[PATCH 2/2] vim: parse 'from' address

2011-02-06 Thread Felipe Contreras
In order to pass it to sendmail. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras --- vim/plugin/notmuch.vim | 11 ++- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim b/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim index 002b771..08832cc 100644 --- a/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim +++

[PATCH 1/2] vim: use sendmail directly

2011-02-06 Thread Felipe Contreras
The problem with 'mailx' is that it's not standardized, and it doesn't allow the -f option, which is pretty important on many sendmail configurations. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras --- vim/plugin/notmuch.vim |8 +--- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 0/2] vim: improvements for sendmail

2011-02-06 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi, I use msmtp to send mail, and I rely on the 'from' address to be set correctly (-f foo at bar.com) in order to pick the right account to send mail from. Postfix and other MTA's can be configured in similar ways. It's impossible to use this functionality with mailx, so let's use sendmail

[PATCH] Have --format=mbox insert Status:

2011-02-06 Thread Peter John Hartman
> Hi Peter, > > would this output be compatible with all mbox consumers or only with > those who expect the Status: line? If the latter, we would probably want > a command line option to enable this. Hi, As far as I've been able to tell everyone respects RO in mbox, so I don't see this as a

[PATCH] test/search: add check for slightly trick search

2011-02-06 Thread Felipe Contreras
It's not really tricky, there are many addresses with a '-' in them. I personally really want to differentiate between foo, foo-testing, and foo-patches. This fails, but it shouldn't: FAIL Search by from (tricky): --- search.17.expected 2011-02-06 13:16:31.871509560 + +++

notmuch-show-get-filename and maildir location

2011-02-06 Thread Michal Sojka
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011, micah wrote: > > I recently upgraded to the newer notmuch to test out the new folder > patch (its great!) and the new decryption/signature verification (its > fantastic!), and noticed something odd start happening. > > I think that notmuch moves a new message to the maildir

Remote usage script updated

2011-02-06 Thread Michal Sojka
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011, Michal Sojka wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: > > A future feature might be to integrate the ControlMaster feature of > > openssh into the script, instead of having to open a connection > > manually, but there are some complications there (dead sockets

Re: [PATCH] Have --format=mbox insert Status:

2011-02-06 Thread Peter John Hartman
Hi Peter, would this output be compatible with all mbox consumers or only with those who expect the Status: line? If the latter, we would probably want a command line option to enable this. Hi, As far as I've been able to tell everyone respects RO in mbox, so I don't see this as a problem.

Re: [PATCH] test/search: add check for slightly trick search

2011-02-06 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: It's not really tricky, there are many addresses with a '-' in them. I personally really want to differentiate between foo, foo-testing, and foo-patches. This fails, but it shouldn't: As discussed in IRC,