On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:50:57 +0100, Michal Sojka
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Prince wrote:
> > > On 2011-01-23, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > the following patch series brings into notmuch date/time parser stolen
> >
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Austin Clements wrote:
> What about CVS's getdate? Is GPLv1 compatible? As far as I can tell,
> CVS's getdate depends only on yacc/bison and is probably
> back-in-time-biased rather than forward-in-time-biased like the
> coreutils getdate.
Hmm, it looks good. It is GPLv2 or
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Austin Clements wrote:
What about CVS's getdate? Is GPLv1 compatible? As far as I can tell,
CVS's getdate depends only on yacc/bison and is probably
back-in-time-biased rather than forward-in-time-biased like the
coreutils getdate.
Hmm, it looks good. It is GPLv2 or
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:14:27 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
On 01/28/2011 08:05 PM, Stewart Smith wrote:
I'm about at the point where I'm going to take my git mail store
experiments and get them really to work (and everyone will have to use
'notmuch cat' or the
I rebased the query parser against current master. It's on the
qparser-3 branch at
http://awakening.csail.mit.edu/git/notmuch.git
At cworth's request, I've folded the database closing bug fix in to
the appropriate patch. I also stripped out my implementation of
folder searching, since it