On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:00:36 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:25:14 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > I know you prefer tests to go before patches and I agree with that.
>
> Great!
>
> > But most of the time I do tests after coding.
>
> Yes, I do that order almost
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:06:40 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2011 01:42:22 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have just send two more patches to this thread. One with new tests.
> > Another with a workaround for the bug. The workaround should not break
> > anything since
---
notmuch-reply.c | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/notmuch-reply.c b/notmuch-reply.c
index 64f70bf..27ef37b 100644
--- a/notmuch-reply.c
+++ b/notmuch-reply.c
@@ -427,13 +427,13 @@ guess_from_received_header (notmuch_config_t *config,
Mta variable was not free()d in one case.
---
notmuch-reply.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/notmuch-reply.c b/notmuch-reply.c
index dab69e6..64f70bf 100644
--- a/notmuch-reply.c
+++ b/notmuch-reply.c
@@ -401,8 +401,10 @@ guess_from_received_header
Before the change, the last loop in guess_from_received_header()
did not reset domain and tld variables to NULL. This leads to
double free error in some cases and possibly other bugs.
---
notmuch-reply.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/notmuch-reply.c
lease keep it up!
-Carl
--
carl.d.worth at intel.com
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110615/49ba95ec/attachment.pgp>
, etc.).
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110615/ba05a100/attachment.pgp>
ll pushed now.
-Carl
--
carl.d.worth at intel.com
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110615/628ecd30/attachment.pgp>
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110615/ebf7d689/attachment.pgp>
On Tue, 31 May 2011 10:07:13 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> This adds two callback functions to the sigstatus button. If the sig
> status is "good", then clicking the button displays the output of "gpg
> --list-keys" on the key fingerprint. If the sigstatus is "bad", then
> clicking the
On Tue, 31 May 2011 10:07:13 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
This adds two callback functions to the sigstatus button. If the sig
status is good, then clicking the button displays the output of gpg
--list-keys on the key fingerprint. If the sigstatus is bad,
Mta variable was not free()d in one case.
---
notmuch-reply.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/notmuch-reply.c b/notmuch-reply.c
index dab69e6..64f70bf 100644
--- a/notmuch-reply.c
+++ b/notmuch-reply.c
@@ -401,8 +401,10 @@ guess_from_received_header
---
notmuch-reply.c | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/notmuch-reply.c b/notmuch-reply.c
index 64f70bf..27ef37b 100644
--- a/notmuch-reply.c
+++ b/notmuch-reply.c
@@ -427,13 +427,13 @@ guess_from_received_header (notmuch_config_t *config,
On Fri, 27 May 2011 01:42:22 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just send two more patches to this thread. One with new tests.
Another with a workaround for the bug. The workaround should not break
anything since it affects only notmuch-show mode.
Thanks!
I
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:12:12 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Before the change, the last loop in guess_from_received_header()
did not reset domain and tld variables to NULL. This leads to
double free error in some cases and possibly other bugs.
Thanks for the fixes.
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:06:40 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 01:42:22 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just send two more patches to this thread. One with new tests.
Another with a workaround for the bug. The workaround should
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:25:14 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
I know you prefer tests to go before patches and I agree with that. But
most of the time I do tests after coding. I do not know an easy way to
reorder patches in git. (Also I do not know how to amend an
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:25:14 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
I know you prefer tests to go before patches and I agree with that.
Great!
But most of the time I do tests after coding.
Yes, I do that order almost exclusively as well.
I do not know an easy way to
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:00:36 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:25:14 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
I know you prefer tests to go before patches and I agree with that.
Great!
But most of the time I do tests after coding.
19 matches
Mail list logo