocation

2011-01-29 Thread Mike Kelly
s. -- Mike Kelly -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110129/6a776456/attachment.pgp>

notmuch's idea of concurrency / failing an invocation

2011-01-29 Thread Stewart Smith
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:40:25 -0500, micah anderson wrote: > Due to my harddisk in my laptop being slow (5400RPM), my notmuch > database growing, and perhaps some fragmentation somewhere, this has > become *incredibly* annoying for me. I am checking email every 30 > minutes, and I'm nicing and

About the json output and the number of results shown.

2011-01-29 Thread Mike Kelly
signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110129/b19f2056/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH] Various small clean-ups to doc ID set code.

2011-01-29 Thread Carl Worth
tch broken up and sent again. -Carl -- carl.d.worth at intel.com -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110129/9a91e46e/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH 3/4] Optimize thread search using matched docid sets.

2011-01-29 Thread Carl Worth
... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110129/46532cee/attachment.pgp> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: notmuch-perf Type: application

[PATCH] Have to configure and build inside the source directory.

2011-01-29 Thread Carl Worth
- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110129/c77c3794/attachment.pgp>

[ANN] notmuch-deliver

2011-01-29 Thread Carl Worth
available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110129/004959a3/attachment.pgp>

[ANN] notmuch-deliver

2011-01-29 Thread Carl Worth
mail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110129/3ac5dfea/attachment.pgp>

[ANN] notmuch-deliver

2011-01-29 Thread Carl Worth
notmuch man page, then we should do that too. -Carl -- carl.d.worth at intel.com -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110129/91937730/attachment-0001.pgp>

About the json output and the number of results shown.

2011-01-29 Thread Carl Worth
-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110129/f649abb3/attachment.pgp>

About the json output and the number of results shown.

2011-01-29 Thread Carl Worth
added to specify that structure clearly. -Carl -- carl.d.worth at intel.com -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/not

About the json output and the number of results shown.

2011-01-29 Thread Carl Worth
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110129/4d5bafc3/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH] Add a few tests for searching LWN emails.

2011-01-29 Thread Carl Worth
RL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110129/1e1a6d6b/attachment-0001.pgp>

Re: [PATCH] Add a few tests for searching LWN emails.

2011-01-29 Thread Jake Edge
Hi Carl and Thomas, On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:59:38 +1000 Carl Worth wrote: Yes, I believe this is related to the dot in the name. From my recollection a name with an address requires quoting. So the header that is currently formatted as: From: LWN.net Weekly Notification l...@lwn.net

Re: [PATCH] Add a few tests for searching LWN emails.

2011-01-29 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:17:54 -0700, Jake Edge j...@lwn.net wrote: Hi Carl and Thomas, On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:59:38 +1000 Carl Worth wrote: Yes, I believe this is related to the dot in the name. From my recollection a name with an address requires quoting. So the header that is

Re: notmuch's idea of concurrency / failing an invocation

2011-01-29 Thread Mike Kelly
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:57:34 -0500 Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote: Yes, exactly. All of this. Unfortunately, Xapian doesn't expose the ability to block on the lock (see the fcntl call in backends/flint_lock.cc, which is hard-coded to the non-blocking F_SETLK instead of F_SETLKW), so

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Versatile date/time parser

2011-01-29 Thread Michal Sojka
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Prince wrote: On 2011-01-23, Michal Sojka wrote: Hi all, the following patch series brings into notmuch date/time parser stolen from GNU coreutils. It can be applied on top of custom query parser patches from Austin Clements. This is RFC and it not meant

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Versatile date/time parser

2011-01-29 Thread Austin Clements
What about CVS's getdate? Is GPLv1 compatible? As far as I can tell, CVS's getdate depends only on yacc/bison and is probably back-in-time-biased rather than forward-in-time-biased like the coreutils getdate. On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: On Sat, 29

Re: A tool for printing from notmuch

2011-01-29 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:25:28 -0500, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote: Dear all, Printing from notmuch is a bit of a pain. Hi Jesse, that sounds like a fantastic solution and I will look into it, so far I have been printing the buffers which does not include attachments at all. I

Re: notmuch's idea of concurrency / failing an invocation

2011-01-29 Thread Stewart Smith
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:40:25 -0500, micah anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote: Due to my harddisk in my laptop being slow (5400RPM), my notmuch database growing, and perhaps some fragmentation somewhere, this has become *incredibly* annoying for me. I am checking email every 30 minutes, and I'm

Re: notmuch's idea of concurrency / failing an invocation

2011-01-29 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 01/28/2011 08:05 PM, Stewart Smith wrote: I'm about at the point where I'm going to take my git mail store experiments and get them really to work (and everyone will have to use 'notmuch cat' or the like to access the messages) Would this hypothetical git-based mail store retain the

Re: [PATCH 1/3] new: Do not defer maildir flag synchronization during the first run

2011-01-29 Thread Rob Browning
Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu writes: Sure. I've been wanting to take a crack at notmuch new's atomicity for a while. Though you'll have to get through some of my outstanding patches. I can only keep so many branches in my head. ]:--8) rlb, you expressed an interest in solving this